Hmm- I was thinking that when I asked you a question you would answer. But, instead, you simply asked me another question. You wouldn't be avoiding the question, would you?
Big Girl- Do you think that the Perry indictment is legitimate and, at the same time, feel that the various complaints against Mr. Obama ( IRS, Benghazi, yada yada yada) are all just a bunch of phony scandals/witch
When you refer to "we" in your statement, are you referring to all of the lefties that participate on this board? If you are, I would suggest that, as a group, the left would be somewhat hypocritical in looking askance at the use of the English language by the right.
For the President to immediately return to the golf course following his announcement of the ISIS beheading of James Foley? For the President, the Vice President, and the Secretary of Defense to be absent from the funeral of Major General Harold Green?
I wonder if Mr. Obama still stands by his June statement that the world is more tranquil and peaceful than it has ever been. I also wonder if he still believes that telling the rest of the world that the U.S. had, in the past, been dismissive and arrogant ( aka the apology tour)was productive.
And it is a great system because the worker has the right to go somewhere else and seek a better situation instead of some bureaucrat telling you and the company how much you are to make, how many hours you are to work, and what your job description is.
I can see the difference. I also see sensationalism in one instance and virtual non recognition in the other. When you refer to the "armed white cop" it would appear that there was a chance that said cop was possibly on the verge of becoming the "unarmed white cop" and potentially being fired at(with his own gun) by the "armed crminal" (if the criminal had been successful at acquiring the policemans gun)
I know all of the facts have not been determinded in the Ferguson Missouri case. However, if we find out that the individual, did, in fact, assault the policeman and attempt to take possession/control of the policemans weapon, would we then be comparing apples to apples? I am assuming that both policemen have the same rights when it comes to defending themselves whether the threat is a gun or some sort of physical violence.