LumRaiderFan

Well, I do! Welfare is unconstitutional, Obamacare is unconstitutional. Lots of things the Fed Gov control now is unconstitutional. The Constitution gives the Fed Gov VERY limited powers, and what is not given to them falls to the states. The Feds have been slowly chipping away at that for years while folks sit by and go, oh well, who am I to say what is or isn't Constitutional. Sad that you don't feel you have the ability to question decisions that lawmakers make, but the Fed Gov appreciates you.

[Hidden Content]

Of course I would...that's our rulebook. The SC also says it's OK to kill babies...unlike you, I don't agree with anything they spew out just because they are "scholars". I guess if the SC ruled that slavery was OK you would go along with it? The interpretation of any case is based solely on whether the SC is tilted conservative or liberal...if these folks were all experts and knew it all, the vote would always be 9-0.

You knew what? By the way, have you ever read the Constitution?

[Hidden Content]

Federal gov should have no role in food stamps or any other entitlement, whether it's a good or bad investment...not in the Constitution. States and communities have the right to provide whatever incentives or entitlements they want, whether it's a good or bad investment...it's THEIR right. Let me ask you this, who should have the power to keep a state or city from providing tax incentives?

[Hidden Content] Amazon seems to blame liberals.

Don't need this guy...not sure he would govern much different than a Democrat.

Local/State government should be able to provide any incentive they choose. Are you saying a city shouldn't be able to provide tax incentives to bring in business?

How about let states and communities work their own deal as they see fit...you know, the free market. Sounds like you were involved in negotiating a bad deal.

Agree, but all they see is the big bad company getting tax breaks, never mind the taxes and local spending that 25,000 workers and their families provide.

smh...what was the motive here? Publicity? Trump hater? Both?

It’s all about getting Trump, no matter the means. Kinda like Obamacare.

Sure wasn’t conservatives that drove them out of New York. You should be in charge of economic development in New York...you would be great. I agree with Bobcat, bring it to Texas...we’ll figure out how to handle all those issues that puzzle libs.

There are so many 1. Married to Bill 2. Clinton Foundation 3. Benghazi 4. Email scandal 5. Steele dossier 6. Whitewater 7. Travelgate 8. The respectful way she handled the women that Bill raped. I'm sure I've left some of her redeeming qualities out...there are so many.

Yep, they had to hurry up and vote on that one to find out what was in it.

Mission accomplished, liberals.

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] Wouldn't it be great to have constituents that didn't know or care when you say stuff like this?

I would ask our Democrats to explain this swing in thinking but....

[Hidden Content] Libs not wanting to have sex because of Trump means less little libs...lets just pray he's in office 2 terms. From the article: Dr. Susan Block, a sex therapist known for her HBO appearances, best-selling books, and appearances on TV networks such as Oprah, believes if you're not getting intimate these days, it is all because of the negative vibes she sees emanating from 1600 Pennsylvania Ave. “It has had a big impact. For some people Trump's campaign and presidency has created a type of PTSD — what I call ‘Post-Trump Sex Disorder’,” she said during an interview with Salon, a liberal publication.

4 dead Americans and a coverup...no collusion...see the difference. I understand you don't question the action and results of government, that's the difference between conservatives and liberals.

[Hidden Content] The Green Deal and Democrats trying to explain support hide it deserves its own thread.

[Hidden Content] Great move

Benghazi was a coverup...this latest is a witch-hunt that has proved nothing. Like I said, clueless.