fwstangs

Correct Dugat gone from Cougs for good . Do not attend classes, do not play college football.

Awesome - we can all learn from this example. This is the kind of role model behavior we all love to see. Other coaches (and us  fans) should all follow suit. Thanks for sharing!

Ricos mexican on research blvd in the woodlands! Awesome food!

[quote name="OrangeFBfan" post="841426" timestamp="1283897604"] Glad to see WO-S in the top 15 after a quality performance against Friendswood. Stay under the radar!  ;) [/quote] They will keep climbing - very talented team.

[quote name="bh89-2" post="841260" timestamp="1283883975"] [quote author=PURPLE 4EVER link=topic=72613.msg841219#msg841219 date=1283881409] Who will it be... Right now the standings are... #1 Galena Park 2-0 CE King 1-1 North Forest 1-10 and then.... Barbers Hill 0-2 Crosby 0-2 Lee 0-2 Memorial 0-2 Dayton 0-1 Who will the last team be that finally gets a "w". This week Barbers Hill plays Nederland, Crosby takes on Pearland Dawson, Lee battles Terry, Memorial takes on Manvel, and Dayton plays Angleton. All 5 teams from 19-4A could be considered as the underdogs with Dayton maybe getting the nod in a very good contest against Angleton. [/quote] According to the na-sayers, santa fe was not good when they beat BH, however they beat angleton the next week.  Dayton and BH get a win this week. [/quote] Santa Fe beat Brazosport not expected to make much noise this year.

[quote name="w" post="841433" timestamp="1283897988"] FW Stangs has no clue what he is talking about.  The REASON the asst. coach "went after" the refs was to ask why there was no time left on the clock because the ball was thrown out of bounds with 3 seconds left on the clock.  THAT is why he went over to the ref after the game.  You would think he would just leave it alone.  He won the game, get over it!  Geez!!!!! [/quote] Ok , ok yall brought in the specifics. If that is how you want your role models to behave. Fine. I hope the assistant coach who gets it and pulled the out of control coach away from the refs and the cops is ok, looks like he might have separated his shoulder tackling his peer.

After watching an assistant coach for a team totally lose it and go after the refs after the game, for a team with a highly respected head coach, I agree that some of these teams have some issues. It is tough for the head coach to control folks in the situation, it has to start before that with a standard and if you do not meet that standard, you are gone. I would not renew the assistants contract if I was the head coach of the team I saw do that recently.

[quote name="HUM398" post="834873" timestamp="1283175592"] [quote author=Jackthehammer link=topic=72157.msg834869#msg834869 date=1283175264] Wow thats a wild prediction. Ill remember that one. 50 to 14 Dayton over Angleton [/quote] ive completely lost respect for Angelton after watching them scrimmage Lee, and seeing my prediction of a blow out (Made amongst my friends) by Friendswood. Angelton suffers from a defective defensive startagy that lends itself to believe they are so superior athletically that they can just lineup and take you on. Angleton is small, fast, and prone to mental lapses. Offensively they are a one trick pony, that will be held to minimal yardage by a good to great defense. Angleton 2010 reminds me of Cy-Ridge 08'....except smaller and more athletic across the board.  three teams with good to great defenses held Russel Shepard to less then 100 yards. it really wouldn't suprise me to see Angelton's Diggs with less then 100 yards. [/quote] I share your assessment of Angleton - I do not know if it will be a blow out, but Dayton should win by 14. I also agree that it appears Dayton's D is stronger than FW. In fact if our D does not get better, we will not have a good postseason, if we make it.

Agree - PNG by 14 at least.

Interesting debate. No doubt Dayton is good and has had a good run the last several years. No doubt 20-4A has the storied history. It is also fairly clear that top to bottom 20-4a is the better district this year. I can tell you something else, none of us 4a teams want to play WOS every week. Those boys are good and feisty. FW is glad to be done with them!! Handily beat Nederland and gave FW all we could handle and more! Should be a fun year. Ps - keep on eye out for Manvel and Lamarque this year in 244a, they did not get the preseason hype that FW, Dawson and Ball got, but they may be the best two teams in our district!!

[quote name="BrenhamFan" post="839949" timestamp="1283714316"] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72449.msg838732#msg838732 date=1283612300] Keep telling folks - watch out for Manvel, they could win the district. Very very good team. Picked by Galveston county news to finish last or next to last. Not. [/quote] Hey I said they were really good after we scrimmaged them.  You would have to be an idiot to pick them to finish last.  They are a very fast and aggresive team. [/quote] I know you did! Others are just now figuring that out!

[quote name="Gasilla" post="838854" timestamp="1283620570"] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=72416.msg838847#msg838847 date=1283620278] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=72416.msg838814#msg838814 date=1283617730] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=72416.msg838808#msg838808 date=1283617270] There is a big difference in saying you did not play your best and saying you played terrible. ;) I can understand if FW did not play their best, but that does not always equate to playing terrible. [/quote] It's all subjective... To him, his QB made 2 bad throws and got picked off. To us, our DB'S made 2 good plays on the ball and caused them. To us, our receiver made a bad play by fumbling after a 20 yard gain. To them, they made a good defensive play by stripping our reciever. To them, their lineman missed their assignments and their QB got sacked. To us, our D-lineman were just to fast for them and got by them. It's really a retarded argument and an endless loop. You can break a football game down over and over... all that really matters is the end result because the reasons for the cause and effect of the outcome can be said for both sides.   [/quote] Gas, what about the subjectiveness of a wet or dry field? ;) ;D Never could figure out how a field was more wet for one team and not the other. ;) ;D ::) [/quote] Right!?! Amazing! You know, some people just play better on wet fields... LOL ;) B/T/W- how did you know how many yards FW had? Are there some stats for this game somewhere? [/quote] It is a messed up boxscore, mixed up rushing with receiving for FW. Stats and game film help you really understand what you think you saw live!! [url=[Hidden Content] WOs boxscoreFW WOS boxscore[/url] Friendswood 35, West Orange-Stark 34 - Final West Orange-Stark Overall: 1-1 District: 0-0 Friendswood Overall: 2-0 District: 0-0 Boxscore Friday September 3, 2010 7:00pm 1 2 3 4 Total West Orange-Stark 8 12 8 6 34 Friendswood 7 7 7 14 35 Scoring summary FRI -- Jonathan Johnson 50-yard run (Zachary Hardy kick), 07:29, 1st. WOS -- Britton Lindsey 43-yard run (Darius Mitchell run), 06:06, 1st. WOS -- Britton Lindsey 4-yard run (kick failed), 11:23, 2nd. WOS -- Mark Roberts 41-yard pass from Reggie Garrett (kick failed), 07:24, 2nd. FRI -- Jonathan Johnson 31-yard pass from Peter Maetzold (Zachary Hardy kick), 05:09, 2nd. FRI -- Jordan Bolton 36-yard pass from Peter Maetzold (Zachary Hardy kick), 06:49, 3rd. WOS -- Darius Mitchell 10-yard pass from Reggie Garrett (Darius Mitchell run), 02:49, 3rd. FRI -- Jonathan Johnson 20-yard run, 09:32, 4th. WOS -- Mark Roberts 35-yard pass from Reggie Garrett (kick failed), 01:58, 4th. FRI -- Peter Maetzold 1-yard run (Zachary Hardy kick), 00:30, 4th. Team Stats West Orange-Stark Friendswood Total yards 407 450 First downs 19 24 Rushes/Yds 29/147 41/211 Average rush 5.07 5.15 Comp/Atts 21/31/2 13/19/1 Pass yards 260 239 Comp pct 67.74 68.42 Punts 3 3 Punting Yards 91 117 Punting Average 30.33 39 Fumbles/Lost 0/0 0/0 Penalties-yards 11-117 6-59 West Orange-Stark Passing Name Comp Att Pct Yds TD INT Reggie Garrett 13 19 68.42 239 3 1 Rushing Name Att Yds Yds/Att Long TD Brenson Lindsey 11 98 8.9 0 2 Receiving Name Rec Yds Yds/Catch Long TD Mark Roberts 6 158 26.3 0 2 Friendswood Passing Name Comp Att Pct Yds TD INT Peter Maetzold 21 31 67.74 260 2 2 Rushing Name Att Yds Yds/Att Long TD Matt Kennemer 5 76 15.2 0 0 Jonathan Johnson 3 37 12.3 0 1 Jordan Bolton 3 58 19.3 0 1 Justin Battle 3 38 12.7 0 0 Johnson Thomas 17 142 8.4 0 2 Receiving Name Rec Yds Yds/Catch Long TD Matt Kennemer 1 40 40 0 1

[quote name="Gasilla" post="838820" timestamp="1283618154"] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72416.msg838809#msg838809 date=1283617313] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=72416.msg838807#msg838807 date=1283617188] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72416.msg838800#msg838800 date=1283616779] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=72416.msg838768#msg838768 date=1283615055] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72416.msg838750#msg838750 date=1283613823]6 sacks. 2 picks. Poor punting. Missed blocking assignments, missed coverage assignments,  Missed a field goal he makes routinely. Defense played poorly - but as someone pointed out, our d gave up a lot of yards against Angelton. But again, again, again - some of that is the great play by WOS - and before some one gets offended, in the game of football , some of your bad plays are because the other guy beat you and some of your bad plays are because you did not execute. We had plenty of both. [/quote] ...and that can be said for either side. [/quote] Do not know how many times I can say I agree. You are real good at reactionary posts, lets see your super football qualified assessment of the game. Would be a good read,  ;D [/quote] Wow that was really deep and analytical. Go back to your foot on the next posts - they fit your style better.  Gassy - you need glasses!! Well, if you look back I gave it already... But I will give it again just for you.  ;D Two good teams went toe to toe and the difference was one had an accomplished kicker and the others, obviously, is not there yet. All of the other crap, as said before, can be said for both teams. I wish the refs would have stayed out of it more, but it is what it is. [/quote] [/quote] I don't have to give a 2 page essay to try and exhibit my knowledge of the game. I know cause I've done it. I'll leave the trying to make impressions on a message board by tedious film breakdown to guys like you... ;) ;D I have to be honest with you though, I can appreciate you in a way. After all of this going back and forth I have to appreciate someone who is as stubborn as I am. [/quote] I got exposed to film review when I played ball and feel it is essential. I do not have the energy for 2 pages either. Good luck!

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="838808" timestamp="1283617270"] There is a big difference in saying you did not play your best and saying you played terrible. ;) I can understand if FW did not play their best, but that does not always equate to playing terrible. [/quote] Full agreement! We did not play terrible!!

[quote name="Gasilla" post="838807" timestamp="1283617188"] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72416.msg838800#msg838800 date=1283616779] [quote author=Gasilla link=topic=72416.msg838768#msg838768 date=1283615055] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72416.msg838750#msg838750 date=1283613823]6 sacks. 2 picks. Poor punting. Missed blocking assignments, missed coverage assignments,  Missed a field goal he makes routinely. Defense played poorly - but as someone pointed out, our d gave up a lot of yards against Angelton. But again, again, again - some of that is the great play by WOS - and before some one gets offended, in the game of football , some of your bad plays are because the other guy beat you and some of your bad plays are because you did not execute. We had plenty of both. [/quote] ...and that can be said for either side. [/quote] Do not know how many times I can say I agree. You are real good at reactionary posts, lets see your super football qualified assessment of the game. Would be a good read,  ;D [/quote] Wow that was really deep and analytical. Go back to your foot on the next posts - they fit your style better.  Gassy - you need glasses!! Well, if you look back I gave it already... But I will give it again just for you.  ;D Two good teams went toe to toe and the difference was one had an accomplished kicker and the others, obviously, is not there yet. All of the other crap, as said before, can be said for both teams. I wish the refs would have stayed out of it more, but it is what it is. [/quote]

[quote name="Gasilla" post="838768" timestamp="1283615055"] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72416.msg838750#msg838750 date=1283613823]6 sacks. 2 picks. Poor punting. Missed blocking assignments, missed coverage assignments,  Missed a field goal he makes routinely. Defense played poorly - but as someone pointed out, our d gave up a lot of yards against Angelton. But again, again, again - some of that is the great play by WOS - and before some one gets offended, in the game of football , some of your bad plays are because the other guy beat you and some of your bad plays are because you did not execute. We had plenty of both. [/quote] ...and that can be said for either side. [/quote] Do not know how many times I can say I agree. You are real good at reactionary posts, lets see your super football qualified assessment of the game. Would be a good read,  ;D

[quote name="tigersvoice" post="838764" timestamp="1283614712"] [quote author=fwstangs link=topic=72416.msg838750#msg838750 date=1283613823] [quote author=AggiesAreWe link=topic=72416.msg838741#msg838741 date=1283613268] I find it very difficult to believe that any team that has over 450 yards of offense and 35 points against a WOS defense, played terribly. ::) Go blow that smoke somewhere else. [/quote] 6 sacks. 2 picks. Poor punting. Missed blocking assignments, missed coverage assignments,  Missed a field goal he makes routinely. Defense played poorly - but as someone pointed out, our d gave up a lot of yards against Angelton. But again, again, again - some of that is the great play by WOS - and before some one gets offended, in the game of football , some of your bad plays are because the other guy beat you and some of your bad plays are because you did not execute. We had plenty of both. We can fix the latter and that is what we will start working on! Sorry - not our best played game - not meaning to offend anyone, but that is the fact for us! I wish I could say we just played the best game of our lives, but as another WOS poster said - WOS can not say that either! Lots of things for WOS to work on also. That is all - no slams, just observations after breaking down the film. Football is alot more than the stat sheet. [/quote] I agree with your points, but answer me this - YOU broke down the film of the game? [/quote] Yes - had my teams filmed for years when I was a coach and learned how to break them down. Do the same for my sons team. Got a lot of help on how to do this from cousin who played at UT.

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="838741" timestamp="1283613268"] I find it very difficult to believe that any team that has over 450 yards of offense and 35 points against a WOS defense, played terribly. ::) Go blow that smoke somewhere else. [/quote] 6 sacks. 2 picks. Poor punting. Missed blocking assignments, missed coverage assignments,  Missed a field goal he makes routinely. Defense played poorly - but as someone pointed out, our d gave up a lot of yards against Angelton. But again, again, again - some of that is the great play by WOS - and before some one gets offended, in the game of football , some of your bad plays are because the other guy beat you and some of your bad plays are because you did not execute. We had plenty of both. We can fix the latter and that is what we will start working on! Sorry - not our best played game - not meaning to offend anyone, but that is the fact for us! I wish I could say we just played the best game of our lives, but as another WOS poster said - WOS can not say that either! Lots of things for WOS to work on also. That is all - no slams, just observations after breaking down the film. Football is alot more than the stat sheet.

[quote name="skipper" post="838739" timestamp="1283612986"] the one thin that scared the H$$ out of me was the SIZE and SPEED of the FW OL and DL line ,my lord i never seen a high school with that size some of these kids could play in the NFL [/quote] Yeah but that coach of yours find the ones that will not and ran at the right ones and away from the ones that could make plays. Great job of gameplanning!

Keep telling folks - watch out for Manvel, they could win the district. Very very good team. Picked by Galveston county news to finish last or next to last. Not.

[quote name="Kville99" post="838720" timestamp="1283611427"] If you were to take this thread and put it next to the thread of a certain 2A team WOS played last year it would look alot like the shoe is on the other foot with [b]SOME[/b] of the posters... I'm referring to the refs and their excessive penalties, not stopping the clock, and the being outcoached and outplayed by a smaller school. [/quote] Yep. Geez, am trying to close this one out but they will not let me, keep whining about the refs, whining about us and not focusing on what people are saying. Good team effort, great job against a 4a team, bright season ahead. Yes both sides have beefs about calls, i was just trying to point some of that out - god forbid we talk about penalties, and that is always the case in close games. Each team had enough self induced mistakes to work on. Gassy - so glad you closed with a classy gassy post. There was a lot of hard hitting on both sides. Both teams walked off that field worn out and knowing they played a good team. Later.

[quote name="Jackthehammer" post="838703" timestamp="1283609971"] Really this went from a self-proclaimed blowout to a oops we almost lost our ranking. It went from we are the bigger and better coached team to they outcoached us and there little small school (thats 3A) almost embarrased us. Come on FW WOS was all you could handle.  Good thing there not 4A. Great Game WOS you did SETX proud [/quote] WOS should have a very good year and do well. I hope FW does as well. Good luck and we will be following you and hoping you go far in the playoffs. Very talented team, with a great coaching staff. Have funa nd enjoy the ride.

[quote name="Jackthehammer" post="838683" timestamp="1283609091"] FW gave it there best and it took there best to get by a 3A team. [/quote] Yep - lost 4 starters due to cut blocks - WOS blocks a lot like Georgia Tech. Reserves had to step up.

[quote name="skipper" post="838678" timestamp="1283608984"] how can a rec catch a ball 8 foot over his head-----------------YOU CANT. [/quote] Called defensive holding fella! Look at in the tape, very clear.

[quote name="skipper" post="838672" timestamp="1283608467"] first to the young kids that played there hearts out (WE AS WO-S FOOTBALL FANS ARE VERY PROUD OF YOU). this game is history so dont look back at it, LOOK FORWARD and keep your heads up becouse you still have some very good teams ahead of you to play,just keep up the good work and it will (PAY OFF) in the end.now  to the coaching staff at WO-S , super job  now you got your work cut out for you DONT LET YOUR KIDS LOOK BACK . [/quote] Ditto and the same to FW. Do not hang your heads because of how you played, WOS is a very good team and a good game to get ready for LaMarque, Dawson and Manvel.