LumRaiderFan

Bingo, she didn't have to sleep with millions, just the right one, Willie Brown. He was a very powerful California politician that I'm pretty sure didn't catch the attention of Harris due to his good looks, age or the fact that he was married, lol.

lol

This thread had nothing to do with Trump until you brought him up.

16 years next April.

I'll be curious to see if anything comes from this.

LOL LOL LOL See Hippy's post...you really are uninformed.

I could say the same about voting for Harris.

You know what else works if a a candidate wants the support of law enforcement, actually support law enforcement. You can't do this and expect real law enforcement groups to support you. Most police forces are underfunded already, and we have seen the disastrous results in cities that have actually cut funding for law enforcement. Just one more way Harris is trying to appear moderate. [Hidden Content] From the article: Vice President Kamala Harris voiced support for “defund the police” in a radio interview in June 2020 amidst nationwide protests for police reform, just months before denouncing the movement after she had joined the Biden presidential campaign. Harris said in the June radio interview the movement “rightly” called out the amount of money spent on police departments instead of community services such as education, housing, and healthcare, emphasizing that more police did not equate to more public safety. “This whole movement is about rightly saying, we need to take a look at these budgets and figure out whether it reflects the right priorities,” Harris said on a New York-based radio program “Ebro in the Morning” on June 9, 2020, adding that US cities were “militarizing police” but “defunding public schools.”

[Hidden Content] Shocker!! The left certainly doesn't want a level playing field, especially with this candidate. From the article: Google has featured Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign website in a more desirable location on its search engine results than former President Trump’s official site, according to a new study by the Media Research Center. "Google is trying to stack the deck in favor of Kamala Harris," Media Research Center founder Brent Bozell told Fox News Digital. "Google's search engine pushes left-wing media articles favoring Kamala Harris and slamming Donald Trump," he added. "Don't trust Google searches." MRC Free Speech America researchers analyzed the Sept. 6 search results of two separate searches: "Donald Trump presidential race 2024" and "Kamala Harris presidential race 2024." Google has featured Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign website in a more desirable location on its search engine results than former President Trump’s official site, according to a new study by the Media Research Center. The conservative media watchdog wanted to determine where Google Search would position each candidate’s presidential campaign website but found different results, which favored Harris. "In the past, Google buried the campaign websites of Republican candidates. Now the search giant very clearly pads its search results about political candidates with leftist legacy news articles, many of which are hostile to Republicans and either neutral or favorable toward Democrats," MRC Free Speech America associate editor Gabriela Pariseau wrote when recapping the findings. "Readers will have to sift through the biased news before they even see the organic results of their searches, let alone a candidate’s website," Pariseau continued. When searching for "Donald Trump presidential race 2024," the former president's campaign website appeared sixth in Google search results. "But before reaching Trump’s website, readers would see options to click on seven articles from left-wing sources. The New York Times, Politico and The Washington Post were listed under the ‘Top Stories’ panel," Pariseau wrote. "Once MRC researchers reached the actual search results, Google displayed a link to an article from The Economist titled ‘Donald Trump v Kamala Harris: who’s ahead in the polls?’ Additionally, the results showed CNN’s elections page along with a link to its live election updates. Google also displayed a link to NBC’s live election updates page," she added, noting that MRC NewsBusters Executive Editor Tim Graham found "blatant leftist bias" in many articles suggested by Google. However, when MRC Free Speech America researchers searched "Kamala Harris presidential race 2024," her campaign website was third in the organic Google search results. In addition, the articles that were suggested were largely from left-leaning outlets.

From the article: The Pact covers a broad range of issues including peace and security, sustainable development, climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender, youth and future generations, and the transformation of global governance. Scary list, and what's comical is the UN wants to lead the world on human rights, while allowing thuggish countries to chair committees, what a joke.

Doesn't have anything to do with Trump so they remain silent, I wouldn't want to have to defend democrat voting either.

Pay attention, folks, she hasn’t changed her opinion on anything. Kamala Harris is no moderate.

I really don't think he's worrying about this too much. [Hidden Content] From the article: GOVX polled nearly 20,000 members with military, first responder, and government service backgrounds on the upcoming election, and Trump has almost 70% of the vote. I would be interested to see a poll by these same folks on how they view the 700 folks you referenced.

The most annoying impediment to the democrat agenda.

Yeah, who wants a secure border or energy independence, this is so much better.

Only one teamster internal poll, Trump is way ahead. Pretty embarrassing for democrats to lose this one, but she’s a job killer.

[Hidden Content] From the article: Vice President Kamala Harris' tax plan could cost the U.S. economy nearly 800,000 jobs, a new analysis by the Tax Foundation finds. Harris' tax plan, which contains a variety of tax increases, cuts and credits, is based largely on President Biden's budget – though the vice president has offered her own policy ideas since becoming the Democratic presidential nominee. Overall, the Tax Foundation analysis finds a loss of 786,000 full-time equivalent jobs over the long run under Harris' plan when compared to baseline projections, as well as 2% decline in long-run GDP and a 1.2% dip in long-run wages, while bringing in nearly $1.7 trillion in additional tax revenue over the next decade. "Similar to the president's proposals, we find that it would reduce the long-term growth of the economy, it would reduce American incomes relative to where they would otherwise be, and it would lose, rounding up, close to 800,000 jobs in the long-run," Garrett Watson, senior policy analyst and modeling manager at the Tax Foundation, told FOX Business in an interview.

[Hidden Content] From the article: The International Brotherhood of Teamsters declined to endorse a presidential candidate on Wednesday after releasing internal polling that showed a majority of its members supported former President Donald Trump over Vice President Kamala Harris.

Somebody please tell Trump to stay out of Bridge City.

Murder the most innocent and spare the most guilty. smh...democrats

[Hidden Content] From the article: Policy flip-flops have put Vice President Kamala Harris in the hot seat in the key battleground state of Pennsylvania, with energy workers telling Fox News that "nobody believes" her change of heart on fracking. "I believe she's out there saying whatever she can to make people try to swing her way so that she can try to get the presidency," Chad Zboran, a Pennsylvania-based technical field trainer, told "Fox & Friends" co-host Lawrence Jones during a segment that aired Thursday. Sadly, this works on the low information fickle swing voters. She's got a record folks, take the time to look it up.

The democrat cycle: Promise to do the job, receive said job, screw the job up beyond repair, blame Republicans and claim only they can fix the problem they created OR cover it up… repeat

You're right, they were unarmed idiots acting out. The actual Marxists were burning federal buildings and actually were assaulting police in several states, all while being cheered on by several sitting members of Congress.

Come on, Reagan, it's a poll of 2500 🙂 folks run by a sky is falling organization and it clearly shows that Republicans think it's Trumps fault. Add to that it is CB approved...money!!!

So they took a survey of 2500 people and came up with this result, must be accurate. lol lol lol I have personally never talked to anyone that has that view.