stevenash

Of course it won't happen. My statement on GDP is factual. She likes to suggest that I dont have adequate education to offer my two cents in these discussions. 35 years of on the job training beat the heck out of 4 or 6 years in a classroom. Big Girl, i left school in the second grade because they could not promote me past my father( no doubt, you will accept that statement as factual) Along the way, I have a couple of close friends( one goes back to childhood) with whom I talk at least every other week and more frequently, when necessary. Hence, much of my information comes from them. Lets see if you find their educational levels to be acceptable. [Hidden Content] [Hidden Content]

Daddy was not translated, it was spoken as Daddy. ( not papi)

I guess I don't understand very well. I assume you are referring to the upcoming end. I still dont find that even quantified.

You have NEVER done it when it comes to the economy. It is an area in which you are totally lost ( aka unable to differentiate between debt and deficit) Come on, prove my statistics wrong. SHould be easy for you ( if you are correct, and you are NOT)

[Hidden Content],%22sort%22:%22asc%22%7D

Quick FYI; If my information is incorrect, it ought to be very simple for someone as intellectually superior as you to prove it quickly with a quick search on the internet. Just think how delightful that would be for you to prove me wrong and embarrass me by showing everyone I don't know what I am talking about. Please take a few minutes and do so.

Does Mommy and Daddy sound the same to you as mommy and Papa?

My sources are spot on and verifiable. Nice try. Nothing new. When you can't refute something(because you know ZERO) about it, just say the source is not trustworthy. Been dealing with this stuff for over 30 years, so yes, I know PRECISELY what I am talking about.

Sorry sir, but you obviously did not hear what I heard. Therefore your supposition is incorrect

I am so curious about this can you tell me why, only in America, legal citizens are labeled as "racists" and "Nazis" but illegal aliens are called "Dreamers"?

PamFam, you remarked earlier that the good economy under Trump is simply Trump "riding the wave created by Obama". GDP is the broadest and most recognized barometer of economic health. In 2016, GDP declined from 2015. In 2015, GDP declined from 2014. Obama was the only President in modern history to NEVER have a single year of 3% or greater GDP growth. Please explain to me ( when in free thinking mode, of course) the condition of the " wave" when Mr. Trump entered office. Big Girl, feel free to add your "macro economics" expertise to this question.

BECAUSE there are 5.3 whites for every 1 black living in this country.

total OUTRIGHT lie. Those words were not spoken by Trump. When he said he thought there were good people on both sides of the issue, YOU and MSNBC and your "associates" immediately created the perception that he said white supremacists were good people. Just another classic example.

Interesting example of "free" and "objective" thinking

Not quite as interesting when one realizes that 14% of population is black and 75% of population is white

Since you are a free thinker, does your free thinking understand that black unemployment is at record lows under the current president? Yet, you say the the right hasnt' tried?

>

I can tell you what they have done. The have SAID about what they were going to get done. They have SAID that they are the only ones who "care" Lots of talk and zero walk.

Have also heard that some of the pictures they are using are from 2014

and CURRENT policies have black unemployment at the lowest point in recorded history

Listened to the media play a video of retained children calling out for Mommy and Daddy, in English. Didn't know that people from El Salvador, Guatemala, etc would be so fluent in our language( or could they possibly have been instructed on what words to use or possibly not actually been illegal immigrants? nah, the integrity laden media would never do something like that)

Just bring Gestapo with you and make sure the other teams no they are with you.

“In March of 1993, The United States Supreme Court issued a ruling in Flores vs Reno. (Yes, “That” Reno. Janet Reno, Bill Clinton’s first Attorney General who ordered that young Elian Gonzalez be torn from his parents arms while hiding in a Miami closet. You might remember the iconic photograph.) The Court decided that minors could not be incarcerated with the adults accompanying them across the United States border illegally. The decision was the result of a long dispute in how to best care for these children while the adults were detained for criminal proceedings. You see, when aliens cross the border illegally, they are incarcerated until their criminal case is decided. The understandable argument at the time was “why should children be incarcerated while their parents are in jail?” It seemed a fundamental violation of international human rights. Makes sense, right? As a result, The Flores case drew a line in the sand. Children could not be incarcerated with their parents or accompanying adult while being held for illegal immigration violations. And a subsequent 1997 agreement stipulated that children must be placed in a safer environment where they could enjoy certain privileges, including education, a clean, safe environment and other normal life cycle amenities that incarcerated individuals do not enjoy. It was considered a “victory” for human rights. By separating adult and child, we protected the children, reducing any harm done to them for their parent’s or accompanying adult’s decisions. A lot has happened since then. However; bottom line, these juvenile, shelters have been operating in accordance with the law, and overseen by the Department of Health and Human Services to protect those children from the hazards of parental incarceration since 1997. So, since Donald Trump was running his real estate empire, selling wine and casinos in 1993, we are left to determine just how he managed to orchestrate this cruel “separation of immigrant parent and child” 25 years BEFORE he was President of the United States. The obvious answer is, he didn’t. He had nothing to do with establishing this United States immigration policy. Today, he simply enforces it. This one story illustrates how important it is for us to do our research regarding today’s headlines. The Corporate Media either refuses to do the research, is incapable of doing the research or has done the research and decided to lie to you about its findings. Either way, this would make the Corporate Media lazy, incompetent or just plain deceptive. Liars, if you will.”

Now that President Trump has signed the executive order, will the left/media go back to Stormy Daniels or is there a new "crisis" about to begin?