LumRaiderFan

LOL...we're hypocrites when it's decided it's time to hit back. Dems don't like it when someone fights back...Trump is proving that very well.

Absolutely right...and all this coming from the party of tolerance.

Remember how nuts the dems were about the Sarah Palin's target nonsense? Now when THEY actually incite violence, no problem.

Sad, but very true.

[Hidden Content] From the article: Democratic Rep. Maxine Waters of California over the weekend sought to bring the 'resistance' to a new level when she urged supporters to swarm Cabinet members at gas stations and anywhere else they're seen. "If you see anybody from that Cabinet in a restaurant, in a department store, at a gasoline station, you get out and you create a crowd and you push back on them and you tell them they’re not welcome anymore, anywhere," Waters said. Maxine Waters is as dumb as a hammer and a racist to boot, but she knows better and I think she should be charged with a crime.

He’s been very successful at duping low information voters for many years.

[Hidden Content]

To be fair, Englebert, how would you like to be saddled with the enormous task of backing up democrat talking points? That is reserved for only the most highly skilled, such as Bill Clinton, who could muddy the water on even what the meaning of the word "is" is. Of course, it makes the task much easier with the right audience.

[Hidden Content] From the article: Texas-based Southwest Key Programs has taken in roughly $1 billion in federal contracts since the Obama administration, and is expected to receive about $500 million this year to house and provide services for immigrant children, according to reports. And Southwest officials receive significant compensation for their efforts. WQAD reportedtax filings show Juan Sanchez, the group’s founder and CEO, received nearly $1.5 million in 2016 - nearly twice the previous year’s salary, of $786,822. His wife, Jennifer, vice president of Southwest Key, received about $280,000 in 2015 in total compensation, WQAD reported.

Earn the vote to many = How much can you give me? As long as this mindset remains, we will always have a debt problem. Earn my vote = make gov as small as possible and don't intrude in my life.

PamFam and Kountzer, do you agree with Nash’s post? If not, why?

That’s quite a list.

We gave Obama 8 years of failure, even rewarded him with a Nobel peace prize for nothing. Since Trump has made more progress in such a short period of time, why not give him the benefit of the doubt.

Oh they will...the left will try to spin it like it started after Trump took office. Their advantage will be sponges that don’t really pay attention to hard news but opt to go with the latest sound bite. AKA low information voters.

I’d have to say that’s a drop the mic statement. Libs love to preach about morality and conveniently ignore the casual decision to murder the most innocent, and pass it off as a choice or planned parenthood.

If someone breaks the law and goes to jail, it is them that are punishing their children, no one else. That’s what is wrong in so many areas...we don’t seem to want to place blame on those that actually deserve it. This is not as simple as simply deporting entire familes, but I’ll throw it back to you, what would your solution be?

So if a parent breaks the law in the US, say shoplifting, should they not be arrested and subject to separation from their children simply because they have kids?

It wouldn’t even be a situation if Clinton was president.

Very true...the good thing is Trump couldn’t care less. He doesn’t fold just because because of criticism from the media and left. In fact, that’s a good barometer for success.

He gets something you yourself said was huge and it’s still not enough...and he’s still negotiating. I guess he’ll have to get something huge huge before the Trump haters take notice.

The Jews worshipped every day...rested one.

Worshipping on Sunday won’t keep you out of Heaven...it’s not a Kingdom issue. Cut out the legalism, just get them in the door...you’re sounding like a Pharisee.

You posted, " Your comprehension is way off. " I responded with what I perceived as Nash's comprehension on the subject and asked you to clarify why you felt he was "way off". I'm still waiting on your opinion on why he was way off.

[Hidden Content]

Correct...14% is a much more acceptable "fair share" that 4%. 4% would be considered crumbs.