LumRaiderFan

[Hidden Content] Like this guy was. The liberals one-sided fake outrage is really pathetic.

[Hidden Content] From the article: The city’s recently enacted minimum wage law is also having an impact on the housing problem. In 2014, Seattle’s extremely progressive City Council attempted to regulate prosperity by instituting a $15 minimum wage, to be gradually phased in. Business owners warned about the economic impact the move would have, but not one person on the City Council listened. All voted for the job-killing regulation, showing no one on the Council has a basic understanding of economics. This year the full $15 per hour minimum wage went into effect, but the impact was felt much earlier. A University of Washington team completed a study of worker pay, hours and benefits in Seattle last and found the law was a net loss for workers. The study concluded: “Our preferred estimates suggest that the Seattle Minimum Wage Ordinance caused hours worked by low-skilled workers (i.e., those earning under $19 per hour) to fall by 9.4% during the three quarters when the minimum wage was $13 per hour, resulting in a loss of 3.5 million hours worked per calendar quarter. Alternative estimates show the number of low-wage jobs declined by 6.8%, which represents a loss of more than 5,000 jobs.” Keep in mind this was before the full impact of the $15 per hour minimum wage could be felt, as the law only became fully implemented this year. The situation is going to get worse in Seattle.

Aren’t there some posters on here that are fans of his?

Most likely all of the above.

He has absolutely no idea.

Dems are such tortured souls.

[Hidden Content]

This will be just another day at Starbucks with their new policy in place.

Prayers and strength for the Griffith family.

Ditto

And 3...2...1... [Hidden Content]

You know it...very doubtful that the nfl was suddenly overcome with Patriotism.

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

From the article: Drugs - including marijuana, cocaine, opiates, and other 'psychoactive substances' - are banned from the event. Just wait.

D. All of the above

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] Typical liberal overreaction...I wonder if it will be ok for the homeless to set up tents?

[Hidden Content] A NAACP leader and a "Reverend". smh

This is the REAL swamp.

Please don’t encourage him, Grad...we’re doomsdayed out over there.

Prayers for this young man and family.

This one obviously leaves folks speechless.

Which proves Constitutional "Scholar's" opinions are often no more accurate that reasonably intelligent laymen. Doesn't make sense to me that an anti-commandeering argument can be made that is in direct contrast to the written Constitution, as I interpret it, anyway. Seems that would open the door for states to make the Constitution meaningless...which we are slowly getting to, anyway. I'm curious what are your thoughts on the framers intent on 4-4.

Article IV, Section 4 of the U.S. Constitution "The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Executive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence." Border security is one of the enumerated powers given to the fed gov...gambling regulation is not. Apple and oranges...to reasonable folks, anyway. A state such as California has no right to allow anyone in illegally (key word) and allow them sanctuary. Of course, Napolitano may have a point, no telling where liberal activist judges will take this.