Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 08/07/2022 in all areas
-
DCTFM update
Matthew328 and one other reacted to DLivingston for a topic
Picked up one at Bridge City Walmart today.2 points -
Orange County broadcast
Hagar reacted to WOSdrummer99 for a topic
Hit me up if you don't remember your password, old man. 🤣 👽1 point -
No one did it like Gary... Hoping he can continue in some fashion.1 point
-
Cool Weapon
5GallonBucket reacted to tvc184 for a topic
The super secret but apparently everyone knows about it missile was probably inspired by a bow hunter. [Hidden Content]1 point -
Hull-Daisetta Bobcats 2022 Preview
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to JohnRuthDomergue for a topic
If HD stays political with coaches kids starting over players with more talent, HD will have a terrible season. The QB position for HD is all favoritism, there are 3-4 better options at QB for HD, but Wallace’s kid will start, Birdwell won’t ruffle feathers with his staff. Also, they keep letting athletes like Devante Broussard and now Dawson Victorian leave to Liberty and Baytown, FYI both kids will excel for these bigger schools, Devante did last year. If HD replaces the Wallace kid at QB, they win 3 more games, at this point every team that plays HD, they put 11 in the box lol.1 point -
Kari Lake
5GallonBucket reacted to myrecordwashorrible for a topic
Simply state this. If DC is Hollywood for ugly people, she need not have aspirations beyond Arizona.1 point -
SETXsports has not received any official go ahead to broadcast any of the Orange County schools—although we have had some positive conversation with school officials but no green light at this point.. We certainly remain open to the possibility but we are running very short on time..1 point
-
5AD1 District 8 and Region 2 discussion.
Bud Kilmer reacted to gary-us-bonds for a topic
Nothing I have seen from Sterling leads me to believe they should be considered the dark horse to make any playoffs unless we have expanded to 6 teams. Their QB, who was pretty much a one man show, graduated. I don't see how they will be as good as they were last year even.1 point -
Orange County broadcast
RETIREDFAN1 reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
SETXsports is in talks with Orange County teams to broadcast their games. It's my understanding they already have the go ahead for WO-S and Bridge City.1 point -
I listened to most of the UIL meeting online. This if what I got from the meeting and action. 1. Alto was represented and under oath admitted the violation whether intentional or accident. It happened. 2. The UIL did not ban nor take a vote ban Alto. The ban is an automatic rules violation and UIL rules are that a school is not eligible for post season or honors if placed in a lower division by falsifying the numbers (again, intentional or otherwise). 3. Alto suggested simply changing to the correct 2A Div 1 where they were supposed to be. THAT is what seems like the main discussion focused on after the investigation phase. Okay, they messed up but do you punish the students? What is the relief? 4. The UIL committee voted unanimously that there simply was no time. If I understood what was being said in the meeting, the UIL committee had no authority to change the realignment. Alto could technically change districts however scrimmages start this coming Friday (realistically with no effect on the district) but the regular season in a couple of weeks. There is no time for two districts to throw out there schedules and start over. The false numbers were reported this month so the UIL was up against a severe time constraint. Basically it was, sorry Alto but this was turned in to late to correct. 5. Alto is not banned from post season next year but by the same rule, Alto is not allowed to compete in the lower division. You can’t have a 2A Div 1 school potentially winning the 2A Div 2 district they are currently in or even state championship. Can we imagine… The new 2A Div 2 state champion is, 2A Div 1 Alto!!! 🤣 6. Alto will be allowed to compete in 2A Div 1 next year however…… Alto has to find any district in their region that will accept them. If they do, then each member school from the district committees in BOTH districts must unanimously accept releasing Alto from their current district and being accepted into the new district. So any school from either district has essentially veto power and again, this was not a vote but a UIL rule. We know locally those district committees have life and death authority over rules violations locally. Was it Nederland a few years ago who had to forfeit a district game because of an ineligible transfer player and it took them out of the playoffs? If I remember correctly, paperwork for the transfer was submitted and like Alto, intentional or not, the district committee gets to make the call. They voted for the forfeiture. To make it short, the UIL did not vote to ban Alto, UIL rules did that automatically. You can’t play and qualify in a lower division due to the mistake. Alto has the option of correcting it next year but they have to find a district to accept them and then both districts will have to unanimously accept the change.1 point
-
Going to be very different on Friday Nights for sure.1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point
-
1 point