True Blue

[quote name="paintballove" post="1081984" timestamp="1318567199"] At high school age they're more than capable of realizing we're in a SEVERE drought, on top of being stupid and burning their own football field. If it weren't for the drought and recent wildfire I would say just re-sod the area and give them a good in-school punishment, but come on... law enforcement needs to come down on them as well. [/quote] :o :o Drought, On a Football field??? I have never seen green grass burn, At least they werent smoking crack, or making meth. Come on Law enforcement comming down on kids, What a fool you sound like>>>>

Bridge City /East Chambers Galena Park North Shore/ Port Arthur Memorial Barbers Hill/ /Galena Park Dayton/ /Nederland Port Neches-Groves /Vidor /Livingston Jasper/ Hamshire-Fannett/ Orangefield Cleveland /Liberty /Woodville /Buna Newton Corrigan-Camden/ West Hardin High Island/ /Oakwood Beaumont Kelly Beaumont Legacy

[quote name="BIGMO44" post="1076837" timestamp="1318048921"] [quote author=Howard link=topic=89441.msg1076688#msg1076688 date=1318043887] Just did the math..Burkeville has given up a total of 254 points this year in six games. That is an average of 42 points a game! It is amazing to think that this team may go to the playoffs????? WTH UIL???? [/quote]DIV I and DIV II 1a is a joke.  It's to give the smaller schools a better chance to compete, but I have always said and still do, two divisions in 1a is just plain silly, IMO [/quote] Three schools makind the playoffs in a 4 team dist. is a joke and a waist of tax payers money, Schools are have a hard time with all the cuts in money, yet now they have to find the money to travel too a playoff game, were the team has NO chance of winning. :(

[quote name="CATMAN" post="1051586" timestamp="1315435319"] Right now HJ BS [/quote] BS    :D    BIG SANDY ;D  Is that the guy that has lost to EVADALE the last few yrs

[quote name="Eagle79" post="1069962" timestamp="1317424975"] [quote author=ECBucFan link=topic=88857.msg1069864#msg1069864 date=1317417155] EC won't have to deal with Newton much longer. The entire Newton school district, Elementary, Middle and Highschool is rated "ACADEMICALLY UNACCEPTABLE", and their entire impoverished community is in continual decline resulting in decreased enrollment. Newton will continue their fall to 2A Div. II soon, and might even be 1A in the years to come. Meanwhile, us "simple minded idiots"  ::)  here at EC will continue to enjoy our growing, academically RECOGNIZED district. So Newton, do continue hurling the insults while you can. Even your revered coach would insult opponents on TV instead of graciously accepting a win. Honor him by keeping that "classy" Newton tradition alive as your decline continues.  8) [/quote] [img][Hidden Content]] Glad ya'll got all those "Academically Recognized" students down there on the [color=red]skeeter[/color] farms. How many have gone to college on football scholarships in the past 10 years ? Sure 'nuff, times are hard up here in the Piney Woods. Timber has been tough due to the economic/housing downturn. You just might get a taste of some of that when all your rice and crawfish fields dry up from the drought. But don't worry yore purty lil head about us. We'll just keep on spanking those spaghetti legged marsh rats and sending [color=red]our stupid kids to college.[/color] Oh yea....Newton by [color=red]3 td's in a nail biter.[/color] EDIT: Long time reader 2nd time poster. Don't mean to come so strong out of the gate, but IMHO, your comments about Coach Barbay just crossed the line. You deserve what you're gonna see tonight. I just wish Shorter wasn't sidelined. It would get REAL ugly out there. [/quote] ;D ;D ;D Now thats some funny $H!&&  Smart skeeters that also can out play those Piney Wood college bound losers ;D 3 tds nail biter  ;D just bet you did not think that those 3 td would be on the EC side. If it would not have been for the two gift TDs you might have just hit that right :D :D

[quote name="dawg13" post="1033494" timestamp="1313023309"] Can guarantee you. You will see different results in all sports, different coaches that will play the best talent that HF HAVE IN ALL SPORTS. [/quote] ;D ;D Looks to be the same results in the first sport of the year, Dont see any change comming in the second sport eather ;D ;D Different yr same winning record or should I say  ;D

I see nothing wrong with cutting the grass cutting job or a job that is doing nothing , But when you do this who in the hell is going to buy that 30,000.00 preis?? Or the $4.00 a gallon milk?? Or the $4.oo gas. I have no prob making 15. hr as long as I dont have to pay 100.00 for a tank of gas. I say send all of them out the gate and hire them back in at 10.00 hr, but that F150 truck cant cost over $ 8000.00. Because there wont be anyone able to buy it if it still going to cost $20,000.

Back on topic .The leader of the Rep party Bill Christel ,said after the debat OUCH is this the best we got... FOUR MORE YRS FOUR MORE YRS ;D ;D ;D

[quote name="ABSENT!" post="1067708" timestamp="1317151697"] Bandkid you are very smart. So you know you can look the debt vs GDP and get a true vision of the debt gained!  Think about it... debt is the numerator and GDP is the denominator.  If the Denominator gets larger then the resulting number is smaller.  If the denominator gets smaller then the resulting number is larger!  Get it!  During Bushes years market value of all final goods produced in America were very high, especially housing, oil products, and weaponry.  Those inflated cost darn near caused the recession.  The debt has been on an exponential growth spurt since the 80s Reagan Tax cuts.  If you know anything about exponential graphs (growth), by nature it leads to infinity!  In other words it had no choice but to end up here.  When we as a country began to decrease taxes on the wealthy we should have been simultaneously decreasing the government because those funds are what allows the government to operate!  But we didn’t and created this monster over the last decade and a half.  Not with just Obama!  That was too long winded. See below [Hidden Content] [/quote] Becarefull there, your starting to make to much sence, they will want you band ;D ;D You have showen that the Bush Reagan Tax cuts only benfited the very rich and HURT THE WORKING CLASS. The top 1% income went up 12% under the Bush Tax Cuts, Did any of your go up anywere close to that????

Barbers Hill Houston North Forest Dayton Houston C.E. King Beaumont Ozen Livingston Vidor Port Neches-Groves Coldspring Cleveland Huffman Anahuac Buna Newton Woodville Beaumont Kelly Jasper West Orange-Stark . Sabine Pass Orange Community Christian Houston St. Pius                                                                                                                                                                Diboll Center   Crockett West Hardin

Barbers Hill Houston North Forest Dayton Houston C.E. King Beaumont Ozen Livingston Vidor Port Neches-Groves Coldspring Cleveland Huffman Anahuac Buna Newton Woodville Beaumont Kelly Jasper West Orange-Stark . Sabine Pass Orange Community Christian Houston St. Pius                                                                                                                                                                Diboll Center   Crockett West Hardin

Why didnt you copy the first part of that page and show what Pres. party was in office when the debt rose the highest, are do you just wont to try and make your side look good.

No I do not think the Reps are the onlyones to blame. The Dem stood by like a bunch of sheep and let Bust have a blank check book. But now we have to make cuts AND raise Taxes to play the bill. And all this delaying is doing nothing to help. You keep saying that the top 1% does not wont to spend any money because they do not know what the goverment is going to do.. So Quite running around the bush, Raise the taxes and then they will know what to execpt, And they will deal with it , they all ways have. I can say this for the Rep. when they get controll they make crap happen, good or bad, the Dem cant agree and anything a they get nothing done.

[quote name="PN-G bamakid" post="1065921" timestamp="1316974892"] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=87540.msg1065918#msg1065918 date=1316974283] [quote author=PN-G bamakid link=topic=87540.msg1065914#msg1065914 date=1316974020] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=87540.msg1065911#msg1065911 date=1316973882] What our nation is faced with today is a mountain of debt run up mostly by 3 Republican Presidents - Ronald Reagan - and the two Bushes. And now today - that very same Republican Party is saying "no way" to Democrats who just want to pay off that pile of Republican debt. Think about it this way - the Republicans ran up a huge credit card bill, and now they're refusing to pay for it. They took the good times - the stimulation to the economy from all that spending and the political benefits from all those wars - and now they don't want to pay for it. If you or I did that with our credit card - and did it intentionally - we'd be in jail. Here is why we are in debt. Before Reagan took office - our national debt was just under one trillion dollars and our top tax rate was 74%. But Reagan promised the nation good times - so he gave all his rich buddies tax cuts - and then put $2 trillion on the nation's credit card. Reagan borrowed and spent - in just 8 years - more money than every president of the United States from George Washington to Jimmy Carter - COMBINED. And now the Republicans don't want to pay the bill for Reagan's debt. [/quote] So your source gets thrown out by raw data and you won't even offer a response? If you're going to continue to copy and paste blogs or articles, at least post the URL. [/quote] So My data is wrong but your from Fox News is right ;D ;D ;D [/quote] Where have I used a source from Fox news in this debate? You used an internet blog. I used a chart comprised of information from three separate federal entities. Which do you think is more reliable? [/quote] Well seeing that YOU are allways saying that the Feds cant get anything right What do you think??

[quote name="SmashMouth" post="1065916" timestamp="1316974245"] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=87540.msg1065911#msg1065911 date=1316973882] What our nation is faced with today is a mountain of debt run up mostly by 3 Republican Presidents - Ronald Reagan - and the two Bushes. And now today - that very same Republican Party is saying "no way" to Democrats who just want to pay off that pile of Republican debt. Think about it this way - the Republicans ran up a huge credit card bill, and now they're refusing to pay for it. They took the good times - the stimulation to the economy from all that spending and the political benefits from all those wars - and now they don't want to pay for it. If you or I did that with our credit card - and did it intentionally - we'd be in jail. Here is why we are in debt. Before Reagan took office - our national debt was just under one trillion dollars and our top tax rate was 74%. But Reagan promised the nation good times - so he gave all his rich buddies tax cuts - and then put $2 trillion on the nation's credit card. Reagan borrowed and spent - in just 8 years - more money than every president of the United States from George Washington to Jimmy Carter - COMBINED. And now the Republicans don't want to pay the bill for Reagan's debt. [/quote] Even your beloved Obama would tell you you're NUTS! [/quote]NO I just dont read Fox news week or Hannity Fox

[quote name="PN-G bamakid" post="1065914" timestamp="1316974020"] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=87540.msg1065911#msg1065911 date=1316973882] What our nation is faced with today is a mountain of debt run up mostly by 3 Republican Presidents - Ronald Reagan - and the two Bushes. And now today - that very same Republican Party is saying "no way" to Democrats who just want to pay off that pile of Republican debt. Think about it this way - the Republicans ran up a huge credit card bill, and now they're refusing to pay for it. They took the good times - the stimulation to the economy from all that spending and the political benefits from all those wars - and now they don't want to pay for it. If you or I did that with our credit card - and did it intentionally - we'd be in jail. Here is why we are in debt. Before Reagan took office - our national debt was just under one trillion dollars and our top tax rate was 74%. But Reagan promised the nation good times - so he gave all his rich buddies tax cuts - and then put $2 trillion on the nation's credit card. Reagan borrowed and spent - in just 8 years - more money than every president of the United States from George Washington to Jimmy Carter - COMBINED. And now the Republicans don't want to pay the bill for Reagan's debt. [/quote] So your source gets thrown out by raw data and you won't even offer a response? If you're going to continue to copy and paste blogs or articles, at least post the URL. [/quote] So My data is wrong but your from Fox News is right ;D ;D ;D

What our nation is faced with today is a mountain of debt run up mostly by 3 Republican Presidents - Ronald Reagan - and the two Bushes. And now today - that very same Republican Party is saying "no way" to Democrats who just want to pay off that pile of Republican debt. Think about it this way - the Republicans ran up a huge credit card bill, and now they're refusing to pay for it. They took the good times - the stimulation to the economy from all that spending and the political benefits from all those wars - and now they don't want to pay for it. If you or I did that with our credit card - and did it intentionally - we'd be in jail. Here is why we are in debt. Before Reagan took office - our national debt was just under one trillion dollars and our top tax rate was 74%. But Reagan promised the nation good times - so he gave all his rich buddies tax cuts - and then put $2 trillion on the nation's credit card. Reagan borrowed and spent - in just 8 years - more money than every president of the United States from George Washington to Jimmy Carter - COMBINED. And now the Republicans don't want to pay the bill for Reagan's debt.

[quote name="stevenash" post="1065849" timestamp="1316967840"] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=87540.msg1065809#msg1065809 date=1316964964] On paper, President Bush added a total of $5.07 trillion to the debt and President Obama will add $1.44 trillion. However, approximately $1.14 of the latter figure is as a result of President Bush’s mismanagement of the economy. In other words, the real numbers should be $6.21 trillion of additional spending by President Bush and only $0.3 trillion by President Obama. If you add in the $126 billion in savings that President Obama will make on defense spending, he will only be responsible for about $0.17 trillion of new spending, about 4% of what President Bush was responsible for. As the total national debt is around $14.7 trillion, President Bush singlehandedly created almost half of it! [/quote] Blue, I am imagining that not everybody is going to accept your numbers as the gospel [/quote]President Bush spent almost $1.5 trillion on the Afghanistan and Iraq wars and didn’t count them as a part of his annual budgets. President Obama has shut down the Iraq War, but increased expenditures on the Afghanistan war and may spend around $700 million on the military action in Libya (which is about the cost of four days of the Afghanistan war effort). President Bush gave away over $1.8 trillion in tax cuts for the extremely rich and for corporations. President Obama spent $425 billion on stimulus tax cuts after the recession that the Bush administration caused. In other words, a more correct figure is $2.225 trillion in tax cuts as a result of President Bush’s mismanagement. Non-defense discretionary spending amounted to $608 billion under President Bush, more than twice the $278 billion that President Obama is expected to spend. President Bush spent a total of just under $1 trillion on bailouts and stimulus funding ($224 billion on TARP and $773 billion on the 2008 stimulus attempts). President Obama spent $711 on stimulus funding. Again, the true tally should be $224+773+711, i.e. $1.708 trillion as a result of Bush’s actions and zero as a result of President Obama’s policy changes. President Bush spent $180 billion on unfunded Medicare drug benefit changes that primarily put money into the hands of the Big Pharmas. President Obama spent $152 billion on health care reform and entitlement changes. Incidentally, the Republicans continually lie about the latter figure when they say that “Obamacare”, their deprecatory label for the health care reform bill, will cost $1 trillion. It won’t and they know it. If they were to repeal it the cost over ten years would be around $340 billion.

On paper, President Bush added a total of $5.07 trillion to the debt and President Obama will add $1.44 trillion. However, approximately $1.14 of the latter figure is as a result of President Bush’s mismanagement of the economy. In other words, the real numbers should be $6.21 trillion of additional spending by President Bush and only $0.3 trillion by President Obama. If you add in the $126 billion in savings that President Obama will make on defense spending, he will only be responsible for about $0.17 trillion of new spending, about 4% of what President Bush was responsible for. As the total national debt is around $14.7 trillion, President Bush singlehandedly created almost half of it!

Dont have a dog in this fight But Players( Kids) win games and coaches lose them.. Any coach with any class would never call his team out that this one did. The OC or the Super. need to set this guy down and tell him that>>>

[quote name="beechnut" post="1065349" timestamp="1316903859"] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=88790.msg1065346#msg1065346 date=1316903704] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88790.msg1065332#msg1065332 date=1316903020] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=88790.msg1065272#msg1065272 date=1316899530] [quote author=basketball25 link=topic=88790.msg1065073#msg1065073 date=1316884165] With the lack of talent i think lumberton has looked pretty good,they are competing and playing with alot of heart!!! [/quote] To much WHITE FLIGHT, not enough speed on the sidelines. You wont a good football team, stay in Beaumont, Won't to live in a White town, teach your kids to play golf ;D [/quote]TrueBlue, you are a racist and a retard...but I'll stop at that.  I think your small-minded inflammatory comment was posted simply to start a bunch of arguments. [/quote]OH OK I am not the one with the White sheets hanging  in the back rooms. Safe homes, low crime rate, clean streets, and a bad football team. [/quote] Bla Bla Bla stay on topic kid. [/quote] I thought that was the topic, Lumberton does not need a new coach, They need a little speed and kids that can jump.

[quote name="SmashMouth" post="1065332" timestamp="1316903020"] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=88790.msg1065272#msg1065272 date=1316899530] [quote author=basketball25 link=topic=88790.msg1065073#msg1065073 date=1316884165] With the lack of talent i think lumberton has looked pretty good,they are competing and playing with alot of heart!!! [/quote] To much WHITE FLIGHT, not enough speed on the sidelines. You wont a good football team, stay in Beaumont, Won't to live in a White town, teach your kids to play golf ;D [/quote]TrueBlue, you are a racist and a retard...but I'll stop at that.  I think your small-minded inflammatory comment was posted simply to start a bunch of arguments. [/quote]OH OK I am not the one with the White sheets hanging  in the back rooms. Safe homes, low crime rate, clean streets, and a slow football team.

[quote name="SHSTIGER" post="1065279" timestamp="1316900197"] [quote author=True Blue link=topic=88790.msg1065272#msg1065272 date=1316899530] [quote author=basketball25 link=topic=88790.msg1065073#msg1065073 date=1316884165] With the lack of talent i think lumberton has looked pretty good,they are competing and playing with alot of heart!!! [/quote] To much WHITE FLIGHT, not enough speed on the sidelines. You wont a good football team, stay in Beaumont, Won't to live in a White town, teach your kids to play golf ;D [/quote] ::) ::) ::) What if you want to grow up knowing the difference in won't and want? [/quote]Do you want a winning football team, are do you wont to play golf

[quote name="basketball25" post="1065073" timestamp="1316884165"] With the lack of talent i think lumberton has looked pretty good,they are competing and playing with alot of heart!!! [/quote] To much WHITE FLIGHT, not enough speed on the sidelines. You wont a good football team, stay in Beaumont, Won't to live in a White town, teach your kids to play golf ;D

Nederland Newton Crosby Barbers Hill Central LCM Livingston Liberty Woodville Kountze West Brook PA Memorial Kelly Bridge City Silsbee Hull-Daisetta San Augustine West Hardin WOS Galveston O'Connel Cayuga West Sabine Hemphill Diboll Wills Point