LumRaiderFan

Not when you're dealing with rational reasonable folks, efficacy and results are all that matter, and that's how you get their approval. Tell me what Harris policies you approve of and why.

[Hidden Content] lol, let's not let facts get in the way of a narrative. I can already hear the shrill voices, "THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION???"

Are you one of those I see alone in a car with a mask on?

Wrong again, had he not shut down foreign flights while being called a xenophobe by your party, it would have been much worse. And I see you still think painters masks and 6 feet would have stopped transmission, smh. His doubt and confusion you refer to are probably low cost solutions that were proven to be effective but couldn't make money for big pharma. You would do well to read RFK's book on Fauci rather than spew democrat talking points that are untrue.

There you go again, you know he left in the middle of covid, but choose to leave that little detail out. But keep watching, you'll learn something.

lol, wow!

Compare his term with the one we now have with an open mind, that should do it. Energy, border, unemployment, SCJ picks, the list could go on and on. For you to make the statement that he doesn't talk policy is simply childish.

And anyone that pays attention knows this, hard to reason with someone that falsely claims otherwise.

Absolutely nothing you said here was correct.

That seems to be an impossibility for many, sadly.

Agree 100%, we're told we have a candidate problem and anyone besides Trump would be a cake walk, which is nonsense. We have a voter problem in that some folks are incapable of looking at the last two administrations and having their vote decided by results. Add to that, many vote based on what the government can provide for them as in entitlements, student loan forgiveness, etc, Trump will be gone soon, but these voters will remain, and then another boogyman will have to be created to excuse their ignorance.

You were on here bragging about how Biden had paid off your student debt because you failed to pay it off. You’re welcome.

That’s all the democrats are capable of, they trade giveaways for votes. Their supporters can’t name any policies that are actually good for THE COUNTRY, they are only good for the takers, compliments of the makers.

Then it’s simple, don’t vote for him in November. Enough said.

They make themselves feel better and smarter by simply saying “but we have hope”.

lol, one group is about energy independence, secure borders, fear from rogue nations and conservative SCJs. The uninformed idiot group says “but we have hope”. 🤮

Politics is very simple, two choices in November, all the nonsense doesn’t change that.

That I was forced to pay for because you refused to.

High school, lol.

No, we just want it left to the states to decide if an innocent child dies or not , we know what the federal government will decide.

[Hidden Content] From the article: A retired police lieutenant in Minnesota is pushing back against the narrative that Gov. Tim Walz is a "moderate" and tells Fox News Digital that the governor "intentionally" let Minneapolis burn during the 2020 riots because he "truly doesn’t like police." "He is not a moderate, he has never been a moderate and here in Minnesota he has been anti-police, he has raised taxes, he is nowhere near being a moderate," retired Minnesota State Patrol Lt. John Nagel told Fox News Digital. "He’s anti-police, defund the police, when you have police families, and we have an officer killed in the line of duty, when that family looks at the governor and says we don't want you at the funeral. That should tell you a great deal of how law enforcement in general feels about Walz." Last year, the widow of Pope County Sheriff’s Deputy Josh Owen, who was killed in the line of duty responding to a domestic violence call, told Walz he was not invited to her late husband’s funeral because "he does not support law enforcement," Alpha News reported.

I did, I'm not talking about the DUI, he has lots of other baggage from lying about his military record to his horrible handling of Covid, as well as other policies he has put forth that have been mentioned on the forum. Look it up for yourself if you're interested.

I believe I'm putting more stock as far as how she will lead in her past record, not what she is saying in the 11th hour to appease the fickle swing voters.

It was a strange pick to me when they had to know all the stuff that would come out.

Sounds like the job she did as border czar.