LumRaiderFan

[Hidden Content]

Yep

lol...pass.

Venezuela now enjoying the utopia created by chavez...a man many on the left held in high esteem for crushing capitalism in favor of socialism. [Hidden Content]

Her SC picks are what scare me the most...she could pick up to 4 and that would change the court for many many years.

I don't think they could have anticipated many of the citizens we have now either....don't know, don't care, or both.

Can't believe you guys want to hang this on the clintons...this is obviously just a lot of very strange, coincidental string of events. Move along, citizens...nothing to see here.

[Hidden Content]

lol...good grief. I will admit I sometimes felt I needed a financial counselor after Christmas when the kids were young.

No doubt many think it's endless, maybe they'll figure it out when it ends. It will probably be similar to the 10 guys drinking story you have posted...lol.

Uh Oh...if this keeps happening, Big Girl's friend will no longer have anyone to subsidize their $25.00 health insurance. The takers will someday realize they needed the makers.

I bet they won't land in Texas. Take a little time to defend your candidate on the comparing the tax plans thread...you know, something that will actually affect your life...not what Trump said 20 years ago.

I bet they won't land in Texas.

There it is...this does not make one a Trump supporter...it makes one a hillary opposer!

Still no answer...come on Hillary supporters, take a break from the "Trump gonna trump" thread and sell me on Hillary's tax plan...tell me how this will benefit you or me.

Just in, Bill Clinton endorsing Hillary.

Uh Oh, Dems are gonna need a new standard bearer...well, maybe not.

Curious if any tax paying Dems support Hillary's plan over Trump's plan, and if so, why?

What a shame...a mother with a four month old and an officer that was to retire in December.

lol...dude, quit hunting

[Hidden Content] From the article: Conclusion: The Trump tax plan as outlined in September 2016 is a large tax cut, mostly on individual and corporate income. This plan would significantly reduce the cost of capital and reduce the marginal tax rate on labor. These changes in the incentives to work and invest would increase the U.S. economy’s size in the long run, boost wages, and result in more full-time equivalent jobs. On a static basis, the plan would reduce federal revenue by between $4.4 trillion and $5.9 trillion, depending on policy assumptions about business tax rates. However, due to the larger economy and the significantly broader tax base, the plan would reduce revenue by between $2.6 trillion and $3.9 trillion over the next decade, depending on those same policy assumptions. In all cases, it would increase after-tax incomes for all income groups, but reduce revenue to the Treasury. [Hidden Content] From the article: Conclusion: Hillary Clinton would enact a number of tax policies that would raise tax revenue over the next decade in order to fund new or expanded programs. Most of her policies raise tax revenue as designed, except for her capital gains policy, which would actually end up losing revenue both on a static and a dynamic basis due to the incentives it creates to hold on to assets longer. If enacted, her tax policies would impose slightly higher marginal tax rates on capital and labor income, which would result in a reduction in the size of the U.S. economy in the long run. This would decrease the revenue that the new tax policies would ultimately collect. The plan would lead to lower after-tax incomes for taxpayers at all income levels, but especially for taxpayers at the top.

Another alec baldwin

Don't think I have ever met a Trump supporter.

Tell me why hillary is a better candidate...real answers. What policies of hers do you like enough to get your vote?

Amazing, but very predictable.