stevenash

Because the Dems believe the "fair share theory" applies only to wealthy Americans and when it comes to taxes.

What kind of people try to force bakers to bake something that the baker does not want to bake?

The left believes that trickle down economics ( from the private sector) doesn't work, but is very confident that trickle down economics (from the government) works.

What a terrible thing to say!! Where is all that tolerance and civility your party preaches?

Sounds like a low information voter to me. Please let me know how Mr. Cheney single handedly authorized the war in Iraq. Yes, I am talking about the one that Mrs. Clinton voted for.

Thank you for such a relevant statement. Reagan would have beaten Bill. Another relevant statement.

And they are counting lawyers with private lawyering experience as business experience. Sorry, that wont work

Make sure you read to the bottom... An eye opener! (Or should be!) 1. California New Mexico Mississippi Alabama Illinois Kentucky Ohio New York Maine South Carolina These 11 States now have More People on Welfare than they do Employed!!! 2. Last month, the Senate Budget Committee reports that in fiscal year 2012, between food stamps, housing support, child care, Medicaid and other benefits, the average U.S. Household below the poverty line received $168.00 a day in government support. What's the problem with that much support? Well, the median household income in America is just over $50,000, which averages out to $137.13 a day. To put it another way, being on welfare now pays the equivalent of $30.00 an hour for 40 hour week, while the average job pays $24.00 an hour. 3. A recent "Investor's Business Daily" article provided statistics from a survey by the United Nations International Health Organization: Percentage (%) of men and women who survived a cancer five years after diagnosis: U.S. 65% England 46% Canada 42% % of patients diagnosed with diabetes -received treatment within 6 months: U.S. 93% England 15% Canada 43% % of seniors needing hip replacement who received it within six months: U.S. 90% England 15% Canada 43% % referred to a medical specialist who see one within one month: U.S. 77% England 40% Canada 43% Number of MRI scanners (a prime diagnostic tool) per million people: U.S. 71 England 14 Canada 18 % of seniors (65+), with low income, who are in "excellent health": U.S. 12% England 2% Canada 6% And now…for the last statistic: National Health Insurance? U.S. NO England YES Canada YES 4. Check the last set of statistics!! The percentage of each past president's cabinet... who had worked in the private business sector...prior to their appointment to the cabinet. You know what the private business sector is: a real-life business...not a government job. Here are the percentages. 38% T. Roosevelt 40% Taft 52% Wilson 49% Harding 48% Coolidge 42% Hoover 50% F. D. Roosevelt 50% Truman 57% Eisenhower 30% Kennedy 47% Johnson 53% Nixon 42% Ford 32% Carter 56% Reagan 51% GH Bush 39% Clinton 55% GW Bush 8% Obama This helps explain the bias, if not the incompetence, of this current administration: ONLY 8% of them...have ever worked in private business! That's right! Only eight percent---the least, by far, of the last 19 presidents! And these people are trying to tell our corporations how to run their business? How can the president of a major nation and society, the one with the most successful economic system in world history, stand and talk about business when he's never worked for one? Or about jobs when he has never really had one? And, when it's the same for 92% of his senior staff and closest advisers? They've spent most of their time in academia, government, and/or non-profit jobs or as "community organizers."

The "leadership", if you want to call it that.

Wouldn't you think that an RN would understand what someone 5'7" ought to weigh?

You don't have the foggiest idea of what I assume. I have an idea, particularly since you think you have some unique/superior research capabilities. Tally up all of the bombing/terror incidents ( you can choose whether you want it to be just the United States or world wide) and let me know what percentage of said incidents are not related to Islamic extremism. We both already know the answer but only one of us will acknowledge it.

Poor Nash, huh? 198 pounds for someone 5 foot 7 is considerably overweight. Try harder.

Can't do that. It is more important to not be perceived as xenophobic than it is to protect the lives of our citizens.

Thats the pot calling the kettle

Arent you amazed that an older overweight man was able to run down a sleek athletic 17 year old?

So he is white. Could easily have been radicalized by others or he is simply a nut job.

Guess its a matter of perspective. When I am not a direct participant in an event, I deal with things differently. I also did not salute or put my hand over my heart when I watched the bodies from Benghazi being unloaded from the airplane( yes, the time that Mrs. Clinton directly LIED to the parents of the slain) via television but you can rest assured I would have if I had been in their physical presence.

Just like Bill Clinton "did not have sex with that woman". Please show me where I made that statement and it is in the context to which you are trying to have everyone perceive it.

Should his past matter? One particular poster on this board seems confused about whether it does or does not.

Just heard that the shooting victim, did, in fact, have a gun and that his blood and fingerprints were both found on the gun.

You are an Islamophobe!!!!

I don't stand for anthem when I am home for a couple of reasons. I usually am not watching at that point in the game. Additionally, when I am at home and watching the game, I dont get out my umbrella if it is raining at the game sight. I also don't duck when I am watching rioters throw bricks when watching that activity on the television.

So two racist policies are better than one?

I have heard you make that statement many many times on this board. I have a gut feeling that unless you are in an actual situation, everything you say about what./how you would have done something is pure speculation.

The biggest con in the Presidential race is NOT Mr. Trump