LumRaiderFan

I’m not arguing that it’s the law, but that this happens to me is ridiculous. Maybe put more effort into going after the REAL bad guys. At some point you would think someone would snap that this was simply a mistake where nobody got hurt. Laws, to me, are designed to catch bad guys. When it’s realized that a good guy got caught up in it by accident, seems like that could be considered.

A donthecon kindergarten post, nice work.

Doubtful, lol.

I wouldn’t

I would gift it to my brother and then collect that money he owed me, lol.

But not until 25 years has passed.

I would say yes, the transfer to the brother would basically be a private sale.

What a dirtbag, he should have run as a democrat, this is all acceptable behavior.

Won’t stop until all the democrats and their ignorant supporters are gone, which is never.

Why wait 25 years, why not scream at the time, why not immediately file charges, why wait until this will effect an election? None of this occurs to you? Sorry, she’s lying, and you hate Trump so much you got duped.

True story!

It is true, she waited until 2019 to bring it up. This was no meek woman, she was a well known feminist that wrote for Elle magazine. No way she would have stayed silent and no way she would have not pressed charges. She wasn’t even clear about the year. Like Trump or hate Trump, this was nothing but a political hit piece. By the way, she claims to have been sexually assaulted on another occasion in an elevator in the late 90s by a network executive but didn’t bother bringing it up until 2019 also.

So you agree with me finally, our problem is not a candidate, it's the dumb masses and you are pointing that out. Stop giving the voters in this nation the credit to be able to choose a candidate that's good for the country, they can't and won't. Our problem is not a candidate, thank you for FINALLY coming to your senses and pointing that out. Must be too early for the Bud Light, you're thinking clearly.

I was being a little sarcastic on my last statement that this HAS to be the thing that takes Trump down, just like Russia collusion, tax fraud or any other made up crap the left can could up with. DeSantis has made some disappointing moves, especially suspending an elected official that he didn't think would align with his policies on abortion.

Reads to me like it turned yellow and they "think" they can make it before entering the intersection.

Didn't she say he raped her? Did the jury not believe that part? Also, strange that she waited 25 years to bring charges right when he was running for President. I won't defend him but anyone that thinks this is nothing more than a political hit and chooses to ignore the fact that this surfaced at this time for no reason probably still thinks Kavanaugh is guilty. The good news is this is SURELY going to move Trump out of the way so DeSantis can be the next President, right?

Seems to me it would be.

[Hidden Content] Hopefully, she'll do a better job as AI czar than she did as border czar...but I doubt it. What an embarrassment to this great country.

[Hidden Content] From the article: The data is in and it’s becoming increasingly clear that the impacts of commercial marijuana industry are even worse than we thought, particularly for America’s young people. A new report released by Smart Approaches to Marijuana shows the reality in "pot-legal states" paints a vastly different picture than the common sales pitch of the industry and supporters of legalization. The marijuana industry, which spent billions to lobby elected officials and bankroll legalization referendum campaigns, is following the playbook pioneered by Big Tobacco. They recognize that the road to big profits runs through the heaviest users. As such, they have increased potency of the drug by more than four times since 1998, hoping to hook kids while they are young and vulnerable. The numbers show that it’s working. Usage rates have reached record highs among those who are most vulnerable to marijuana’s long-term health effects. The National Institute on Drug Abuse warned, "Past-year, past-month, and daily marijuana use (use on 20 or more occasions in the past 30 days) reached the highest levels ever recorded" among those aged 19 to 30. The percentage of 8th, 10th and 12th graders who used marijuana daily has more than tripled between 1991 and 2020. Daily marijuana use is indicative of a marijuana use disorder, also known as addiction to marijuana. For all the talk about how pot is not addictive, in 2021, 1.3 million individuals between the ages of 12 and 17 had a marijuana use disorder, accounting for more than 46% of users in that age group. Legalization is also associated with a 25% increase in marijuana use disorder among them as well. As usage rates, potency and addiction have increased, the adverse effects have also increased. Though supporters of legalization like to downplay the risks of marijuana, the drug caused more than 70,000 individuals younger than 18 to have marijuana-related emergency department visits in 2021. The industry told parents and politicians that they would not target kids. That’s turned out to be false. From "Pot Tarts" to "Stoney Patch Kids," the packaging of edibles laced with high-potency THC often looks like traditional snacks. Not surprisingly, between 2017 and 2021, there was a 1,375% increase in at-home exposures to marijuana edibles involving children younger than 6. More minors are driving under the influence of marijuana too. In 2021, 10.67 million people admitted to driving under the influence of marijuana, including 1.36 million who were between the ages of 16 and 20. There were 2.41 times more minors on the road under the influence of marijuana than were under the influence of alcohol.

🤦‍♂️ Please stop talking!

Agree

That's the dangerous trend, thankfully, we have groups like the NRA-ILA that have been fighting for our Second Amendment rights to stay intact....so far.

I just don't think it will stop a shooter. If I'm pissed at the world and decide to shoot up a school, I'll get a gun. The bill says it would restrict sales of "certain types of semi-automatic" rifles. This is nothing more than the democrat playbook of getting a toe-hold with a seemingly benign restriction and slowing adding more "certain types of rifles" in the future. And I certainly wouldn't want to deny a responsible 20 year old with a job living in not the best part of town because it's all he/she can afford from being able to buy any weapon of his choice for self-defense.

I don't think it will change anything, not the worst idea, but just don't think it will help. [Hidden Content] From the article: Since 1999, the median age of school shooters on K-12 campuses is 16, per the outlet.

democrats certainly don't like having to answer questions about their activities. Pathetic