Leaderboard

Watch this idiot take credit for lowering gas prices, especially with mid terms around the corner. It will make the Dem party appear better than they are, and people will swallow it hook, line, and sinker. Like I stated before, Biden would set fire to your house, then expect a pat on the back for putting it out. What a PUTZ. Biden administration resumes oil and gas leases on federal lands as gasoline prices soar [Hidden Content] Explore the Fox News apps that are right for you at [Hidden Content].

I heard it's a sham. The permitting process will take so long that it'll never happen! This is just being done for the low information voters. PS -- I just heard that young people between 18-34 have an approval rating of Joebama of only 21%. Looks like there is hope from the young!

I heard this movie can’t be released till Cardinalbacker approves of the sources being used to make it. At least that’s the word out on the street. I am sure all the evidence is just made up. Most secure election in American History! 😂😂😂😂😂

A man went to visit a friend in the hospital and asked him what happened. He said I don’t know. My wife and I were at the state fair and we were looking at the grand champion bull. There was a sign next to him saying that he had bred 300 cows last year. Next was a reserve grand champion and we saw that he had bred 250 cows in the last year. One of the runner ups had bred 200 cows. My wife commented on how these bulls were able to perform so often. The last thing I remember, I said something to my wife like yes but it’s not the same old cow. The next thing I knew, I was in the hospital.

Not many teams walk into Norman and get 20 hits and 14 runs. Great day for Lamar baseball.

Veterans Grocery in Orange still did that back in 2010. Not even sure if they're still open today though. Those old mom & pop shops are probably all extinct now. Wait... this ain't "Hagar’s Ramblings "?

You’re correct, the goofball supporters will think he’s actually doing something good. If he’d did it over a year ago, it might have helped. Now it’s like urinating on a house fire.

Charlie Kirk gave a great interview. These are 2 brave individuals that have put out some much needed information about the massive voter fraud, an from what they said “the rip cord of massive voter fraud information will be pulled once all the naysayers start trying to pick apart the movie “

Imagine, a big picture of the Russian Cruiser Moskva. Above it: HEROIC CRUISER MOSKVA And underneath: PROMOTED TO SUBMARINE 😂😂😂😂🤣🤣👽🤣🤣😂😂😂😂

Hey Elon, have you considered that Twitter is blocking your offer because they are afraid you’d obtain documents proving they shadow ban and censor, which would contradict sworn testimony made before Congress? This could be an Enron type scenario you’ve uncovered.

Another guy went to visit a friend in the hospital and asked, what happened? The friend said I don’t know. I was at a bar and there was a couple of pretty large women down at the end of the bar and they had an accent. I walked over and asked, “ Are you two ladies from England”. One of them said “Wales”. I then said, “Okay, are you two whales from England”. The next thing I knew, I was in the hospital.

My wife ask me, How many women have you slept with? I proudly replied, Only you Darling. With all the others, I was awake. HOSPITAL VISITING HOURS ARE 10am TO 8pm.

The suspect is stopped with the wrong license plate, meaning it might be a stolen vehicle. That makes it a possible felony and heightens the risk to the officer. It is not like a person will not fight over a misdemeanor because sometimes they do. It is just much more likely if a person is facing prison time to want to use all means to resist. Then the suspect adds to that by trying to get away. Stop resisting arrest or detention. It is not difficult. Make bail and go to trial two years later. For all we know, the guy might have borrowed a license plate only get a citation. The officer does not know at that point and cannot read the guy‘s mind. The the idiot videoing saying stop talking to him like that. I am assuming he is commenting to the officer but not sure. The suspect during the struggle to resist arrest gets his hands on the officer’s Taser making him a deadly risk to the officer. It is likely a legal use of force: But….. In hindsight (covered later) shooting “might have been” premature. Only because….. in calm reflection of not being in the fight, the biggest threat of the Taser is to get the wires/leads (darts which are fish hooks-I think they used to use Eagle Claw and Mustad)) attached to you. This is maybe a 95+% chance of incapacitating you. I am only going to guess that the Taser darts had been deployed during the struggle. If they had, the Taser is still a weapon but is probably not as likely to cause incapacitation. With the darts gone, is mostly a pain compliance tool at that point….. maybe. It is also entirely possible that at least one of the darts was making contact with the officer. If so, it still has incapacitation capabilities by completing the circuit by the Taser making contact with any part of the officer’s body. That is a lot of what ifs. The United States Supreme Court said in Graham v. Connor that an officer in a use of force incident should not be judged in hindsight however. They said the officer is faced with a “split-second decision”. It was a unanimous decision that it must be judged through the eyes of an officer at that time, “even if it later may seem unnecessary in the peace of the judge’s chambers”. They ruled that “totality of circumstances” (used to determine probable cause) should not be used in this kind of case but should rely on the concept of “objective reasonableness”. That is determined by an opinion of, what would a reasonable officer determine faced with the same set of circumstances and who has to make that split second decision. The unanimous decision clearly showed that it is easy to sit in a judge’s chamber six months later and say something differently could’ve happened when sitting in the peace of the situation you are not faced with that life-threatening situation. It is easy to look back in a calm reflection and to say, maybe I could’ve done something differently. So without calm reflection of looking back at the video and not being involved, would a reasonable officer feel that he might be in danger of serious injury or death? Remember that the use of deadly force in self-defense, including by a civilian, does not require you to be in danger of only death but also a serious injury which could be a broken bone. At least going by Texas law I would say that it is likely justified.

Nice pro debut for Chad