LumRaiderFan

Happy Easter

Good points, my main point is that there will always be lines but they should never be federally subsidized lines...too large to manage. States, counties, cities, churches,local food banks are all better and more easily managed options.

The BLM is another overreaching fed gov branch that should be abolished.

No, I don't' understand your view that the providers are the problem instead of the receivers.

I have a solution...actually it comes from the Constitution...anybody standing in any line is a state, not federal problem. You still haven't explained how the folks in line aren't the actual problem.

The problem is with those in line...they are a financial burden. Those that you say are the problem are the ones paying for those in line but you seem to think that they are the problem because they dare complain about supporting the noble folks in line with THEIR hard earned money.

There's a good reason Fox is #1. The liberal outlets spend more time talking about Fox than simply reporting the news.

Right...the local news has done a very poor job on this story.

holder just wants to make sure everything is above board and transparent.

[Hidden Content]     From the article:   The top 10 percent of all income earners paid 71 percent of federal income taxes in 2010, yet they earned 45 percent of all federal income.   Compare that to the bottom 50 percent of earners, who earn 12 percent of income yet pay only 2 percent of federal income taxes.

And unless we change course the 86 million will shrink and the 148 million will expand.

Our tax system is not progressive?   :rolleyes:  smh...always the victim.

  Simply being a Republican would carry no weight towards suppressing aggressive behavior...it would have to be backed up by actions.   I do think that Muammar Gaddafi, who was the bad boy of the 80s, shut his piehole and changed course after Reagan hit him in 1986.  If that would not have happened, I believe he would have continued down the path he was on.   So yes, I believe projecting a strong presence, and the bad guys knowing you are serious, works.

Stevenash, only the noble and downtrodden deserve a tax rate of zero... the actual taxpayers deserve the progressive and punitive tax rate they have coming.

It sure did!

[Hidden Content]   Why does the fed gov feel the need to so often mess up things that have worked perfectly fine for years and years?

  In true cowardly Bill Clinton fashion...ignore the real bully and pick on the weaker kid.

LOL

  I agree, I get a feeling you are very dedicated to the kids and their learning...but please don't ever dress like a woman in front of them!   :D   BTW, I know several teachers that teach younger kids and every one of them spends a good deal of their money on supplies for their kids.   The kids could probably make do without but they choose not for them to.

  God's Word makes it clear that many situations that the world deems as acceptable are not to Him.   As far as having a direct connection to God, yes, I do, it's called prayer and reading His Word...available to anyone that accepts Him as Lord and Savior.

:rolleyes:

So when Mr/Ms Klug was born, God made a mistake and she figured it out and is making it right...don't think so.   Come on...your argument makes no sense.

  How do you know that is the truth...if they had not been managing the land, they wouldn't have lasted 100 years.   You buy the tree hugger  statements at face value when the evidence points otherwise.   This land has obviously been managed...the fed gov is ticked off because he isn't paying their grazing rights.

  Yes I do, but properly managed, can actually improve habitat...many ranchers are employing the "one herd" grazing practice that improves habitat and native grass species.   Another problem I have with this  is why is the fed gov managing what should be state land? (i know this won't change...just one more place they shouldn't be)

  I believe they limit the number of speakers at open forum meetings so don't think that would apply.   This is a person that can't seem to figure out what they are...I would call that unstable, and in turn, would not be comfortable with putting them in charge of children.   You may be willing to take that chance (obviously so) but I'm not...kids come first in a school district.