LumRaiderFan

Ignore him guys...he adds nothing to the debate and will probably be booted again soon anyway.

So do I... but I'm sure you'll come around. :)

My point exactly, there is none...straight and homosexual are choices IMO.   People make choices about all kinds of stuff all the time that are baffling and make no sense to others...but I believe they are just that, choices.   I gotta feeling we'll have to agree to disagree on this one. 

I don't remember the day I decided not to become an ax murderer either, but I am not one. (I am not equating the two, so don't go there)   You believe it is how we are and I believe it's a choice we make...like any behavior. If behavior is simply "who we are", that would be a great legal defense for anything we do.   ...and if I'm not mistaken, there is no homosexual chromosome.

Not sure, but it was a choice I made influenced by the healthy heterosexual examples set before me. I see you acknowledge it's a choice and not genetic.

I take it that's your way of saying you don't believe hell is a real place/destination.

You calling it a dumb explanation is a badge of honor for me. I gave you my explanation, take it or leave it, I couldn't' care less either way. :) What you should be explaining is why you would put a kid in a lifestyle that, if he adopts as his own, will go to hell literally if he doesn't change.

You asked how homosexual marriage deprived a child of a mother and father...a father is a man and a mother is a woman in my way of thinking and a homosexual marriage has to leave one out.   That's my way of thinking...explained.

  Hmmmm...really?

Regardless, the state should make the call. The EPA is just one more nonsensical branch that should be abolished.

More fed gov overreach.   [Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content]   From the article...Obama's words:   For the average person, many folks who don’t have health insurance initially, they’re going to have to make some choices. And they might end up having to switch doctors, in part because they’re saving money.

But he knows all he has to do is make one comment about anything and the sippers gulpers run with it without question.

Hide what...all the millions he gives to church and charity.

  Already got the house in order...the Senate and White House are next.

She wants to actually report real news stories that are truthful???... how dare her.   Guess she'll have to go to Fox if she wants to do that.   [Hidden Content]

  He is probably too exhausted from the all-nighter they just pulled to save the planet from climate change.

[Hidden Content]

  Could not agree more...practice what you preach...if you don't you will get hammered.   What puts conservatives at a disadvantage sometimes, is that it is hard to hold someone accountable for something they place little importance on and their constituents are like-minded.   Sometimes I want the Republicans to take the gloves off and go after someone like Lois Lerner and dig up everything you can on them when they pull the kind of mess she did...play by their rules.   And I know they can play hardball too, but they generally don't take the stance of destroy someone at all costs, even if you have to make it up.

  The point would be showing you that the scandals and improprieties from liberals far outnumber the scandals and improprieties from conservatives...it only makes sense, because many liberals have no clearly defined moral values (and proudly claim it) so you would expect more scandals from them...even though they consider them no big deal many times.   I wouldn't accept Stevenash's challenge either because you probably would not like the results.

  A Republican dirtbag and a Democrat dirtbag are equal...or should be, anyway.   Problem is the two partys have different dirtbag scales.

[Hidden Content]   From the article:    One of the proposed changes would have restricted the number of prescription drug plans an insurer could offer, which would decrease the choices available to seniors.   The administration argued that less choice would help seniors, because having too many options could be "confusing".   Yeah, that's what I hate when I'm shopping for something...too many choices...don't want to be confused so I would be very grateful for someone eliminating most of my choices for me.   :wacko:   Of course, they got rid of this during an election year...and I'm sure it will never be back.

Anyone who is a member of the NRA has been getting plenty of info on this guy...Obama pushes the limit on every administration choice he makes. But you would expect a radical to choose radicals.

I would like to see Rand Paul because I am more in line with his views than anyone else. He is a small gov fiscal conservative with much more sensible views on foreign policy than his Dad. That being said, I don't know if he will be electable in 2016....more of an evaluation of the voters rather than Paul. All the most viable candidates for the GOP in 2016 are more of the same big gov spenders that will continue to go along with increasing the federal debt...hopefully that will change. But, they will at least be on the right side of Second Amendment and military issues...IF they can beat Hillary.

  Alleged...that's the key word...never proven.   And one of his accusers admitted she lived in the same building as David Axelrod...quite a coincidence.   [Hidden Content]   And I sure am glad you are not saying it's OK for a sitting President to seduce a young intern with his power...many on the left had no problem with it.