LumRaiderFan

Can't agree with this one. You can't simply choose an age that you think someone may no longer be competent for a job...there's no set age for mental degradation and you could be throwing out a lot of wisdom while at the same time having "young and qualified" fools in office that have no better qualification than simply age. We already have a mechanism in place to take care of situations like Biden, the Republicans just simply won't apply it as the Democrats tried (complete circus) on Trump.

Typical, turn it around so you don't have to defend what you said...like I said, sad little pathetic world.

I took away EXACTLY what you said, at least be man enough to stand behind what you say.

You don't leech on social security, genius...you've already paid for it. Sad thing is, it will be gone for you because of your party.

Wow, calling brave men and women that VOLUNTEER to serve their great country out of a sense of duty and patriotism brainwashed...sad world you live in.

From the article: We need to think about climate. For those of us that are from the south, we know this really, really well. So it just started getting hot in the south? 🤦‍♂️

[Hidden Content]

Bad idea, if you're going to the trouble to amend the Constitution, put in term limits. Accumulation of power, not age, is the problem. Look at AOC, she's young, you want more of those?

People choose strange champions these days.

[Hidden Content] So will this make the public safer? Sorry your house is burning down, we'll try to get someone over...not to worry, they'll be vaccinated.

Wow, that could have turned out a lot worse than it did.

I’m always on the side of less action from our government.

I don’t think they did anything illegal, I simply think the leeway given to law enforcement to do this is wrong and shouldn’t be allowed. How much money I choose to travel with is my business and I shouldn’t have to explain the why to anyone. This no doubt gets abused, Jeff Davis Parish, LA comes to mind.

There is no need for this to turn into a bash the cops thread, no one has more respect for law enforcement than me. It's just that a situation like this where someone did nothing wrong other than it was decided he was carrying too much money and his reasoning for it didn't sit well with local law enforcement so we're going to confiscate it even though no crime was committed. He may turn out to be a major league drug dealer...bust him when he breaks the law. Question for TVC, who keeps the money if it turned out it was tied to a crime?

No need to start making good decisions now...smh.

[Hidden Content] She wants everybody in jail...from the article: Michigan school officials could still face charges following the tragic Oxford High School shooting last week that left four students dead and seven other people injured. "It’s possible, yes," Oakland County Prosecutor Karen McDonald said on NBC’s "Today" show when asked if it was "possible that school officials could face charges."

We already have a law, the 4th Amendment. Simply follow it to the letter. I wouldn't call this pissing and moaning, I'd call it righteous indignation.

That's my point, that these guys thought the story was BS is not good evidence imo.

I just don’t agree that they can make it their business as to why he’s carrying this money and can hold him until they decide it’s ok that he has it. Seems he’s guilty until they decide he’s innocent. Maybe I’m just sick and tired of any government overreach these days.

Why did they stop him?

If I want to drive around with $100,000, I shouldn’t be subject to arrest by folks that haven’t proven a crime from where the money came from or where they “think” it’s going. There is enough crime out there, no need to manufacture it.

Why does his excuse for carrying the money have to make sense to them?

What do you think made them feel they had a right to confiscate this money? Surely it’s not simply like what you said earlier, that they “think” he was going to buy drugs.

Let’s be clear, the democrat speaker of the house.