LumRaiderFan

[Hidden Content] I'd like to here what our friends on the left have to say about this. From the article: As the U.S Treasury department issued a license to Chevron to drill for oil in Venezuela, relaxing 2019 sanctions applied to Venezuela under the Trump administration, Venezuelan dissidents are crying foul, reminding the world that the Maduro regime continues to engage in what are internationally recognized crimes against humanity. Officially, the landmark U.S. policy change was a response to the Maduro regime’s dialogue with the opposition regarding spending on a humanitarian budget. Yet the change in policy has left many Venezuelan activists and dissidents disillusioned given the ongoing human rights situation in the country. Venezuela remains the most egregious abuser of human rights in the Americas, and according to a U.N. report in 2019 is complicit in 7,000 cases of extrajudicial killings since mass protests began against the Maduro government.

So tell me what the federal government owes you, other than the freedom to thrive in this country? Please don’t give me the general welfare line.

The only thing possibly more powerful than TDS was RDS. 🙂

The federal government shouldn't have to do anything on your behalf. The negative liberties he refers to are saying our individual rights trump everything and shall not be infringed., he doesn't like that, calls it a negative when it is without a doubt, positive. He knew that statement would appeal to those that are looking to get something from government, but it's what you would expect from a community organizer that doesn't want to see folks standing on their own.

Still can’t address it, nothing but third grade posts about nothing.

Obama said the Constitution was a "Charter of negative liberties". You won't see any of the lefty scholars (is that really a thing?) on here wanting to discuss that, they certainly wouldn't when he was President. Now back to Trump.

No, it's not a cop out, it's real. There is no other explanation for the mindset you and others on here have that would explain away the dumpster fire we have going on now but continue to criticize only Donald Trump. It's real, and you have it.

I guess when it's all someone has.

Probably not too long, but never underestimate the ignorance of the left. [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] Seemed like a good idea at the time.

The video is over two minutes, you may be overestimating their attention span.

Shocker

lol, what a shallow, ignorant statement. How embarrassing for UT.

😂😂😂 TDS is sad, but kinda funny.

Hmmmmm? 🤔

But went completely different paths.

Biden’s son thinks he would do a better job than Trump.

Idiots being idiots. Charge them with the appropriate crime. Why would anyone 100% intent on taking Congress over and overturning the election not come in armed ready for resistance? It took them almost two years to come up with this and why anyone would have any confidence in this DOJ is beyond me. They had to have a win for the upcoming election. If Trump was out of the picture this never would have taken place. Not to worry, if things don't change we'll see the real deal and it won't look anything like this cluster we saw on Jan 6.

Were these guys armed with flagpoles or umbrellas, I forget. Poor suckers are taking the fall for this and only fools that believe this was an actual insurrection and attempted overthrow of the government are buying it. They're coming...Trump is next!

Agree, TVC swung his argument pretty wide on that one. I see a big difference in a procedural mistake in an arrest and unlawful search based on no real evidence.

Like a million other things, government should have no say in marriage, no telling you who you can and can't marry, and no tax advantages or disadvantages based on marital status. Problem solved.

What's her stance? What is she standing up for or against? Answer the question.

I'm not giving up any of my rights, and if the police violate my rights knowingly then there definitely should be a penalty, cops should be punished, no doubt. But if a police officer makes a minor mistake such as paperwork in an arrest, I can't see that being grounds to allow a criminal with proof of the crime to go free.

As it should be with rational folks. Someone guilty should not be set free because someone made a technical mistake in the process. Remove or discipline that person if necessary and move forward. I understand that's not how it is, but I certainly don't have to like it, and I'm sure there are plenty of victims of folks that were released on technicalities that like it even less. There are plenty of things that are legal that don't benefit a society.

Liberals love to rewrite history, this is a classic example. Another is planned parenthood (more accurately planned genocide) They embrace the institution of planned parenthood while ignoring the reason it was established by margaret sanger, AND is still very effective in accomplishing it's original intent, sadly.