LumRaiderFan

[Hidden Content] From the article: Vice President Kamala Harris' selection of Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate two weeks out from the Democratic National Convention comes as a bit of a "shock," and GOP strategists suggest it could hurt her in key battleground states like Pennsylvania, where Gov. Josh Shapiro was purported to have been the favored choice. "Kamala Harris did not pick Josh Shapiro because antisemitic progressives did not like that he is Jewish," Mike Berg, spokesperson for the National Republican Senatorial Committee told Fox News Digital in a statement. "It was Harris' first major decision as the nominee, and she caved to the pro-Hamas contingency within the Democratic Party." Berg continued that Walz "reinforces" Harris' "biggest weaknesses: crime and immigration."

[Hidden Content] From the article: Several liberal media figures expressed concern when word came out that Vice President Kamala Harris selected Minnesota Gov. Tim Walz as her running mate, with some pundits questioning the "weird" choice. Harris, the Democratic Party's presidential nominee, chose Walz over Pennsylvania Gov. Josh Shapiro, who was considered to be the top contender. "My fears about Harris are that she is incredibly bad at public speaking, and that she reliably makes bad political decisions. So far, she has done nothing to allay either fear. I’m not saying she can’t win, but I wish she gave me more confidence," Washington Post columnist Megan McArdle wrote. lol

Can you show me where Republicans have blamed Harris for the stock market correction? If you recall, the implosion was due to Covid, but you know this already, as well as the fact that the Republicans aren't blaming Harris for the correction. You don't make these lying points for any other reason than to troll, you add absolutely nothing to the political forum, which has without a doubt gone downhill.

We knew she couldn't choose the Jewish guy, their "progressive" base wouldn't have it.

So what's your point? You seem to think it should be one way or the other? Reasonable folks know some things should change and others should remain as they are. It's a shame if you don't know what he is referring to by progressives and conservatives in the current political landscape, but then again, we've seen you transform from a self-proclaimed conservative into a democrat progressive apologist, all because Donald Trump took over your life. Sad...but a little funny.

If you want to call posting negative information about the other side smearing, I get you, but I would call it something to be challenged by someone with a differing view. Can't argue that the political forum has declined when I used to debate bullets, TX Hoops on issues and could have differing views on stuff but always ended respectfully. Reagan does post a lot, buts it's usually articles from different sources rather than simply his opinion...whether you agree with the sources or not. I have seen many articles from sources like the gateway pundit that I knew to be true, but they get dismissed as nonsense simply because of the source, without those saying it even bothering to look into the article. I get called a red hatted fool, Trump worshipper, etc. simply because I agree with some of his policies even though I can't stand the guy, but when the debate is derailed with "you simply worship the guy and see no wrong", the discussion is done. Then there are the flat out lies, nazi, insurrection, end of democracy, shutting down the voting system, hates black folks, hates Hispanics, just ad nauseum. So I agree, the political forum has gone downhill and is no longer capable of supporting debate, which is sad. I can make a reasonable case of why I can support Trump and have many times, all while not liking the guy one bit, it's simply the best of the two choices. But I can't do this without hearing the red hatted fool, Trump worshipper, and what I never hear is a reasonable explanation from the other side as to why they will support Biden/Harris...ever. I say negative stuff about Biden and Harris all the time, simply show me where I'm wrong, it's not smearing.

Funny how you single out one poster and can ignore others, but, it's not surprising. Seems personal.

Great leadership, unlike what we have now.

[Hidden Content] She's not dangerous, she's just a little goofy. That's what folks in the clown squad would have us believe. From the article: A clip of Vice President Kamala Harris from 2017 calling on "everybody" to be "woke" resurfaced on social media, sparking critics and conservatives to lambaste the official Democratic nominee as a "Communist functionary" who is "too radical" to serve as president. "We have to stay woke. Like everybody needs to be woke. And you can talk about if you're the wokest or woker, but just stay more woke than less woke," then-Sen. Harris said in 2017 during Recode's annual Code Conference, alongside philanthropist Laurene Powell Jobs, the widow of Apple co-founder Steve Jobs, during the conference. The conference focused on issues such as immigration and the environment, including Harris speaking out against the Trump administration's drug policies and immigration polices just moments ahead of her call on Americans to be "woke."

ok

They’re ok, Reagan, they’re just a little goofy.

Me too, lol.

Like I have said for years, our problem isn’t the candidates, we can survive them, it’s the low information dependent voter, they’re nothing going anywhere.

True story, sad that so many place no value on that type of strength.

It’s a shame that you have to explain this, not that it will do any good.

[Hidden Content] smh

[Hidden Content] From the article: Former House Speaker Nancy Pelosi mused Sunday morning that President Biden could be added to Mount Rushmore after choosing to step out of the 2024 race. 🤣🤣 🤣 I will agree with Pelosi, his Presidency has certainly been "consequential", but nothing that would earn a Rushmore spot.

lol

Probably the same reason Lia Thomas lost sometimes.

Good discussion , glad you wanted to debate.

Probably to make it fair. He’s definitely not scared of Harris in a debate, but the democrats sure are, lol.

You have no idea and neither do I. Don’t act like you do. He/she was banned from the IBA for failing gender testing, no red flag with you?

He’s not scared to debate that idiot, that’s for sure.

[Hidden Content]# Why did he/she fail gender testing and get banned by the IBA? Are we supposed to trust the same sickos that ridiculed The Last Supper with drag queens? At least be willing to question your side every now.

Outstanding game plan and execution, more young folks should apply this type of discipline and sacrifice.