LumRaiderFan

  NO NO NO... you're making his point!    :D  :D

  We only spy on our own citizens, not other countries...that would be rude.

  I disagree...I think he's listening very closely...that's what is alarming!   Now I do think that he is ignoring demands that come out of the White House.

There is a reason it's affordable (it's really not without subsidies)   I wonder if members of Congress will be excluded from these top hospitals...I'm guessing no.   [Hidden Content]   From the article:   In a broader way, tensions exist with networks because insurers have long seen restricting the list of providers as a way to cut costs. But such moves in the past prompted backlashes and a spate of horror stories. Since then, few insurers have felt empowered to kick out more expensive major providers, said David Dranove, a Northwestern University professor who specializes in health-industry management issues. But now, given that the Affordable Care Act relies on competition and market forces — and prevents insurers from excluding the sick — insurers have returned to networks as a way to keep premiums down.

Obama has been focused on the economy, that's the problem.   "Focus" only works when sensible policies are put in place.

Do some research to see who agreed with the "lie" (it's been posted on here several times) ... lots of Democrats and intelligence agencies from other countries.   The old story that Bush made this up and snookered everyone else is old and not true.

About time to get a Republican in the White House so we are taken seriously again! Liberals even realize that liberals make a mess of things when in charge!

Me too!

Correction, the Frank/Dodd recession...

I'll report, you decide! :)

Fair enough...I'll just have to hope my posts are on the" approved" source list from now on! :)

Yep...you're a funny guy!

Yep, that's how it works. When a story is posted either prove it wrong or at least give another viewpoint... it's' called debate. To just dismiss it whether it's right or wrong because you don't like the source is a copout. You leftys really do need falconfanatic.

Now that is funny!

Yep...that's my only response because if we were to start cherry-picking articles like this that showed whether Bush or Obama was treated fairly, you would lose that BIG TIME, and it would be a useless practice!   And the fact that you think Fox and MSNBC are equal in their critic and the other major news outlets (CNN, ABC, CBS, NBC) offer somewhat neutral coverage is laughable.

  I'm sure Cheney would have appreciated that sentiment when he was having heart problems.   :)

Don't know...I have no doubt a few exceptions for anything can be found but for the most part, do you think Bush and Obama receive/have received equal coverage/scrutiny by the mainstream media outlets?

  Couldn't disagree more...for example, the coverage that this President and Bush received are light years apart...if the left media couldn't tweak it their way they would not report on it or, in some cases, lie!   Take the latest example, you think if John Ashcroft would have "suggested" that state AGs ignore their own laws that the Bush administration disagreed with, the media would not have blown up on it...you know they would have.   Why don't you start disproving these articles you simply blow off (if you can) and that may carry a little weight to your argument.   You guys could sure use another falconfanatic!

Is you are dismissing non-credible news sources, I guess you better put CBS and NBC on the list as well.   [Hidden Content]   [Hidden Content]   My point is take the time to check out a story when it is posted rather than blast the source...even the National Enquirer gets it right sometimes.

OK, we're done high fiving (goofy statement) and the link is to Fox news...can you finally give an opinion on Holder's actions?   My point is not about homosexual marriage, I am talking about Holder suggesting state AGs be dismissive of their own laws.   [Hidden Content]

Show me dozens of bogus posts I have made from bogus sources...and no matter what the source, they are very easy to validate or refute nowadays with a little effort.

Anytime any change is made to voting protocol in any state, the real reason is to always suppress the poor impoverished democrat voter... Everybody knows that! BTW...did you want me to attack the source?

We all know this has happened so let me ask you... Does it concern you that Holder would suggest states ignore their own laws? It was odd to me that you didn't comment on that but on the source NOTB used. I have heard this being referred to as promoting sedition, and I am inclined to agree.

That's your comment on the article? He is asking states to ignore their own laws and you have no problem with it? I was waiting to see what comments would be made on this move and am amazed by the lack of concern.

Bad things happen when you put incompetent, unqualified people in important positions...this administration proves this top to bottom.