LumRaiderFan

Come on, man, they simply came from the middle east to work the sugar harvest.

Why don't you address the subject of the thread, but I'm not wasting much time on someone that won't deal with facts and simply bashes the source or calls a valid post political wrangling. Answer a question for a change and try to leave Trump out of it.

The US has no respect around the world with the current administration and it won't be any better if Harris is elected. Iran, and similar countries, only understand strength, which is not being projected at all from Washington. We've proven that bad players like this can't be appeased by pallets of cash.

Loved watching him play.

[Hidden Content] Can't make this up...from the article: A U.N. human rights group confirmed Hamas’ leader in Lebanon, who was recently killed by Israeli strikes, was their employee. Fateh Sherif was killed Monday in an airstrike on the al-Bass refugee camp in the southern Lebanese city of Tyre, along with his wife and children. The United Nations Relief and Works Agency (UNRWA) noted that Sherif had been on suspension with the organization since March but had not been fired.

Must be tough to go through life ashamed of what you supposedly stand for.

[Hidden Content] From the article: John Kerry called the First Amendment a "major block" to combating misinformation and fighting climate change. The former Secretary of State took part in a World Economic Forum panel on Green Energy on Wednesday. Near the end of the panel, a member of the audience asked what can be done to push back against disinformation surrounding climate change online. "You know there's a lot of discussion now about how you curb those entities in order to guarantee that you're going to have some accountability on facts, etc. But look, if people only go to one source, and the source they go to is sick, and, you know, has an agenda, and they're putting out disinformation, our First Amendment stands as a major block to be able to just, you know, hammer it out of existence," Kerry said. 🤦‍♂️

Classic truth.

The democrat motto.

To keep Californians out, they’re more dangerous than illegals.

I hear snowflakes melting.

[Hidden Content]

I bet this is more profitable than Solyndra stock.

Colorado definitely has a border.

Bingo, she didn't have to sleep with millions, just the right one, Willie Brown. He was a very powerful California politician that I'm pretty sure didn't catch the attention of Harris due to his good looks, age or the fact that he was married, lol.

lol

This thread had nothing to do with Trump until you brought him up.

16 years next April.

I'll be curious to see if anything comes from this.

LOL LOL LOL See Hippy's post...you really are uninformed.

I could say the same about voting for Harris.

You know what else works if a a candidate wants the support of law enforcement, actually support law enforcement. You can't do this and expect real law enforcement groups to support you. Most police forces are underfunded already, and we have seen the disastrous results in cities that have actually cut funding for law enforcement. Just one more way Harris is trying to appear moderate. [Hidden Content] From the article: Vice President Kamala Harris voiced support for “defund the police” in a radio interview in June 2020 amidst nationwide protests for police reform, just months before denouncing the movement after she had joined the Biden presidential campaign. Harris said in the June radio interview the movement “rightly” called out the amount of money spent on police departments instead of community services such as education, housing, and healthcare, emphasizing that more police did not equate to more public safety. “This whole movement is about rightly saying, we need to take a look at these budgets and figure out whether it reflects the right priorities,” Harris said on a New York-based radio program “Ebro in the Morning” on June 9, 2020, adding that US cities were “militarizing police” but “defunding public schools.”

[Hidden Content] Shocker!! The left certainly doesn't want a level playing field, especially with this candidate. From the article: Google has featured Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign website in a more desirable location on its search engine results than former President Trump’s official site, according to a new study by the Media Research Center. "Google is trying to stack the deck in favor of Kamala Harris," Media Research Center founder Brent Bozell told Fox News Digital. "Google's search engine pushes left-wing media articles favoring Kamala Harris and slamming Donald Trump," he added. "Don't trust Google searches." MRC Free Speech America researchers analyzed the Sept. 6 search results of two separate searches: "Donald Trump presidential race 2024" and "Kamala Harris presidential race 2024." Google has featured Vice President Kamala Harris’ campaign website in a more desirable location on its search engine results than former President Trump’s official site, according to a new study by the Media Research Center. The conservative media watchdog wanted to determine where Google Search would position each candidate’s presidential campaign website but found different results, which favored Harris. "In the past, Google buried the campaign websites of Republican candidates. Now the search giant very clearly pads its search results about political candidates with leftist legacy news articles, many of which are hostile to Republicans and either neutral or favorable toward Democrats," MRC Free Speech America associate editor Gabriela Pariseau wrote when recapping the findings. "Readers will have to sift through the biased news before they even see the organic results of their searches, let alone a candidate’s website," Pariseau continued. When searching for "Donald Trump presidential race 2024," the former president's campaign website appeared sixth in Google search results. "But before reaching Trump’s website, readers would see options to click on seven articles from left-wing sources. The New York Times, Politico and The Washington Post were listed under the ‘Top Stories’ panel," Pariseau wrote. "Once MRC researchers reached the actual search results, Google displayed a link to an article from The Economist titled ‘Donald Trump v Kamala Harris: who’s ahead in the polls?’ Additionally, the results showed CNN’s elections page along with a link to its live election updates. Google also displayed a link to NBC’s live election updates page," she added, noting that MRC NewsBusters Executive Editor Tim Graham found "blatant leftist bias" in many articles suggested by Google. However, when MRC Free Speech America researchers searched "Kamala Harris presidential race 2024," her campaign website was third in the organic Google search results. In addition, the articles that were suggested were largely from left-leaning outlets.

From the article: The Pact covers a broad range of issues including peace and security, sustainable development, climate change, digital cooperation, human rights, gender, youth and future generations, and the transformation of global governance. Scary list, and what's comical is the UN wants to lead the world on human rights, while allowing thuggish countries to chair committees, what a joke.

Doesn't have anything to do with Trump so they remain silent, I wouldn't want to have to defend democrat voting either.