LumRaiderFan

So would I, we certainly don’t need a disgruntled war monger as POTUS.

[Hidden Content]

Moderates googling "who is John Bolton" as we speak.

Probably right, sad that we have to work around low information moderates. It is what it is, we gotta deal with it.

[Hidden Content]

The candidate that endorses it, or someone that may have been involved with some. One makes current policy and one made some bad life choices, those poisons are pretty far apart. Stick to your guns though, and vote for the guy that’s proud of it.

You need to go back and research what he actually meant. [Hidden Content] From the article: Obama in his interview disparages the Constitution as merely "a charter of negative liberties. It says what the states can't do to you. Says what the federal government can't do to you but doesn't say what the federal government or state government must do on your behalf." He believes—and he's right—that changing this is the way to bring about "redistributive change."

Yeah, maybe we should join join the party that endorses it because some in our party have had some in the past. We’re not letting go and I assure you the unborn appreciate it.

If you’re gonna do it, do it both ways. It will make the debate even less. Remove Trump bashing and the left won’t have much to say about their guy.

So everyone that has had an abortion or paid for one in their past is pro abortion? You need to check you facts on that one.

Funny that half the political threads turn into a Trump bashing fest and you show no concern. It’s politics, no need for biased moderation.

Yes it is, political threads move all over the place.

There was a thread about the misgivings of Warnok and for some reason you saw no reason to comment but you were all over the Walker thread. At least folks on the right participate in all threads, unlike your group.

It’s how the forum works, deal with it.

I certainly hope not but I never underestimate the ignorance of moderates.

We were energy independent less that 3 years ago but somehow folks can't determine that was the lesser of two evils. The lesser of all evils is to drill for our own oil, but we'll need an R in office for that.

Democrat preachers certainly have a conundrum.

So this was a great energy option for us? And do you seriously believe there is no financial gain for this thuggish regime. This was about sanctions for crimes against humanity, and that hasn’t changed. What did change, oh yeah, the President.

Maybe so, I would just like for them to tell me why the policies biden has put forth has worked well for this country. They can't, so they choose to takes shots at anything Trump.

It's also strange that folks can somehow rationalize a Southern Baptist preacher that is pro-abortion. Must be some strange sermons coming from that "church".

What are you talking about, THAT was a soundbite to you? You answer a question for once, what were the negative liberties obama was talking about and be specific about what you feel the federal government is supposed to do for you. Also tell me what you feel the cost of freedom is.

It’s a shame that the lefties on here only want to talk about Trump, can’t seem to find time to talk about the many disastrous policies put forth by biden.

You haven’t said anything bad about him either, but plenty to say about Walker. Own your bias, you’re not fooling anyone with your backpedaling.

I never knew Venezuelan oil was more environmentally friendly than ours. Still waiting on a response from our friends on the left.

Patriots willing to sacrifice everything, including their lives.