stevenash

You don't understand BS Wildcats. None of what you say happened. You and the others of which you speak were simply manipulated into thinking that Mrs. Clinton and Mrs. Rice lied. They spoke the unvarnished truth- you are simply too ignorant to grasp that.

You should really not waste your time on this board having discussions with fully manipulated bots/minions downing in naivete. You need to find a board where you can have enlightened discussion with the likes of John Stewart, Rachel Maddow, Brian"Always The Truth" Williams, and Chris Matthews. All of those folks speak the pure unadulterated truth and are more worthy of your presence than we ignorant rednecks. In that way, you can continue to convince one another that you actually won all of the many many many many many elections that you lost.

So you are telling me that everything I stated is not true and that I have been "manipulated" into believing it is the truth? Ok continue to believe that. Continue to believe that Hillary lost because of Comey, the Russians, yada yada yada. Continue to believe that I am a pawn of the right while you are totally pristine and uninfluenced by any outside source. Continue to believe that I accept everything Fox news puts out and you are above such activity. All of the above is otherwise know as dismissive condescending arrogance and, quite frankly, it is PRECISELY the reason the left lost the Presidential election and has been absolutely destroyed in the House, lost the senate, and has been blown away at the state levels. Of course, all of that is due to redistricting. I want to give you another thought that I , of course, have been "manipulated" into believing. When the average guy and his family sit down at the dinner table, they are NOT discussing the "value" of transgender bathrooms, the removal of the Confederate flag, and changing the names of the Redskins but rather "how am I going to afford my new higher healthcare costs with higher deductibles" and "why is this economy so weak( as documented by the federal reserve holding rates excessively low for a very long time) that I am unable to get a raise or find other employment"?

And there are lefties posing as Centrists on message boards.

You didnt come here to deceive anyone? Saying there was an opposing opinion on Michael Brown when there wasn't is not intentional deceit? Trying to suggest that Hillary Clinton saying Benghazi was spontaneous reaction to a video when she already told someone else it was a planned attack and then telling the families of those killed she would "get that video guy" is not intentional deceit? Saying your stimulus program would provide shovel ready jobs when it would not is not intentional deceit? If you like your health care plan, you can keep it is not intentional deceit? Stating that you found out about the Hillary email issue like everyone else did ( in the newspaper) when you corresponded with her on the server in question is not intentional deceit. I have more than "one thing" in my head and am ready to continue if you wish. And it is me who is being manipulated?

I guess the Dems did all of the redistricting then back in 2008?

Sort of like voting "present" 130 times in Illinois?

I guess that is why Mr. Obama chose Jeffrey Immelt as an advisor on business.

Then we hear that the Bush Administration provided faulty evidence. Surely the smartest woman in the world would have/could have seen through that.

[Hidden Content]

What impact did redistricting have on 13 Governorships, please?

Is that why, some time later, when the bodies arrived in the U.S. that Mrs. Clinton "assured" the bereaved parents that they were going to catch that guy who made the video?

Translation for Remmus- If you ask a question and expect a response, you should conduct yourself in a similar manner.

It leaves us wondering what percentage of the rest of your comments on this board are less than honest. Very surprising that one who believes in social justice, fairness and equity, would conduct himself in such a manner. If I am not mistaken, you were distributing the very "kool aid" for which you have much disdain. And you have already stated your concerns about our country being hypocritical. Does that apply to individuals also?

Hmmm- am beginning to wonder if we have lost our new " Centrist" and how long it will take for a new one to show up( with no relation, of course, to the prior two)

I understand that and didn't realize there were any ( get ready for the lefty word) "deniers" out there. But since he is socially conscious and believes the left is more so than the right, I wanted to be sure to pose this question in a pc manner and without any evidence of "Foxspeak". I am thinking this may require some research and, resultantly, I am sitting in my safe space with my play dough while patiently waiting to become "enlightened".

On one or two occasions, you have requested that I provide a "source" for my assertion. Now I would like to respectfully request the same of you. When I declared that the Michael Brown case in Ferguson was pretty much cut and dried regarding the "hands up, don't shoot assertion" you responded by suggesting that there was a report(s) that suggested otherwise. I personally think you simply said that without knowing there was this "alternate source". In the spirit of reciprocity, please supply me with the credible source that you claim existed validating your claim.

They also pay almost all of the taxes so I suggest to you that those ( and there are a very large number) who pay no federal income tax, benefit "disproportionately" from the redistribution.

Is this why the Dems lost 1000 state legislature seats, gave up 13 governorships and lost both the house and the Senate since Mr. Obama was elected. ( Hint- That's not kool aid info)

To me it is quite simple. If you want to have a productive prosperous economy, can that best be accomplished through the government or private enterprise? The last thing I want is a bunch of academicians trying to explain why their theory didnt work when there are plenty of productive enterprising workers/entrepreneurs who know precisely how to get the job done. By the way, the current administration adheres and reacts accordingly to the theory that the "haves" got their unfairly and at the expense of the "have nots". Sounds to me like you were, at one time, a "have not". Did you make yourself a "have" or was the government responsible? Oh, and by the way, I know how impressed you are with Hillary's educational resume. When you get a chance, take a look at Long Term Capital Managment, who almost totally toppled our economy- it was operated by several "Nobel Laureates" who were looked upon as "can't miss" as Hillary was looked upon as "can't miss" in the election.

Other than words/speeches, that commitment is evidenced in what manner?

And what is it,( other than words/speeches) that makes one a champion for the disenfranchised? Let me give you an alternate perspective: When one is wildly "successful" but makes some "bad decisions/actions" it casts a negative light on what and how that "success" was achieved.

And it confirms the fact that the goal should be equal opportunity rather than equal outcomes.

ECO

[Hidden Content]