LumRaiderFan

So sorry...continued prayers for strength and healing for your family.

I'm sure they hate that he won't just be "Presidential" and take whatever crap they want to shovel on him.

This lady is crazy, and I agree with your first post, this is child abuse, plain and simple. I can't imagine the hell this Dad is going through, especially if she is successful in her efforts.

Sadly, that might be the best solution for this kid.

Liberalism is without a doubt, a mental disorder. From the article: The boy was diagnosed with gender dysphoria by a gender transition therapist the mother, a pediatrician, chose for her son to see. According to the therapist's notes, the boy chose to identify as a girl when he was in sessions alone with his mother; alternatively, he chose to identify as a boy when he was in sessions alone with his father. What a tragic situation for this kid to have to live in.

And I’m right....choose a side. It’s easy to be a moderate and pick at both sides.

Yeah, it was knee jerk and you know it...go ahead and admit it and move on, otherwise some things will never change.

lol...you were ready to remove her privileges and I'm the one that knee jerks. I really don't care if she continues to work in the administration or not, but I'm willing to wait and let the facts come out. I would imagine you would want the same consideration given to you and your career.

Ivanka. Be specific...there hasn't been any kind of investigation and you are already wanting to have her privileges revoked. Maybe she's guilty of doing what every staffer has always done, but don't you think you need more evidence than what you have read in the news to revoke her clearance? Or do you have inside knowledge we don't at this time?

Can you give us an explanation of what she did wrong and what rules she has broken?

I don’t think Ivanka was/is SOS.

[Hidden Content]

Happy Thanksgiving to everyone.

[Hidden Content] Here we go. Wonder why no interest in emails by the Dems until now?

Bludgeoned himself to death? Tough dude.

[Hidden Content]

And we agree again...I never classify someone an idiot or dumb because I may disagree with them. Lots of folks on both sides are smart and plenty of idiots on both sides. The idiot part oftentimes comes in when it gets heated and someone has no other comeback than to act a fool.

Neither am I...if you've been on the board for a while, (and I know you have) myself and several other conservatives on here have hammered the Republicans quite often. Democrats, however, usually provide plenty to be disgusted over, such as the Kavanaugh Senate hearing.

If you question is whether or not I can be civil with someone I disagree with politically, them my answer is yes. To your point about whether anyone has our back...I don't need anyone to have my back...all I need is gov to stop intruding in my daily life. Donald Trump has basically removed many of the regulations that ham-stringed the economy and look at it go. When you have a great economy, no one needs to have your back...that shouldn't even be a mindset for Americans, but due to generations of liberal entitlement policies, it is infused in many folks way of life...they are looking for someone to go to Washington and FIGHT for them...geeez. No one in Washington needs to have your back, the folks I want to see up there are those that want to make the fed gov as small as possible...very insignificant in my daily life. (I know, I'm dreaming) I have discussions with folks I disagree with all the time, but there are many core value issues that can't be compromised, that was my main point. I will disagree on your last statement...it is as simple as right and wrong in my mind.

How would you compromise with this? (This list could be endless) [Hidden Content] From the article: Mayor Bill de Blasio cited his "socialistic impulse" in describing an ideal world where New York City government has control over all land and buildings in his city. “I think people all over this city, of every background, would like to have the city government be able to determine which building goes where, how high it will be, who gets to live in it, what the rent will be,” de Blasio said in a wide-ranging interview with New York Magazine. “I think there’s a socialistic impulse, which I hear every day, in every kind of community that they would like things to be planned in accordance to their needs.” FYI...the Socialist creed. From each according to his ability, to each according to his needs. Hmmmmm...the makers = ability...the takers = needs.

No, it's not possible, because if I am against illegal immigration, welfare, or obamacare, I'm considered a racist. I don't let it bother me but the days of reaching across the aisle are over. (It never was very effective anyway) The left (Democrats) are a party to be defeated, not compromised with. How many abortions are OK to be included in a compromise? How many billions in welfare are OK to be included in a compromise. How many illegal immigrants coming in the country are OK to be included in a compromise? How many "assault" weapons are OK to have taken off the market in a compromise? Again, The Democrats are not to be compromised with, all their ideas are destructive to the country...they are to be defeated. They want to lead us down the path of Socialism...I don't want to compromise on how far down that path to go.

[Hidden Content] From the article: “Maybe instead of Republicans drooling over every minute of footage of me in slow-mo, waiting to chop up word slips that I correct in real-tomd (sic),” she wrote, “they [should] actually step up enough to make the argument they want to make: that they don’t believe people deserve a right to healthcare.” She makes this way too easy.

[Hidden Content]

We still talking about this? Bo Jackson...debate over. If Bo decided he wanted to be a boxer, he would have been the heavyweight champion.

Wow, things won’t get better until the $harptons, Je$$ees, and you are gone. It would be better for you to pray for those that live with you.