STiger85
Members-
Posts
5,430 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by STiger85
-
SILSBEE VS. HUFFMAN BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 54-21!!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Just a few quick stats: 1 2 3 4 T Silsbee 13 14 14 13 54 Huffman 0 0 14 7 21 Silsbee Huffman Passing P. Reed 10-22-188-0-1 P. Townley 16-38-267-4-2 K. Scott 2-2-1 Rushing P. Reed 19-149 2TD P. Townley 7-(56) Y. Brydson 9-42 TD M. Longoria 4-26 F. Spearman 8-21 3TD D. Gray 4-13 TD K. Scott 7-28 R. Marches 2-20 Z. Jackson 2-(5) 45-235 5.22 ypc 17-3 0.18 ypc Recieving J. Holmes 3-69 D. Gray 8-131 TD Z. Jackson 3-3 C. Harrell 7-128 TD C. Elam 2-83 TD M. Longeria 1-8 F. Spearman 1-15 K. Scott 1-14 K. Ellers 1-8 L. Barnes 1-(3) 25 First Downs 17 13 Rushing 1 7 Passing 12 5 Penalty 4 8-13 3rd Down 1-10 0-1 4th Down 1-2 3-41 Avg. Punts 5-37 Avg. PAT 4-7 1 Point 3-3 1-1 2 Point 0-0 1 Turnovers 5 0 Fumbles 0 0 INT 4 1 TOD 1 12-82 Penalties 7-90 32:06 TOP 15:54 M. Garcia 3 INT K. Elers J. Holmes 50 punt return for a TD -
WEST ORANGE-STARK AT SILSBEE BROADCAST/WO-S wins 26-12
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Just a few quick stats: 1 2 3 4 T Silsbee 0 12 0 0 12 WO-S 0 13 6 7 26 Silsbee WO-S Passing P. Reed 8-21-112-1-1 J. Salter 8-10-55-1-0 T. Powell 1-1-19 Rushing P. Reed 15-68 A. Semien 20-118 2TD F. Spearman 11-16 TD J. Salter 13-67 K. Scott 2-10 T. Anderson 5-41 Y. Brydson 2-10 Q. Tezeno 3-16 Z. Jackson 1-(2) C. Rutledge 3-12 2TD C. Elam 1-(5) 32-97 3.03 YPC 44-254 5.77 YPC Recieving J. Holmes 3-47 J. Rhodes 3-15 M. Garcia 3-11 T. Anderson 1-14 L. Barnes 2-30 A. Semien 1-14 C. Elam 1-43 TD C. Rutledge 1-10 Q. Tezeno 1-4 D. Spencer 1-(2) 11 First Down 16 4 Rushing 12 6 Passing 4 2 Penalty 0 6-32.5 Punt 4-34 PAT 0-1 1 Point 2-3 0-1 2 Point 0-1 2 Turn Over 2 0 Fumble 1 1 INT 1 1 TOD 0 6-35 Penalty 6-74 24:04 TOP 23:56 C. Elam INT Q. Tezeno -
[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1324712" timestamp="1352493401"] [quote author=ST413 link=topic=105983.msg1324703#msg1324703 date=1352492938] I agree completely and was not trying to stir the put with this thread. I have heard and tonight will see how good the defense is. I an just inquiring how WOS fans feel about their offense. The outcome really has little meaning overall. Yes its a district title but [b]is that really the goal[/b].... [/quote] Well, since I come from an era where only the district champ made the playoffs, I consider it very important to a football program. Winning a championship is a good thing, something to be proud of and strive towards. Is it the end all be all? No. But it's nothing to just completely discard. Winning a state championship is the ultimate goal, but a district title should be a goal as well. [/quote] Well said!!!
-
[quote name="football2010" post="1324695" timestamp="1352492407"] Man some of you at WOS are hilarious like a bunch of little kids. Man when y'all get your behinds tore up in the playoffs I don't know how some of you are going to make it! Oh well you always have basketball or wait do you? I'm sure y'all are the best of the best of the best in that too. Or are you? Oh and PS remember you aren't in high school playing anymore. [/quote] Code book, gotta have a code book!!!!!
-
SETX HIGH SCHOOL WEEKLY SCHEDULE - WEEK 10
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="WOSgrad" post="1321365" timestamp="1352177767"] [quote author=STiger85 link=topic=105769.msg1321349#msg1321349 date=1352175400] I don't think you need to call anybody an idiot. I can assure you I am NOT an idiot! I can disagree with what is typed on here, that's what this website was created for: discussion within the rules. One would think that two teams battling for a district crown with only one loss between them and one team with a state ranking would have an edge. Mike and I talk and we don't always agree but we don't call each other names either. [/quote] The game you discuss is meaningless other than for pride purposes. Both sides know that they are going to the playoffs and what division of the playoffs that they are going in. The game that was chosen (and you may not agree with your broadcast partner, but on this one I certainly do) has the drama that the game you favor lacks. Oh and if you think I am going to retract my earlier assessment, I wouldn't hold my breath. [/quote] Yes, I have read on here many times that a district championship is just like you said meaningless, as long as you make the playoffs. I guess that is the mind set since three and four teams get to go to the playoffs. I guess playing for a district championship lacks drama? Oh and I guess a quy like you wouldn't retract your earlier assessment so God bless. -
SETX HIGH SCHOOL WEEKLY SCHEDULE - WEEK 10
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
I don't think you need to call anybody an idiot. I can assure you I am NOT an idiot! I can disagree with what is typed on here, that's what this website was created for: discussion within the rules. One would think that two teams battling for a district crown with only one loss between them and one team with a state ranking would have an edge. Mike and I talk and we don't always agree but we don't call each other names either. -
SETX HIGH SCHOOL WEEKLY SCHEDULE - WEEK 10
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Are you kidding me!!! The big school game of the week is two teams with losing records and just trying to get into the playoffs. SMH!!! -
SILSBEE AT HARDIN-JEFFERSON BROADCAST/Silsbee wins 28-7!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Just a few quick stats: 1 2 3 4 T Silsbee 7 7 14 0 28 H-J 0 7 0 0 7 Silsbee H-J Passing R. Reed 11-20-193-2-1 J. Gieseke 7-13-104-1-2 Rushing F. Spearman 13-117 2TD D. Cooper 13-31 P. Reed 12-128 J. Gieseke 11-0 K. Scott 3-9 B. Padgett 9-15 Y. Brydson 2-(5) E. Cooper 1-(1) D. VanNoy 1-(2) C. Morrison 1-(6) 30-249 8.3 ypr 36-39 1.08 ypr Receiving J. Holmes 6-114 D. VanNoy 4-30 Z. Jackson 2-24 TD B. Padgett 2-55 TD M. Garcia 2-19 S. Conner 1-21 C. Elam 1-36 TD 21 First Downs 10 12 Rushing 5 7 Passing 3 2 Penalty 2 4-7 3rd Down 1-12 0-1 4th Down 1-2 1-34 Avg Punt 7-36.3 Avg PAT 4-4 1 Point 1-1 0-0 2 Point 0-0 5 Turn Over 4 3 Fumble 1 1 INT 2 1 TOD 1 10-120 Penalties 8-84 18:13 TOP 29:47 INT T. Powell AJ Broussard J. Holmes -
HAMSHIRE-FANNETT AT SILSBEE BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 49-18!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="jenks" post="1311725" timestamp="1351315291"] [quote author=BuckBuck link=topic=105273.msg1311636#msg1311636 date=1351312025] I don't see in the play by play where the "inadvertent whistle" kept the Horns from completing a touchdown run in the open field. Or where the Horns actually covered a fumble in the end zone, but had it called a Tiger touchdown. It was a game changing screw up by the officials in my opinion! The Horns came out and played a hard fought game. It is very disheartening to work so hard and have the officials make such a difference. Hang in there Horns!d [/quote] Yes, I agree with you. I was told it should have been 20 to 7 at the half hf leading. Heard the down marker officials told HF fans that it was a fumble at the goal line by Silsbee. and of coarse the inadvertent whistle that took away HF pick 6. Could have been a different game. Silsbee is good, but not as good as I thought, and definitely not as good as some of the predictions I saw. They should finish second. [/quote] You had to much of that Kool-Aid!!! -
HAMSHIRE-FANNETT AT SILSBEE BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 49-18!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Just a few quick stats: 1 2 3 4 T Silsbee 14 0 21 14 49 H-F 6 6 0 6 18 Silsbee H-F Passing P. Reed 9-12-173-1-2 D. Smith 11-23-173-1-1 K. Scott 0-1 - 0 -0-1 K. King 1-1-6 Rushing F. Spearman 10-109 4TD J. Brown 22-127 2TD Fum P. Reed 8-46 D. Smith 15-45 Z. Jackson 4-54 TD T. Appling 1-(4) Y. Brydson 4-8 Riley 1-(2) C. Elam 2-77 TD J. Holmes 2-25 K. Scott 3-17 34-333 9.79 ypr 42-165 3.93 ypr Recieving Z. Jackson 3-34 Riley 4-33 C. Elam 2-67 TD T. Appling 3-55 TD M. Garcia 2-47 C. Burrell 3-52 J. Holmes 1-25 M. McCall 2-39 20 First Down 16 13 Rushing 8 7 Passing 8 0 Penalty 0 4-7 57.1% 3rd Down 4-15 26.7% 0-3 0% 4th Down 5-7 71.4% 0 Punt 4 27.5 Avg. PAT 7-7 1 Point 0-3 0-0 2 Point 0-0 3 Turn Over 4 0 Fumble 1 3 INT 1 0 TOD 2 4-30 Penalties 3-15 21:35 TOP 26:25 C. LeBlanc INT Riley Appling Burrell -
HAMSHIRE-FANNETT AT SILSBEE BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 49-18!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="BuckBuck" post="1311636" timestamp="1351312025"] I don't see in the play by play where the "inadvertent whistle" kept the Horns from completing a touchdown run in the open field. Or where the Horns actually covered a fumble in the end zone, but had it called a Tiger touchdown. It was a game changing screw up by the officials in my opinion! The Horns came out and played a hard fought game. It is very disheartening to work so hard and have the officials make such a difference. Hang in there Horns! [/quote] You also did not see in the play by play where the back judge missed a ultimate fight take down by a HF defender on a Tiger reciever that would have been a touchdown on the pass before. P.S. it was the same offical. HF did play a hard fought game. -
[quote name="XDOG" post="1307132" timestamp="1350926669"] Not truck but i bet he can out run a few. [/quote] O-Line, D-Line?
-
Will Silsbee go deep in the playoffs?
STiger85 replied to BADSANTA's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
just a dad don't know jack!!! That person needs to get out from under the rock and find out about what their talking about. SMH -
SILSBEE AT BRIDGE CITY BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 45-20!!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="FootballCrazy1990" post="1299628" timestamp="1350152083"] That'll change when Wos come to town [/quote] We will worry about wos when that week gets here. Right now we have a bye week, then two other games. It'll get here when it gets here, ya'll just have to wait. Go Tigers!!! -
SILSBEE AT BRIDGE CITY BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 45-20!!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="Rake1" post="1299333" timestamp="1350139273"] First of all congrats to Silsbee on the win, they were the better team and deserved the "W". To me you can sum up the game in two words "big plays". Silsbee fumbles opening snap resulting in a BC score, Silsbee breaks a 44yd run for a score, BC runs back a kickoff, Silsbee scores on an 84 yd pass, BC fumbles a kickoff return, and so on. Neither team mounted an impressive offensive series where they[b] drove the ball 70 or 80 yards on a 10 plus play drive[/b], which in the grand scheme of things doesn't really matter (especially if you are Silsbee) if you score on 2 plays. Silsbee played on a short field most of the night and that spelled trouble for the BC defense. I'm not sure where this theory of BC kicking away from the Silsbee return guys came from? I guess if you shank 3 punts then you can call that kicking away from them but that's a stretch at best. Also if you look at BC for the last 3 to 4 years they kickoff to the same area almost religously, that's just how they set up, and yes it drives the fans nuts. One positive thing from last nights game for both teams is there were no injuries. BC really needed to keep everyone healthy, the last few weeks have been hard on the Cardinals. Going forward Silsbee will certainly welcome the bye week, you could tell the injured QB was not as explosive as he has been so the rest will help. For BC the real season will start next week with a trip to HF as the Cardinals try to stay in the hunt for the 3rd playoff spot with the rest of district 21-3A. Silsbee and WOS have virtually locked up playoff spots while the last spot is still up for grabs. The next few weeks will be crazy for sure. Again congrats to the Tigers on a well deserved the win. Rake1 [/quote] In the past several weeks Silsbee rarely takes 10 plays to travel 70 and 80 yards for a TD. -
SILSBEE AT BRIDGE CITY BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 45-20!!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Just a few quick stats: 1 2 3 4 T Silsbee 7 10 21 7 45 Bridge City 7 0 6 7 20 Silsbee Bridge City Passing P. Reed 11-21-213-1 D. Faulk 7-14-54-1-1 Rushing P. Reed 11-48 A. Hunter 20-60 TD F. Spearman 9-30 3 TD K. Dearbonne 6-16 K. Scott 4-13 D. Faulk 5-4 Z. Jackson 2-45 TD T. Huffman 2-4 J. Holmes 2-2 C. Dickerson 1-0 C. Elam 1-27 TD Y. Brydson 1-3 J. Rodgers 1-2 T. Grisham 1-1 Receiving J. Holmes 3-35 C. Smith 2-21 M. Garcia 2-40 A. Schubarth 2-21 Z. Jackson 2-17 T. Carvenka 1-9 TD C. Elam 1-84 TD C. Trahan 1-2 L. Barns 1-17 K. Scott 1-11 J. Rodgers 1-9 14 First Downs 7 7 Rushing 3 6 Passing 3 1 Penalty 1 5-10 50% 3rd Down 3-12 25% 0-2 00% 4th Down 1-2 50% 2-34.5 avg Punt 7-33.1 avg 6-6 PAT 2-3 1-1 20yds Field Goal 0-0 Turn Over 2 Fumble 1 0 INT 1 5-40 Penalties 7-48 20:43 TOP 27:17 C. Elam INT 58 yard return A. Hunter 84 yard C. Bird Fumble recovery kickoff return for TD -
BUNA AT SILSBEE BROADCAST/SILSBEE WINS 44-10!!!
STiger85 replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Just a few quick stats: 1 2 3 4 T Silsbee 7 14 8 15 44 Buna 0 0 2 8 10 Silsbee Buna Passing P. Reed 0-3 G. Patrick 4-12-48-1-2 J. Gore 1-1-(5) K. Scott 7-13-193-2 Rushing K. Scott 7-26 M. Biddle 13-43 F. Spearman 7-3 2TD P. Smith 10-37 R. Reed 3-2 G. Patrick 14-3 Z. Jackson 3-49 TD M. Lopez 7-76 J. Holmes 1-30 TD E. Chamdler 4-16 22-109 4.95 YPC 51-165 3.23 YPC Recieving C. Elam 2-77 TD T. Lejuene 2-18 J. Homes 2-50 M. Biddle 1-27 TD M. Garcia 2-8 P. Smith 1-3 Z. Jackson 1-58 TD L. Barnes 1-(5) 7 First Downs 12 2-8 25% 3rd Down 6-16 37.5 % 1-1 100% 4th Down 0-0 4-35.5 Avj Punt 8-28.125 Avj PAT 4-6 1 Point 0-0 2-2 2 Point 1-1 Turn Over 1 Fumble 1 INT 2 13:25 TOP 34:35 2-10 Penalties 3-40 C. Elam 2 INT C. Byrd Fumble recovery -
Ok I gonna go out on a limb here and say..................................Silsbee takes this one! Go Tigers!!!
-
[quote name="bruno994" post="1288063" timestamp="1349117028"] Not homecoming, say it ain't so...we haven't been a homecoming team for years...I guess that is our true welcome back to 3A (only been gone for 6 years ya know). [b] I may have to run to Wal-Mart during halftime to do our grocery shopping[/b], nothing more boring than the other teams homecoming. As far as Silsbee having 4A talent in 3A, probably a few on the roster are, but just because you have beat a few bad 4A teams, don't start making your reservations for Dallas in December just yet. No doubt the Tigers will unleash some points on the Coogs, but no one in blue and white will give up until the clock reads 00:00, I can assure you that. Go Cougars!! [/quote] You may be making several trips this year!!!
-
7th Grade Silsbee 30 Buna 00 8th Grade Silsbee 26 Buna 00
-
[quote name="bigsoftballfan" post="1288319" timestamp="1349133909"] [quote author=Pay the piper link=topic=103904.msg1287314#msg1287314 date=1349036457] Buna just knows that Silsbee will have 3times the amount of kids on the sideline and 10 kids faster then anyone of the Buna team. So thats really something for yall to be proud of Silsbee. [/quote] Silsbee - 822 Buna - 473 [b]How can you compete with a school that has 349 more kids than you do?[/b][/quote] The ole numbers game huh! OK, Silsbee played four 4A schools in pre-district that avj 380 more kids. Now for a closer look. PN-G has 609 more kids, score 21-20 PN-G. LCM has 301 more kids, score 40-37 Silsbee. Lumberton has 265 more kids, score 41-0 Silsbee. Livingston has 344 more kids, score 43-32 Silsbee. That's how. Go Tigers!!!