Leaderboard
Popular Content
Showing content with the highest reputation on 01/02/2024 in all areas
-
Marquee Games for this week, Jan. 2-6
UNT-AggieMan and 4 others reacted to Tyerman for a topic
New Waverly vs Coldspring game will be very telling on how for real New Waverly will be in the district playoff mix. Onalaska vs Tarkington will be a very tough contested game. Could easily see that game coming down to who has the ball last with a win at the buzzer. really interested in how the EC vs Kountze game goes I bet that will be super fun game.5 points -
College Football Playoff
Mr. Buddy Garrity and 2 others reacted to BEARCPA for a topic
Michigan wins that easily if their special teams had a clue tonight3 points -
Silsbee 100 Vidor 62/FINAL
BADSANTA and one other reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Decent. Been playing pretty good of late. Won the East Chambers tournament. #5 is a very good guard. I would say top 5 player in district. I would put the line at Silsbee -262 points -
Marquee Games for this week, Jan. 2-6
Cu Chulainn and one other reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Kountze -92 points -
Wasn’t a block in the back because the play was over. Should’ve been a personal foul.2 points
-
College Football Playoff
TxHoops and one other reacted to 5GallonBucket for a topic
Penalties Poor secondary coverage Poor qb play turnovers UT lucky to even be in this game.2 points -
Texas was doomed from the start2 points
-
Marquee Games for this week, Jan. 2-6
Coach.Shu and one other reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
My schedule for this week: Tuesday Spurger at 1A #8 Brookeland Wednesday 6A #25 CE King at 6A #5 Beaumont United Friday 3A #7 Kountze at East Chambers Saturday Northwestern St. at Lamar2 points -
*Non District Game Thread, Tuesday Jan. 2*/Post updates here
AggiesAreWe reacted to Johhny Ringo for a topic
Splendora - 53 Big Sandy - 441 point -
Hardin 28 Orangefield 79/FINAL
Cu Chulainn reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Halftime 49-18 Orangefield1 point -
Jeffery Breaux named OF’s New AD
CowboyJeffR reacted to Cu Chulainn for a topic
If nothing negative was meant, then you have my sincerest apology. I'm sorry I took the post the wrong way. I do personally know some folks who have inside information on things sometimes, but I wouldnt want to lose their trust by sharing anything they tell me in confidence. On this particular "AD/HC Situation" I can just say that I believe it will be filled quickly since there is an immediate need to fill the role.1 point -
Hardin 28 Orangefield 79/FINAL
AggiesAreWe reacted to CowboyJeffR for a topic
According to Orangefield Hoops graphic on Twitter, this game is starting at 2:15 pm1 point -
What will the non football districts look like ? Anybody opinion?
SmashMouth reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Exactly1 point -
What will the non football districts look like ? Anybody opinion?
AggiesAreWe reacted to SmashMouth for a topic
If it's non-football districts you're questioning, then don't post in the football forum.1 point -
Jeffery Breaux named OF’s New AD
89Falcon reacted to setxathlete14 for a topic
No shots. Just have a good idea and info. you're in the know around OF without speculation on here. I do agree that was a great move but the admin on the community survey and hearsay says there's a bunch of great candidates Didn't know this could trigger such a childish reaction With the "taking shots" comment1 point -
Well, I’m over my throwing up now. What a game. Texas has nothing to be ashamed of. Penix completed 76% of his passes. I would have thought it was more like 90%. Texas never gave up. Came down to the last play. Hook ‘Em1 point
-
Duncanville Gloves??
Rob Corpus reacted to Coach Moore for a topic
I can tell you at one time in the NCAA(90's) it was illegal to match gloves to opponent's jerseys. I know this because we wore green gloves against Baylor and we were made to change them. However, there is not restriction on color now. I assume that changed after the grey glove rule. If you can afford to buy gloves that match your opponents, more power to you. I could not afford an extra $250-300 dollars on gloves. There are a lot of equipment rules that are not enforced. Here is the big one. Knee Pads. Knee pads must be covered by pants. Furthermore, the pants and knee pads must cover the knees. No pads or protective equipment may be worn outside the pants. I have asked the officials about this and they tell me they are not the uniform police.1 point -
As a Texas fan, I’m honestly not too upset. Washington was the better team, and Texas shot themselves in the foot over and over again. This year was still a huge success, and a lot of fun1 point
-
College Football Playoff
5GallonBucket reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
tu is about to steal this one.1 point -
Dont want to sound like I’m making excuses. Washington was definitely the better team tonight.1 point
-
College Football Playoff
baddog reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity for a topic
DB gotta turn his head around sooner. Good grief.1 point -
College Football Playoff
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to bullets13 for a topic
Texas has earned their penalties, but please explain how that one got waved off?1 point -
College Football Playoff
bullets13 reacted to PhatMack19 for a topic
Big stop keeps Texas within 2 TD’s. They have to score here1 point -
College Football Playoff
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to PhatMack19 for a topic
Who is calling for reviews without challenges outside of 2 minutes? That’s like the 3rd or 4th one1 point -
College Football Playoff
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to baddog for a topic
Our DBs need to turn for the ball. Lots of receptions were guarded very closely……game of inches.1 point -
1 point
-
College Football Playoff
baddog reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity for a topic
They have to get pressure on him. Can't continue to let him play pitch and catch with his WRs.1 point -
College Football Playoff
bullets13 reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
Not sure I like that play call on 4th down. Running against the strength of the horn defense.1 point -
College Football Playoff
Mr. Buddy Garrity reacted to AggiesAreWe for a topic
tu secondary is getting toasted so far. This was what concerned me the most with this match up.1 point -
College Football Playoff
5GallonBucket reacted to Mr. Buddy Garrity for a topic
UT secondary has to step it up a notch tonight.1 point -
1 point
-
I think you are spot on with your statement. I would be beyond mad if I were a lions fan, but I’m not. I’m a COWBOYS fan and have gone through this before when the nfl didn’t know what a catch was. Dez caught it!!! Must beat the redskins to get to 12-5, and lock up the 2seed. GO COWBOYS!!!1 point
-
What will the non football districts look like ? Anybody opinion?
navydawg31 reacted to Bigdog for a topic
Hey that’s an improvement over his last few threads!1 point -
1 point
-
Here is something that I have wondered about. Everyone has seen the video but we have no audio. All of the conclusions say, 68 must’ve reported because he was by the ref. So were two others, however, including 70. If we look closely at the video, the referee appears to be looking at 70 jogging toward him almost the entire time. All we are left with is two people, accusing each other. There appears to be absolutely no proof of either side of the story. However….. It has been reported that the referee went to Dallas and reported that 70 was a designated receiver. If that was true, even if that had been a mistake, should the play be allowed to stand? An example is that I’ve seen this from high school to the pros, if a referee has an inadvertent whistle, the play ends. They don’t speculate and play what if but the referees mistake negates anything in the future. We may have seen plays in the past, and I remember a couple, where a person broke into the open but the referee blew the whistle. They cannot speculate on what might have happened. If the referee makes a mistake, nothing after the mistake can go forward. So if 68 actually reported to the ref but the ref went to Dallas and mistakenly said it was 70, should the play go forward? Dallas could legitimately say, we did not line up to cover 68 because he should not have been an eligible receiver. The stuff that Campbell said about drawing up the play before the game on notifying the officials, which apparently is routine, should be meaningless within the rules. I imagine that’s just to give the referees a heads up of what “might” happen because what if Campbell wanted to run the exact play that he showed the referees before the game, but changed his mind and use a different lineman as a receiver? His excuse of, I told him before the game what might be coming… So what? Is his play calling limited to what he told the referees before the game? That would be ludicrous.1 point
-
1 point
-
I See A Moderator Has Locked A Subject!
Separation Scientist reacted to Reagan for a topic
Violations occur all the time. Even by moderators. I'm not admitting anything was violated. Just someones opinion. I may have to start making copies of violations, including moderators. This "selective" concern has been a problem here. I already have a copy of 2 moderators and a non-moderator violating the "stay on topic" rule but only the non-moderator got "warned." At this time I have chose not to do anything with this difference in treatment. Was this subject locked because of violations, which again, happens all the time, or because the moderator was being called out for being guilty of rule violations himself? Again, not picking on one: all moderators have been guilty of rule violations. @AggiesAreWe1 point -
I See A Moderator Has Locked A Subject!
DP#1FAN reacted to WOSdrummer99 for a topic
If u feel that members/mods have broken the rules, there is a report button. That is the extent of your responsibility for the policing the forum. With that being said... the topic has been locked without any reason given. And this is acceptable. There are several reasons for locking that particular discussion. I would've done the same thing. Thank you for your continued contributions to the site. Carry on... 🔒1 point -
Athlete Transfers
Separation Scientist reacted to Reagan for a topic
Nice response! LOL! BTW -- I'm sure this violates some forum rules. HA!1 point -
Athlete Transfers
Separation Scientist reacted to Reagan for a topic
EVERYONE here violates forum rules. EVEN the moderators. Especially the "don't get off topic" rules.1 point -
*OTHER TOURAMENT GAME THREAD, Dec. 27-30*/Post updates, scores here
lil brother reacted to JustUs for a topic
Blue Dove once said "Mental Toughness" Iron Sharpens Iron NO Cupcakes in this Tournament...Several Top 10- 6A Teams... So much said about United scheduling 4A competition. Way to work United. One game at a time. Region 3 is Legit....1 point -
*OTHER TOURAMENT GAME THREAD, Dec. 27-30*/Post updates, scores here
desethion reacted to BMTSoulja1 for a topic
All tournament team Sr, Clarence Payia Sr, Daniel Williams Tournament MVP Sr, Kayde Dotson1 point -
*OTHER TOURAMENT GAME THREAD, Dec. 27-30*/Post updates, scores here
lil brother reacted to BMTSoulja1 for a topic
Allen - 62 United - 70 Final1 point -
Way to quiet them skeptics Ashton , you played your but off , Daniel was hugeeee ,Deleon,Malachi,Wes, Paiya way to represent !!!!1 point
-
Dotson shooting like curry has 8 3pters1 point
-
*LEE COLLEGE TOURNAMENT GAME THREAD*/Post updates here
Separation Scientist reacted to pdawg119 for a topic
FINAL/OT BH 57 Ball 501 point -
Big time players show up in big time games Kayde Dotson that is you !!!! 16 more minutes !!!!1 point
-
Dallas ISD considering filing a grievance over PNG win
2wedge reacted to Matthew328 for a topic
What politics would make Coach Joseph and Coach Todd to both agree to a Fort Worth crew led by Bill Theodore for their 2022 game? I know Coach Todd pretty well and he doesnt strike me as the kind of guy who plays politics in the least..and I would think the same applies to Coach Joseph if he's like his Dad1 point -
Jeffery Breaux named OF’s New AD
gogo173489 reacted to TxHoops for a topic
Buna just hired one in girls hoops who had a very poor record at his previous school. He wasn’t a popular hire for that reason, understandably. I contended he was a very good hire because I know the young man, his passion, his character, and his tremendous knowledge of the game. In his first year, I would say he’s done a very good job by virtually all accounts. And it will only get better as he and his girls grow. So sometimes, those Ws and Ls can be misleading. in point of fact, Nick Saban has a losing record in the nfl. What a hack 😉1 point