LumRaiderFan

Bingo

lol

Didn't think you agreed with it...have seen enough of your posts to know you probably don't, and I realize you are simply putting the legal position out. I would disagree that it was only in the modern age that murder was defined...the commandment in Hebrew is not actually "Thou shall not Kill", it's actually interpreted as "Thou shall not take an innocent life". In the womb is about as innocent as they get.

Nuts

And agreeing with the SC decision that killing babies is OK and legal will be a losing proposition. Some of us don't agree that 9 folks have the eternal say in what is right and what is wrong...their "opinion" will change, God's won't. The SC is the final say in the law of the land...I get it, but as a Christian I can also say that they are wrong. And if you don't want to get in a Theological discussion, don't throw out there that killing a baby in the womb is not murder just because 9 folks say it's not.

Depends on which Book you are referring to.

[Hidden Content] +1

[Hidden Content]

I just love hearing it too.

When he announced the site he said he would remain the "voice for those that still need to be heard". He ain't going away.

Anyone that hunts, shoots, owns a gun or simply cares about adhering to the Constitution needs to join the NRA. Google NRA-ILA if you want to see what they are battling daily with what I think are very inexpensive membership dues. OK...off my soapbox.

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] I may have to watch more lefty networks for a while...should be amusing.

The comments on this are hilarious...by the way, she's way beyond Play-Doh and puppies.

Most would give Bench the nod for sure if you were talking about catching and hitting (even though Pudge was a good hitter). If you were talking purely catching, many would give that to Pudge...I'm quite sure the opposing baserunners would.

Someone has to make healthcare affordable.

All it would take is a very simple google to see legislation that Obama has proposed (multiple years) for "safer" gun laws...I guess that's asking too much.

You guys on the left keep focusing on the reporting source rather than the actual events (as in the email scandal). It's working out great for you us.

You just can't fix stupid...I've heard that used out of context lately, but in this case, it's very accurate.

Buy Play-Doh stock...NOW!

[Hidden Content] From the article: You urged Alberta to embrace renewable energy. We agree. Developing renewables is one of the best ways to reduce our environmental footprint. Just FYI, though, the companies who run those mines you flew over? They're the ones actually building renewable energy. Suncor, the single largest synthetic crude oil producer in Alberta’s oil sands, operates five wind farms in Canada - with plans to build two more - generating a total of nearly 200 megawatts. Enbridge, a pipeline company and proponent for the Line 3 project, just invested $200 million in a 103 megawatt wind farm. The company is now invested in nearly 2,200 megawatts of renewable power generation, enough to supply electricity to about 700,000 Canadian homes. I presume none of this was brought to your attention during your Alberta visit. That's fine, though - we love getting the chance to talk about it.

[Hidden Content]

I can agree that he should ignore much of what is thrown at him, but it's funny you never called out Obama for his incredibly thin skin.

Hope someone takes him golfing to minimize the damage.

No, it's not...you can't personally interview eyewitnesses to verify all stories...come on. If you think a story is false...YOU prove it. As for teaching evolution, good for them...it's a THEORY. If you choose to believe it, fine, just don't push it on those that don't. As CraigS pointed out, it's in the same ballpark as "man-made" global warming. And as for "hit piece" ...so what. Some actions deserved to be targeted and "hit". Was it a hit piece when they reported what Trump and Billy Bush said...absolutely. Was it true...absolutely.