stevenash

.."Your children's children will live under communism. You Americans are so gullible. No, you won't accept communism outright; but, we will keep feeding you small doses of socialism until you will finally wake up and find you already have Communism. We will not have to fight you. We will so weaken your economy, until you will fall like overripe fruit into our hands. The democracy will cease to exist when you take away from those who are willing to work and give to those who would not" It was September 29, 1959, when Nikita Khrushchev delivered his prediction for America at the United Nations. I was one years old, but I remember like it was yesterday the television coverage of him banging his shoe on the podium. At that time, just the word "communism" was feared throughout our nation. Remember this. Socialism leads to Communism How do you create a Socialist State? There are eight levels of control: 1) Healthcare - Control healthcare and you control the people 2) Poverty - Increase the poverty level as high as possible, poor people are easier to control and will not fight back if you are providing everything for them. 3) Debt - Increase the debt to an unsustainable level. That way you are able to increase taxes, and this will produce more poverty. 4) Gun Control - Remove the ability to defend themselves from the government . That way you are able to create a police state. 5) Welfare - Take control of every aspect (food, housing, income) of their lives because that will make them fully dependent on the government. 6) Education - Take control of what people read, listen to and take control of what children learn in school. 7) Religion - Remove the belief in God from the government and schools because the people need to believe in ONLY the government knowing what is best for the people. 8)Class Warfare - Divide the people into the wealthy and the poor. Eliminate the middle class. This will cause more discontent and it will be easier to tax the rich with the support of the poor. Statement by a pretty well known individual

The Examiner noted, “Such an admission from Eisgruber raises concerns that Princeton has been receiving tens of millions of dollars of federal funds in violation of Title VI of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, which declares that ‘no person in the United States shall, on the ground of race, color, or national origin, be excluded from participation in, be denied the benefits of, or be subjected to discrimination under any program or activity receiving Federal financial assistance.’”

Isnt there a circumstance where one sector of students does not have to meet the same testing requirements as other sectors?

Uh, oh. Another chain yanker. (self perceived, of course)

amen on the Sierra Club- hmmmm I wonder if they are a left leaning group?

Officials say at least 13 of the CA fires were started by downed power lines Didn't know climate change can down power lines I have not verified the above, but if it is true, the federal government is not likely the caretaker for any power lines.

And how is it that you know that none of these anarchists are democrats or are associated with the democratic party, UT Alum? Playing semantics doesnt alter the situation that most rational folks believe exists.

No need for a link unless you have one that shows a direct corelation between population density and frequency of fires. As for free market expounding, the state already has more regulations than any state in the union. Figured you would think that was a great thing

Wonder why the other surrounding states with large tracts of forests ( and I suspect a similar division between govt, private enterprise and state) dont have near the frequency of fires that California has?

So you honestly believe that the funds from the increased taxes are better deployed and more productive by the government than by private industry? If so, why not a 60% corporate tax rate. The government is the absolute worst steward of funds and creates nothing but more bureaucracy plus the cos

Do you mean like your "calculation of 160,000 few deaths"?

Good leadership would have imposed some sort of restrictions on the private interests and state interests instead of allowing situation to worsen every year

Do you think that another example of good leadership in California would have been to move some of the attention given to straws to forest management?

Here is a good context for you: If you like your doctor/'healthcare plan, you can keep it.

SETXfan- please listen to the individual in the video above and let me know what is wrong with this individuals thoughts?

They know that. But they truly believe that the bad life decisions were made because they were in a predicament caused by white folk. The ultimate goal here is reparations and, if and when that happens, the tank will be empty and new methods of victimology will be needed.

He has a problem with that but apparently no problem whatsoever with cop killings. I wonder why?

Sorry no assumptions here. Presenting alternative possibilities worth considering If you wish to run from the questions, feel free. It is very telling. You still did not answer my question about how you knew what he wanted if you couldnt hear him? How did you know it was harrassment? How did you know that he wasn't seeking information from you in regard to a potential suspect somewhere in the area?

You may have not done anything. He may have needed information from you regarding a nearby incident. Sounds to me like you "assumed" he was harrassing you and that is something you learned at home and probably will teach at home. Very unhealthy. Just as it is wrong for a policeman to assume that every black person is a criminal, it is equally wrong for a black person to assume a police officer seeks an opportunity to harm said black person.

What is wrong with that. Shouldnt both sides of a story be heard?

How do you know if he was harrassing you if you couldnt hear him? How did you already know it was for no good reason?

Did you walk away without repercussions or are you still standing there?

You stood there confused? How did the confusion get resolved?