stevenash

Of course, we shouldnt bring anything to the forefront that could suggest the possibility of culpability on any side but one. I understand and will try to contain my opinions as we usher in the new era of tolerance, civility and mutual respect. Qualities that a certain President regularly promoted.. ( Bottom line is the FACT that there is ignorance on both sides and some seem unwilling to acknowledge it)

Sadly these seriously flawed theories/values/beliefs are either wittingly or unwittingly handed down from generation to generation thus impairing the ability of certain "wounds" to heal. These attitudes are frequently accompanied by defiance/recalcitrance. Addtionally, such utterly pathetic conclusions are indicative of "mal-enlightenment"

[Hidden Content]

BG and Tobie aren't gonna like this!!!!!

Yes it is- and those to whom you refer often question our intellect and demand evidence of the amount of formal education attained.

Thank you I already feel more enlightened. Within that enlightenment comes the realization that the bet/proposal had serious flaws in it as evidenced by the results.

But this is ok because the left "cares" more and is more "compassionate". Since Trump would not condemn the white nationalists/neo Nazis immediately( before waiting for fact gathering) he is DEFINITELY a racist and is sympathetic to those two groups. However , the refusal by Mr. Obama to call radical Islamic terrorism by its name for 8 years certainly does not imply any sympathy for those folks.

Excuse me. I thought that the validity/viability/safety of a bet is whether or not it was won or lost. But now I am learning that is not how one judges it. Instead, it is judged on whether or not someone would take the other side. Still learning here. I will consider this as part of my attempt to become "enlightened".

I believe I did answer your question. Either you didn't read it or you don't like what you heard, so you ignored.

Good answer. I will just sit back with you and watch the "praise" roll in from others.

Especially the one you and Nate Silver made

Rest assured that you will also never be accused of being well reasoned or enlightened.

No substantive responses will come forth. Although Tobie might mention KKK, Klannity, and Gram em.

Well stated sir. Just remember that "idoits" cannot be eliminated.

Ultra enlightenment is fast approaching. Utopia is imminent.

But that Russia Collusion thing is the real deal.

Do you agree with the Big GIrl theory that all Republicans are not racist but all racists are Republicans?

Big GIrl- please respond ASAP to the above question posed to you by WOSgrad

Ah yes, nothing like the well reasoned objective conclusion as this one. Critical , in depth thinking/reasoning at it's absolute finest.

Perhaps his position on gay marriage would have "evolved" like it did for Mr. Obama. (certainly not for politcal expediency)

Since Mr. King was against gay marriage, does this mean his statues need to be taken down?

Surely you don't mean that all of the Russia stuff, Nazi accusations, racist accusations, bigot accusations, homophobia accusations, xenophobe accusations, etc.etc. etc. are not having their desired impact? Imagine that. I guess they should have focused more on Mr. Trump lying about his golf handicap.

Because poverty is non discriminatory. Hence the U.S. is an equal opportunity country in spite of many trying to change that to an equal outcome country.

Dove, How do you decide who does and who doesn't (amongst the white folks) have understanding and empathy? What qualifies one as being understanding and empathetic? If I don't like the way Mr. Obama handled his term in office, does that make me lacking in understanding and empathy?