The person that posted it said that woman saved her kids. No, she didn’t.
The police got her son out and she said so.
People sometimes tend to ignore the obvious when dealing with emotions. At one point in the video )about the one minute mark) the woman said that the second teacher would not open the door which I am sure is protocol. Then, “they” started to lead me out. “They” has to be the police. Who else escorted her out of the building when she was trying to get her son? Then “they” opened the door (again likely protocol to wait for the police) which again has to be the police. Next the reporter asked, did you ever see any police in the building…. “No”.
Well then who was they that started to escort you out and they that opened the door to get the kids out?
1. The woman was understandably emotional. Who wouldn’t be?
2. She went into a building where the shooter was not likely located. That school has about 7 buildings and the shooter was isolated in one.
3. She was not allowed into the classroom which makes sense. The teacher probably doesn’t know her. The woman could be part of the active shooters.
4. The police (I can’t think of who else) started to escort her out and almost simultaneously opened the door to get the kids out.… the denies any police were on scene.
5. The reporter (oddly in my opinion) then says the woman was not in the same building. The reporter the adds (which is the entire point) that the woman’s energy and frustration is what “is reverberating”.
Point 5 sums it up, emotions play, not necessarily the facts.