LumRaiderFan

[Hidden Content] Another mamdani hire.

[Hidden Content] From the article: "A massive abuse of taxpayer dollars not only occurred under President Biden’s watch, but was effectively incentivized by his administration’s failure to implement strong financial controls resulting in billions worth of potential improper payments," HUD Secretary Scott Turner said in a statement provided to the Post. "HUD will continue investigating the shocking results and will take appropriate action to hold bad actors accountable," he said. "Additionally, the Department is advancing efforts made under President Trump’s first administration to strengthen program integrity and ensure taxpayer-funded assistance serves the vulnerable communities it was intended for."

[Hidden Content]

What’s sad is that the mainstream media are nothing more than influencers.

We’re gonna need another source to verify that the doors are locked and no kids are there.

[Hidden Content]

To be clear, you brought up the personal attacks and I said I couldn’t do anything about that, only moderators could, I wasn’t calling for more stringent control. For the most part, I have no problem with the job the moderators do here, it’s a fairly hands off approach, with only a few that I can recall that were removed, by their own doing.

It’s funny that DCT made post after post after post that was simply AI generated with no sources and not a peep from you or anyone else, which is fine, don’t need the help, lol. Thanks for proving my point again, if us rightys disagree with a post, we post rebuttals. It seems you only get involved in something like this when it’s a Reagan post, never ever seen you challenge some of the ridiculous posts from the leftys. As a moderator, either be fair or simply stay out of it.

[Hidden Content]

Thanks for proving my point, she could be right. Look at the information being posted and critique that before simply dismissing the source. I’m not sure why this is so hard.

Problem solved, they’re not eligible.

So which news sources would you consider a REAL source? Why is it that some “random” lady couldn’t possibly know the facts about something. And you are wrong, if a post is made and you think it’s wrong, don’t simply bash the source, provide evidence that it is wrong.

Reagan can make his own argument and IF they weren’t facts, simply dispute them with the real facts. There are several things that could depress me, but a sports forum (even being the best one ), ain’t one of them, lol.

Truth can come from any source, as can misinformation. I think most posts are made for discussion, not necessarily to claim without a doubt they are 100% accurate. Back to my original point, the debate shouldn’t end just because someone doesn’t like the source.

Not much surprises me when it comes to democrats, but I gotta admit, this one did a little bit. I never expected New Yorkers to embrace government dependency so much as to vote someone like this in, and he was very honest upfront about his intentions.

That the largest city in the US elected a democratic socialist (communist) as their mayor is a very big deal. Soon we’re gonna see just how big. Remember all the dimwits that were surprised at the direction biden took the country, same folks will be shocked, once again.

Yep, and the covid lies.

No comment on Mamdani’s pick, you know, what the thread is about. Every response of yours is about Trump, no matter what. And from the guy that hates whataboutisms, lol.

Not sure there is such a thing as a single verified source that I would trust, certainly not one from the government or mainstream media. There are lots of folks on social media that provide solid information backed up by research that lots of folks haven’t heard of.

Just because someone doesn’t challenge a post doesn’t mean they necessarily agree with it, not enough time in the day. How would verifying who Mila Joy is validate or disqualify hard numbers? Argue the content, not the source.

Agree 100%, been saying this forever. Don’t agree with a post, prove it wrong instead of wagging your finger at the source.

No one has said take something for facts simply because they post it, that’s what you said. I simply said don’t dismiss a post simply because you don’t know or like the source. That’s sad. Go to the trouble of looking into yourself and if you can prove it false, great. And as far as the personal attacks, that’s nothing I can fix, that falls to the moderators.

No really, post valid data that actually counters Reagan’s post.

Exactly right, even the National Enquirer scooped big stories, Rush Limbaugh, Tiger Woods and John Edwards. It’s easier to dismiss the source if you can’t dispute the information.

Doesn’t matter, if these aren’t facts, prove it.