LumRaiderFan

[Hidden Content] lol...how about that unbiased media coverage. It's a real shame that so many folks are ok with this simply because they don't like the guy, and turn a blind eye to biden and act surprised when he shows up at the debate in that shape. Anyone paying attention wasn't surprised. From the article: A viral video montage has emerged of prominent figures in the liberal media calling on government officials to invoke the 25th Amendment on former President Trump while he was in office. The montage, created by NewsBusters video editor Bill D’Agostino, noted that media members pushed the 25th Amendment narrative over 600 times during Trump’s White House tenure. The compilation of major media voices was part of a larger report published by the Media Research Center, which noted that MSNBC’s Lawrence O’Donnell brought up the idea of declaring Trump unfit for presidential duties less than a month after his inauguration. In December 2017, "Morning Joe" host Joe Scarborough said a close associate of Trump on the campaign trail told him the then-presidential candidate had "pre-dementia." Scarborough also suggested that "everybody" who’s known Trump for years has said he has "mentally devolved." The MSNBC co-host then said he wanted to know "when it’s safe" to start talking about whether Trump should be taken off his presidential duties. Scarborough’s comments came a month after he urged Trump’s cabinet and Republicans to use the 25th Amendment. "What is the cabinet waiting for?" he asked at the time. His co-host and wife, Mika Brzezinski, pushed for the use of the 25th Amendment on multiple occasions, calling Trump "not fit to lead" and "not well." Then-CNN legal analyst Jeffrey Toobin discussed the issue the following September when he said that the "mere fact" the 25th Amendment was allegedly discussed by people close to Trump suggested a degree of "unease or even panic" about the way the then-president conducted himself.

It will be on you for not voting, whether you like to hear that or not.

So you agree that a mandate to force an untested vaccine on anyone is ok? Leave Trump out of this, I know that's difficult for you, but he didn't call for any mandates, your boy did? Now answer the question, should anyone have lost their job for refusing to take the vaccine? And if you don't think there have been any adverse health effects, you haven't been paying attention.

I know you got your fingers crossed.

Another one they got wrong.

The only way we could become a bigger laughing stock to the world than we already are.

[Hidden Content] Hunter is now advising the President, there may still be hope for re-election.

Probably, democrats have always been ok with using violence to address their problems. Even have senators and congressmen touting it.

I actually did read the article, so if what you said about Trump "claiming" to overturn the election and it was an official act and turns out to not be an official act... then that's it...they got him...finally. lol, just when your TDS was waning.

So that's what he said? He actually said that trying to overturn the election was official? I would like you to find me the quote of him saying that. Good grief, at least put out actual facts.

Just remember, the democrats brought this on by weaponizing the DOJ and FBI to "silence" the opposition, that everyone said was so defeatable, I will add. And the rules don't apply to the democrats anyway.

More proof that choices matter.

[Hidden Content] From the article: A Tennessee woman who was fired from BlueCross BlueShield of Tennessee (BCBST) for refusing to comply with its COVID-19 vaccine requirement for employees has received a settlement worth nearly $700,000. A federal jury found that Tanja Benton "proved by a preponderance of the evidence" that her decision to refuse the vaccine was based on a "sincerely held religious belief," according to the settlement obtained by WTVC. For a total of over $687,000, the jury awarded Benton more than $177,000 in back pay, $10,000 in compensatory damages and $500,000 in punitive damages. Sad that she had to even prove what her reasoning was.

Pretty much every decision should be 9-0 if we had a group of unbiased SCJs that simply interpreted the Constitution in it's purest form. Happens both ways, much more from the left imo, but without a doubt there is legislation from the bench even in the highest court in the land.

And you certainly wouldn’t want your daughters buying son-cones there.

Democrats and the media never want to deal with this one.

We’ll see, until then, you continue making various three paragraph posts about how bad Trump will lose. It’s very entertaining.

Agree, and the player to be named later will most certainly be as bad for the country as Biden.

In November there are two choices, plain and simple.

Yes it would, a continuation of what we have now.

@UT alum how’s that list going?

Apparently he has had a cold his entire term. Give it up, your man is done, everyone but you realizes it.

🤦‍♂️

They did a good job of giving more time to answer the original question when he would backtrack. There is no way Biden can continue, but the democrat power players have been aware of this. Personally, it was tough to watch.

I agree