LumRaiderFan

Maybe because of the ridiculous corporate tax rate, maybe because of the years and years of testing and tens of millions of dollars required to approve a product. And once approved, if anything goes wrong the ambulance chasers swoop in and sue the heck out of a company requiring them to carry ridiculous liability insurance. All things approved of by your party, who has a hatred for big pharma.

Competition in the private market is what has made this country the greatest in the world., shame that you can't see that. You can throw out all these types of stats you want, when the wealthy in any area of the world is ill and needs the best care, they come here. Don't you get tired of downgrading America?

Can't make this up...unbelievable. That is simply waking up in victim mode.

[Hidden Content] Can’t blame them...Dems don’t like hard questions. Pathetic

[Hidden Content] These New Democrats / Socialists / radical muslims are a cancer. They have no desire to move this country forward. All they want to do is destroy Trump and anyone associated with him.

Most everyone respects his service, doesn’t mean his squishy moderate politics are beyond criticism.

Obama had one purpose...single payer. Republicans have been trying to allow competition across all states for years. The Dems didn’t want any of that, because it was still privatized and not under the thumb of the fed gov. Remember Obama telling the woman’s mother she may have to take a pill instead of receiving an operation...there was a glimpse of Obamacare straight from the liars mouth.

Agree...folks should think about that.

[Hidden Content] She just can't get over it.

I would say the effects of Obamacare are relevant, wouldn't you? And I seem to recall you bringing up 2007 several times...which way do you want it?

Patience...the promise isn't broken until he's gone. Such as the promises Nash pointed out that Obama clearly broke. (more like flat out lies) [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] smh

I understand what the law is, but you will never keep someone from acquiring a weapon if they want one...ever. If they are too dangerous to be trusted with a weapon, better keep them locked up as has been mentioned here earlier. This is a post about opinions, not the standing law, although I can definitely understand folks that feel these rights should never be restored.

Every since AOC did her little protest sit in, I figured the Dems would take her out for making the old heads look bad. Might be a little more difficult now that she’s gathering more support...but I’m sure they’ll get it done if she continues.

I will clarify that I think they should be allowed to vote after they have served their time.

I agree to a point with Mat...if they pay their debt to society, I lean towards return all their rights. The violent offender is a tough one. If they get out after a lengthy sentence and they want a gun they’ll get one. I would have a hard time not enabling someone to protect themselves but I can certainly understand someones point that feels they lose these rights.

Good grief...unbelievable.

She was elected in an area that is becoming more and more radicalized. This will only increase unless we wake up.

Agree, this poor kid had to make a tough decision because of this nonsense. Wonder how long it will be before we see guys in high school softball and volleyball. Can’t deny them, right? [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

Hmmm, wouldn’t we want to look at the pusher before blaming the window? Same old gun argument.

[Hidden Content]

Definitely fire him!

Doubtful, your side is the one that simply can’t accept defeat. And he will win again, we’re not so far gone as to vote in any of the loons on your side.