LumRaiderFan

They were too dignified to vote for Trump, so they voted for this. 😂

[Hidden Content] From the article: Dozens of House Democrats put forward legislation last week that claims the sea level will rise as much as 30 feet by the year 2100 if the government does not act to counter climate change. 🤦‍♂️

[Hidden Content] From the article: Austin, Texas, leaders are cutting ties with state police who were supplementing the understaffed local department despite crime reduction – in a move critics said cowered to liberal activists. Austin Mayor Kirk Watson, a Democrat, announced on Wednesday that the city is suspending a partnership with the Texas Department of Safety, when officers responded to emergency calls to assist the defunded and understaffed Austin Police Department. Watson had praised the partnership two days earlier and explained that crime and response times had gone down as a result – but in announcing the split, he said the partnership does not adhere to "Austin’s values." Austin's values, smh. Violent crime was down 28% because of this partnership but apparently that gets pushed aside for Austin's values.

democrats don’t like for folks to know what they’re doing.

And we got millions of them among us.

TDS also cost untold lives because hydroxychloroquine and ivermectin were dismissed as ineffective against covid simply because Trump touted them. Pre-Elon twitter, YouTube, Facebook and other social media was suppressing this information that would have saved lots of lives based on lies from Fauchi and Bill Gates because big pharma can make billions off the emergency act vaccine if there is determined there are no effective options. Trump was 100% right on this and there is tons of evidence that proves it.

democrats do love their mandates.

24/7

The democrats are the official party of war-mongers and free speech suppression.

24/7

🤦‍♂️

In Obama’s own words, “The Constitution is a charter of negative liberties”. And that’s why they hate it.

[Hidden Content] From the article: Firearm owners should avoid travel to Massachusetts and consider moving if they already live there, according to a gun rights organization concerned about a gun control bill making its way through the state legislature. "If Massachusetts makes House Docket 4420 law, Massachusetts will become the most anti-gun state in the country," Austin Hein, the director of political operations for the National Association for Gun Rights, told Fox News. "What Massachusetts is clearly trying to do here is basically repeal the Second Amendment as we know it," he added. The 140-page omnibus bill, An Act of Modernizing Firearm Laws, makes sweeping changes to Massachusetts gun laws. This includes mandating that all firearms and feeding devices be registered, banning people under 21 from buying or carrying a semi-automatic shotgun or rifle, banning concealed carry of firearms on private property unless expressly permitted and much more. "This is real bad news for any gun owner that lives in Massachusetts," Hein said. "Basically, pack your bags and leave because it's untenable if this thing passes." The National Association for Gun Rights issued a travel advisory for anyone who lives in Massachusetts or is traveling to Massachusetts because of the bill last week. The bill also cracks down on firearm-adjacent areas including banning targets with human silhouettes at ranges, banning people under the age of 18 from possessing mace or pepper spray and adding stun guns under the definition of firearms. "So what this bill will actually do is prohibit a young high school girl from being able to defend herself with even mace," Hein said. "I think the states are trying to ban stun guns because I honestly think they just want to leave you defenseless," he added. Hein also slammed the requirement for gun owners to register their firearms and magazines. "Registration leads to confiscation," Hein said. "If you are putting yourself on a government list of what firearms you own and how many you own best be sure that the government is going to be knocking on your door one day." Hein added that he thinks a provision in the bill would create a stop and frisk-like policy to become law. "The bill also goes so far as to allow law enforcement to demand that you show your permit without cause," Hein said. "That's basically a stop and frisk policy, which is another anti-gun policy."

[Hidden Content]

[Hidden Content] From the article: The Secret Service announced Thursday that it has closed its investigation into the cocaine found at the White House earlier this month and said it is "not able" to "single out a person of interest" because of a lack of physical evidence. What an embarrassment this administration is.

Agree 100%, apparently the folks in Washington think it's ok.

And it's ok to use your staff to promote the book?

Didn't read the article, did you? You would be all over this if it was Thomas. So I guess it's ok to have her staff, that we pay, to actively promote her book. On Tuesday, the Associated Press reported that her staff has often "prodded" public institutions that have hosted the justice to buy her memoir or children's books — works that have made her at least $3.7 million since joining the Supreme Court and continue to rake in six-figure royalty payments annually.

[Hidden Content] I'm sure out friends on the left that are concerned about SCOTUS behavior were going to post this. From the article: Sonia Sotomayor's net worth has increased significantly since joining the nation's highest court, according to financial disclosure forms amid new revelations about the Supreme Court justice's efforts to promote her books. Sotomayor was nominated by then-President Barack Obama to join the Supreme Court in 2009. At the time, her wealth was a small fraction of what it is now. In 2007, the sum of Sotomayor's total investments was between $50,001 and $115,000, according to her financial disclosure form for that year. She reported only two assets: a checking account and a savings account, both at Citibank. In 2008, Sotomayor's financial disclosures show she had the same two assets, this time totaling $15,001 to $65,000. The following year, during which Sotomayor was both nominated and confirmed to the Supreme Court, she held the same investments for the same range of value. Supreme Court Justice Sonia Sotomayor promotes her new book "My Beloved World" at Barnes & Noble Union Square on Jan. 20, 2013 in New York City. (Rob Kim/Getty Images) Since then, Sotomayor's net worth has skyrocketed, putting her among the ranks of the nation's millionaires. In 2021, her investments totaled somewhere between $1.5 million and $6.4 million, according to financial disclosure forms. Last year, investments were roughly the same, in between $1.6 million and $6.6 million. Sotomayor's yearly salary was about $180,000 as a federal appeals court judge before Obama nominated her, supplemented by about $25,000 a year from teaching at New York-area law schools. That salary went up several thousands of dollars upon becoming a Supreme Court justice. Currently, members of the high court make $285,400 except for the chief justice, who earns just under $300,000. One reason for the sharp increase in Sotomayor's investments and overall wealth is the money she's made from writing books. On Tuesday, the Associated Press reported that her staff has often "prodded" public institutions that have hosted the justice to buy her memoir or children's books — works that have made her at least $3.7 million since joining the Supreme Court and continue to rake in six-figure royalty payments annually.

Good point, Robert Byrd can somehow be excused by Big girl for being a card carrying high level KKK member that was likely involved in lunchings but anything Trump has done is an unforgivable sin. Comical

[Hidden Content] 🤦‍♂️ From the article: The column claimed that researchers have discovered "fascist fitness" groups online that are "radicalizing young men with neo-Nazi and White supremacist extremist ideologies." Recruitment methods allegedly include giving men "health tips and strategies for positive physical changes" where they later are exposed to "far-right content." "It appears the far right has taken advantage of pandemic at-home fitness trends to expand its decade-plus radicalization of physical mixed martial arts (MMA) and combat sports spaces," the MSNBC column argued. The column also name-dropped Adolf Hitler in order to discredit the interest in fitness and nutrition on the "far-right."

Very amusing post, myself and many others have gone over the accomplishments of the Trump administration with detail of the very policies that created them as well as the absolute failures of the biden administration and the policies that caused them, so I won't waste my time posting them again. What you can do is point me to the specific policies that biden has put in place that created all the fantasy scenarios that you describe. I'll save you some time, you can't. I truly hope that when Trump is out of the picture, you can move on in life, but I'm sure you'll then focus on another boogey man that is responsible for all your problems.

No, he didn't, it was simply a political move that he knew would fool democrat voters. This is the man, Robert Byrd: Byrd started his political life as an Exalted Cyclops in the Ku Klux Klan. In 1944, Byrd wrote the following in a letter to Senator Theodore Bilbo: "I shall never fight in the armed forces with a Negro by my side ... Rather I should die a thousand times and see Old Glory trampled in the dirt never to rise again, than to see this beloved land of ours become degraded by race mongrels, a throwback to the blackest specimen from the wilds." Byrd filibustered the 1964 Civil Rights Act for 14 hours. There are folks in life worth defending, this racist isn't one of them.

Bumbled through four tears. 🤣 Are you listening to Jack White right now?

Kamala Harris may have handled that better. 😬