LumRaiderFan

Maybe it's time to form "sanctuary cities" that are free from police. Folks that think police are a major problem can choose to go live in these police-free societies and police them themselves. Problem solved for all. Oh, don't expect any support from surrounding non police-free areas when it doesn't work out.

[Hidden Content] smh

What stood out to me about the story is the total lack of respect these young folks had for a law enforcement officer...couldn't even imagine doing something like this at that age.

There is the way it is, and the way many want it to be.

[Hidden Content] Young and dumb...and now unemployed.

Oh my goodness...these are easy. Look at how many countries and Democrats all knew he had WMD (he did) ...even Clinton while he was POTUS said he had WMDs. [Hidden Content] Cheney was forced to sell his Halliburton holdings when he became VP. Years later, the Democrats starting using his profits from the sale of stock to berate Cheney by having insider knowledge to sell his stock when they were the ones pressing him to sell due to conflict of interest. [Hidden Content] From the article: He took the money and ran. Cheney made millions when he sold his Halliburton stock in the summer of 2000. The stock then was worth over $50 per share. It is now about $13. As the Los Angeles Times puts it: "Cheney seems to share one defining characteristic of ex-CEOs whose actions are now under intense scrutiny: He became a millionaire many times over by cashing in his stock options before problems came to light and ordinary shareholders began losing their shirts." But wait. Cheney did not sell his stock because he had inside knowledge that the stock market — and his company's shares — were headed south. He was forcedto sell his stock when he was chosen by George Bush to be his running mate. He wasn't dumping. He didn't want to sell. In fact, the big brouhaha at the time was Cheney's wanting to retainsome of his stock options. He sold purely to avoid conflicts of interest. Not from any foreknowledge. Certainly not from any guilty knowledge. Geez...Do some research.

It's a silly argument to say someone listens to this news outlet or that news outlet and believes every word they say...it means you got nothing else when you blame the source. Smart folks watch Fox and CNN, and dumb folks watch Fox and CNN...and both watch no news.

She more than likely won't be charged but does any rational person think she did nothing wrong...O.J. was innocent too. I notice they don't identify these so-called gov secrecy experts (only a lawyer that "handled" security clearance cases) ...I wonder if it's the same experts in charge of her secret server? This woman is guilty but many don't know or don't care...they will vote for her anyway if given the chance.

And don't leave out the Huffington Post.

Hmmm...wonder why the media will label him a racist (which he is) but not BLM? (which they are)

[Hidden Content]

It's amazing how many people give Hillary a pass on her actions...smh.

Right...why would anyone think they wanted any harm to come to cops. [Hidden Content] From the article: The lead founder of BLM is Alicia Garza, a young woman who candidly reveres Assata Shakur—the Marxist revolutionary, former Black Panther, and convicted cop-killer whose 1979 escape to Fidel Castro's Cuba was facilitated by the Weather Underground Organization and the Black Liberation Army. Others whom Garzapraises for their “extraordinary” accomplishments include Angela Davis (a Marxist and former Black Panther); Ella Baker (an avowed socialist who had ties to the Communist Party USA and the Weather Underground); and Audre Lorde (a black Marxist lesbian feminist).

First sign of violence from them I hope the cops drop the hammer on these guys...hard.

Not what 77 is saying at all...he's talking about denouncing these idiots. [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]

Agree 100%

Wright...Johnson was the mountain man.

What is the meaning of life?

Past history...I asked who should be elected in 2016 and why.

When you have someone that is receiving some form of entitlement from the gov, it's difficult to convince them why cutting their benefit is a good idea. I really don't get the "they care about me mentality" ... no, they don't...they just want your vote. I want someone that will run gov in an efficient manner, don't care if they care about me and mine.

Everyone loves free stuff...but we know it isn't really free and it can't be sustained forever. The problem is that more and more folks are receiving this "free" stuff in the form of entitlements and vote for those that promise and provide it (Democrats) in the general election. Why else would anyone vote for Sanders or Clinton...it's because they are promising folks something from gov. Guys like Cruz and Perry, on the other hand, make no such promises and in fact, want to shrink gov...many don't want to hear that message. Sad place to be when so many are looking to gov to meet their everyday needs.

lol...I guess the crowing is a coping mechanism for their situation.

How so...Habitat for Humanity? I think you would serve the American people better by getting gov out of the way and allowing businesses to create jobs so folks can buy their own house. Carter never figured that out...neither has Obama.

So who will the working, educated people vote for and why?