All Activity

Yeah… that outrage is as fake as Trump’s tan.

I posted this on the Epstein thread. I have to wonder……so many people have said she was covering for Trump. Why on earth would he get rid of the person supposedly covering his arse? Of course the libs never make sense. They also claimed she was in lock step. Another inane comment.

Highly respected constitutional originalist just sided with Trump on birthright citizenship! [Hidden Content]

Trump picks Todd Blanche, who is the deputy attorney general, as her replacement. There was some speculation that Lee Zeldin would get the nod. But Trump picked someone else. [Hidden Content]

Did you complain when it was over $5 under Biden? And that was gas, not diesel. Dems and your fake outrage!

I've answered this spread out among multiple different posts. I've attached a link that boils it down fairly simple and is a short read. Please read it. It's a pretty good layman's explanation. It won't make you happy. But, it will explain. [Hidden Content]

That will require a gymnastics answer which I am sure will be coming soon. I am sure you can get a good answer from Trumps new Board of Peace he started on the 22nd of January this year right before he started a war with Iran. Smh

Trump said we have so much oil that other countries should purchase oil from the U.S. Why is unleaded $3.89 today and has been going up every single day if we are busting out so much oil?

Here you go….. [Hidden Content]

Have no clue. I don't keep up with softball.

Well, the thread is about crude oil prices and everything is blamed on Trump. As you said previously, breaking down the costs of what actually goes into shipping and refining, lots of people can’t imagine. I don’t think it’s off-topic to discuss some of the smaller people like me, who are still involved in the cost of getting product to the people. Heck, if I’m told it’s off topic, that’d be ok and I’d start another thread because I think it would be fun to pick your brain. Maybe others would join in with their life experiences. After all, life is nothing more than a collection of memories and I find myself reminiscing more and more. I have some good stories from back then and even during my subcontracting years during the 80s/90s.

So, BH and LP would probably meet again if they make it that far in Div 1 PO’s if I’m seeing standings correctly? (Assuming BH & Sterling being Div 1.)

Just one off topic to follow-up on your bow thruster comment. They are AWESOME! Put one in my last 32' Stamas. One of the best boating decisions I ever made. I never worried about docking by my self again. Even with a boat that was 35'3" OAL.

Softball is just like the other sports. They will split into divisions after district play.

Back in those days, to load the grain ship, she had to be maneuvered back and forth to level out the grain. The bow and stern mooring lines had to be loosened and tightened to move the ship to and fro. I had nothing to do with their mooring as Continental Grain Elevator was separate from Mobil, but they were next door and we were able to watch. They probably have better loading procedures today, but that’s how it was done in the olden days. Lol. Some of the smaller tankers that were not Mobil owned, had much smaller mooring lines. Their ropes were about 2” diameter and we called them “kite stringers”. Some ships had bow thrusters and were able to dock using just one tug. Bow thruster was a propeller located in the bow that moved the ship port or starboard. Only dealt with one of those. Mobil ships had 4” ropes for mooring. On the bow and stern, the ropes were accompanied with 1” cables. Had a special hook for the cables called pelican hooks. The ropes went in a simple hook because we were able to lift the rope out of the hook to sail. The pelican hook was specially designed to handle the weight of the cable and a release that would allow disengagement. All mobil ships coming in to dock had to pass up the docks and enter the turning basin where the tugs would turn the ship around before mooring so that she was heading out after loading. All ship traffic was not necessarily hauling in crude. Some were sailing in to load heating oil for up north. That was a regular trip. Had a ship named the Grigerosa which brought in Mexican crude. You could smell her before she rounded the bend……high sulphur content. I could go on but I’m sure this is boring to some. I think you have a great knowledge of the refining part. I picked up a little along the way. I was in my 20s when this took place.

Until one of them elects a populist who pulls out of all of their trade agreements in favor of punitive tariffs, drops out of their defensive alliances for perceived slights, then starts attacking sovereign countries and taking their resources on his own whims. It would be over at that point. Kinda like what’s going on with the US and its allies right now.

I noticed that Maxpreps has BH at #2 in 5A, and La Porte is #4 in 5A. Would these two teams be in separate divisions like we were in basketball, or is softball all one division?

[Hidden Content] He has completely succeeded in failing. We are passed that phase.😔

I still think the best outcome would be for the other Arab countries/nations directly impacted by Iran's aggressive posture to finish the necessary kinetic actions (which they seem more willing to do now that Iran is degraded), and work the diplomatic side along with assistance--as required/requested--from the U.S. This could be an excellent opportunity to solidify the Abraham Accord countries, and actually provide a ME with some lasting peace. Or, at least as much peace as can be between religious factions. If their economies can become intertwined, along with security agreements between nations, you may see some real progress. The region could really be a more secular, economically advanced region--even with Muslim foundations--if they were to cooperate. That--to me--would be the most positive outcome, and allow the U.S. to remove itself from the conflict with a successful mission. Iran was a known threat. This was proven by their attempts to attack Garcia. They had the tech, the range, and the desire to do real damage. It was never going to be pretty though, and it was a pipe dream to think it would be anything else.

The country with the mightiest army doesn’t always win. I’d argue that there are dozens of instances where the better force was rebuffed. I think you have Trump in way over his head geopolitically and militarily and surrounded by people who don’t understand, either. There are some fights that you just shouldn’t pick. I’m afraid that he’s picked one of those fights with Iran. I hope I’m wrong. I hope they overthrow their new strongman, embrace capitalism and Christianity, give us all of their oil, and allow Trump to build a hotel in Tehran. Which is pretty much how Trump pictured this going after 2-3 weeks of bombardment.

Or, the people who realize--for good or bad--when the decision was made to go in, there was going to be no easy way out without a regime change, and a regime change--without an internal takeover--was going to require ground troops of some type. I said from the very beginning--before this started--you weren't going to dislodge the IRGC with just an air campaign.