LumRaiderFan

  It's only an assumption that she/he is a transgender?

Wouldn't want them teaching either.

Good question...I wonder if you will get an answer from new tobie?

If Frank Marshall Davis, Jeremiah Wright or Bill Ayers didn't concern someone, they'll consider this no big deal.

Why should anyone have to remove their child so a transgender teacher can stay? If she/he is really in this for the kids, they should find an ISD that is accepting of them...I'm sure they're out there.

  My point is that against her continuing to teach are many LISD parents and for her are very few LISD parents and mostly special interest groups.   We'll know the final decision after this weekend and depending on that, LISD will find out how much fallout they will have to endure...and NOT from parents but from groups that have no ties to LISD kids but to one disgruntled transgender teacher.

  Easy Easy ... I meant to add a  :)

  I certainly hope a nudist doesn't apply for any sub work...another bandwagon for you.

  Check it out for yourself if you care to...found out that ALL the speakers and folks that represented against her at the open forum discussion had kids in the school district...only one speaker for her had a kid in the district and most of the speakers for her were from various LGBT groups in the area.   And there has been no decision made as to what the future will hold for her as a sub at LISD and I was also told that several of the news stories range from either distorted to flat out lies or the news is simply going by her assessment of what the situation is.   My earlier statements about LISD caving to avoid consequences were innaccurate and based on bogus news reports and even though it may still happen, has not yet.   Sad that this has to be more about this teacher and special interest groups than the kids.

  No, I wasn't at the meeting but talked to folks that were.   you call SE Texas backwoods so you are obviously not well traveled (lots more backwoods places than here) and SE Texas IS the normal way of doing things IN SE Texas.   You seem to think we need to adopt some sort of liberal progressive way of doing things just because it's normal in other places.   LISD caved because they were worried about consequences, not because the good people in Lumberton have embraced this...person.   I think it's you that are not "normal folks" around here YET...but be patient, I'm sure we'll get there at this rate.

And if this "person" were concerned about the well-being of the kids, he/she would move on and try to minimize what is going on.   But he/she and the squeaky LGBT community have an agenda and it has to be pushed no matter the damage.

  Comparing African American civil rights to rights for a cross dressing transgender...now that is radical.   But, hey...your side won on this one, and I have no doubt we'll see more and more perverted behavior accepted in the future.   When it gets to a line that even you don't want to see crossed, just remember you asked for it.

  Obviously you didn't get any feedback from the meeting...there was no tremendous support for Klug and there were more than a couple of parents concerned about this.   If this is what "times are changing" means for the public school system, the private school industry looks very bright.   "Massive" lawsuit and the wrath of a "great many people"...LOL...it's time we quit caving to groups like this that are pushing their agenda on normal folks.

I can guarantee the same people that are up in arms about the Rice appointment would welcome Obama or anyone from his regime with welcome arms to the board.   I guess spying is OK to the left when the left does it.   [Hidden Content]

  I agree with mat...you're not the one that is confused.   Cave in by the LISD because there may be consequences to doing what is best for the kids...smh.

  The fact that we have to say him/her is reason enough.   The school district is (should be) about the kids and what's best for them.

Most eventually figure out when they have been duped...some never do, and those that are benefiting don't care and continue to vote for the dupers.   He managed to lose Obama girl...wow.

She has no point...so if it's on the internet or TV, we should allow it in the schools...smh.

:) :(

  Why not is because of the "he or she" thing.

  Agree...probably nothing more than a couple of rogue House Oversight Committee members.

[Hidden Content]

  My main disagreement with this was never about it simply being a distraction...I was only commenting on your post.   I have a problem with willfully allowing perverted behavior around middle (or any age) school kids.

  Now that would put the Democrats back in the game.

It will never happen but if zero-liability voters couldn't vote it would destroy the Democrats.   That's why they will do everything they can to make sure plenty of folks STAY on welfare...sad.