LumRaiderFan

Well, they didn't walk out on Phil at CPAC.   [Hidden Content]

  Yep...the question is not IF but WHEN if we continue this way.

From the article:   An aide to Bush told WND the governor is not worried and predicted he will win over the crowd, once they find out “how conservative he really is.”   If you have held office as long as he has and you have to explain how conservative you are, you aren't a conservative.

  Works for me...pay out to all those that are over a certain age and announce a cutoff date.   It's a wonderful thought but we all know it will never happen...but it should.   Bottom line is that it will eventually all go away if we continue down this road.

  You said the Republicans should have offered an alternative and I disagree, no alternative, no counter offer for obamacare was needed.   If the Democrats said we should provide everyone with a new Lexus, the right response is no one gets a new car, not that we should provide a Honda instead.   Some things are not the business of the fed gov...that is if you still want to go by the Constitution and not consider it a charter of negative liberties.

  Maybe because many believe there should't be an alternative...the fed gov has no business involving themselves in health care.   You and many others need to stop seeing the fed gov as the answer to all ills.

[Hidden Content]

  And the only possible answer is the fed gov, right?

  Famous hockey player.

EM, for someone that claims to be a manager of billions, I find it odd that you have so much confidence in the fed gov, who has proven repeatedly to be one of the most pathetic money managers ever.

Don't need luck...I have worked hard all my life to be secure when I retire.

If medicare and SS went away tomorrow I would be a happy camper. I would give up all the years I have paid in if I could stop paying right now. I can provide my own social security and my own medical care...no fed gov needed. I am sure that is a concept you won't understand.

So you want single payer...100% fed gov healthcare?

You do know medicare and SS are paid for by the recipients and the fed gov is simply giving them back THEIR money, right?

Once again...a fed gov fix.

That's what "they" said about healthcare.

You obviously know a lot more about this than me but I also know the last thing I would want is the fed gov involve themselves so they can "fix" the problems.

  How so?

But you do think the ISPs will screw us over if not reigned in by the fed gov...right?

  So your opinion is the fed gov MUST step in or the big bad ISPs are going to screw everyone over if they aren't kept in check.   You are saying the fed gov is the answer to this problem (not really a problem) right?

  An article was posted, you didn't like it but won't say why when questioned...usual deflection.   Why don't you explain to us what net neutrality is...google it if you need to...there are tons of articles on it.   I'm a low information voter???  Good one.

  And I simply asked if net neutrality was good or bad...and why.   And I got the typical "you hate obama" response.   So I'm still waiting too.

  Read back where I said anything about it one way or another...I didn't.   You jumped in to bash the article so why don't you explain why instead of your usual deflection.   Or Buddy Garrity, since you like the comment he made and must agree with it, you explain why this is a good thing for the internet since he won't.

Smitty posted an article that you two want to bash but rather than bash the article and why we conservatives don't understand it, try explaining the merits in net neutrality that you obviously see that we don't.

  Is this good or bad in your opinion, and why?