LumRaiderFan

Exhibit K

They still are.

lol

Steps in it every time, doesn't he?

What you obviously missed, Englebert, is that this process is caused by man on Earth, but on Mars, it occurs naturally. UNLESS, as REB has pointed out, someone did smuggle a Briggs and Stratton to Mars.

Exhibit J

That's two fine looking young men.

Only if you don't want to have an "accident".

They would rather have them read "Rules for Radicals". Either way, we know they will read what they are told to read.

Us ain't going away, either.

Great minds...

lol...you put your victim glasses on every time you read something, don't you? If you want to debate, quit going to the unrealistic extreme on every point.

Whether I care or not makes no difference, all I know is the gov Is not the answer. The answer is getting the gov out of the way and letting those evil corporations compete. I would rather see results, not "good intentions ".

What's your proposal...you want to shut the refineries down? I can assure you that if we have refineries and chemical plants, there will be accidents...so what's your solution? All I've seen you do is whine, but I bet you drive a vehicle (or two or three) and use lots of products that contain petroleum.

From the article: Some, however, believe the Obama administration relied on consent decrees too often and sometimes took advantage of vulnerable cities unable to effectively defend themselves against a well-resourced DOJ. “I think a recalibration would be welcome,” said Richard Epstein, a professor at New York University School of Law and a fellow at the Hoover Institution at Stanford, adding that consent decrees should be used in cases where clear, systemic issues of discrimination exist.

How in the world did you get THAT out of what I said...lol.

It already does...corporate profit is no threat to quality of life. In fact, it improves it...more profit, more expansion, more jobs.

Disagree...Democrats still exist.

LOL LOL LOL!

Exactly right...but somehow, lowering their salary will make someone's life better...smh. Amazes me that this is what many folks zero in on.

And who exactly should decide how much these CEOs should make...let me guess. Should this also extend to CEOs of auto manufactures...everyone needs a car, right? No thanks, I don't want to go down that socialist road.

Weird how this doesn't get the attention in the mainstream media that the Palin crosshairs comments did...one might think the media is biased.

It's sad that so many people really believe this...that the gov is the only fix. Do you really think that the gov will actually make costs go down...I'll answer...NO! The will simply take more from one group and take less from another and problem solved...the takers are paying less. Problem is, that isn't sustainable...eventually the takers will over burden the makers.

[Hidden Content]

How did you come up with that one? And you have no idea why he fired Comey...but he did deserve to be fired, he was not fit for the job. The President can fire who he sees fit...he's not obligated to leave anyone, including Comey, in their position when they are obviously trying to take him down any way he can. There are many more he should fire IMO.