stevenash

no, thats only in the case of Obama

It's not as if the Dems dont already know everything they need to know about Trumps tax returns. Can you say Lois Lerner? It's not different than the " Muller Investigation" and the "quid pro quo" debacles. They knew there was nothing to either one of them( just like Supreme Court battle) but they also counted on fomenting a lot more hate and resentment with the hope of something turning up during all of the "investigations". The current "investigation" is a total sham. NOBODY has any direct evidence of quid pro quo ( or Bribery as the polls suggested was better understood). All statements have been nothing more than conclusions, many of which were third and fourth hand. My favorite part is most of the witnesses were asked "how they felt about various circumstances"

You, sir, MUST be an angry, greedy, white racist republican that doesnt care about others. How dare you believe in self responsibility?

Transparency is only required of the right. And, remember, that Mr. Obama assured us all that his was the most transparent administration in history. ( That ranks right up there with "shovel ready jobs" and "the Benghazi attack was caused by an internet video", and " Bowe Bergdahl served his country with honor and distinction")

It doesn't bother me. There are lots of things we don't know about Mr. Obama. Obvious double standard.

I have a close relative who is a school teacher ( yes, the little guy that was going to be protected by Obamacare.) Her premium tripled shortly after ACA was instituted.

And his college records were not available because?

If you are correct, did this happen only in the Trump election? How about the Obama election? How about the Bush election? How about the Clinton(Bill) election? Who was Ukraine trying to keep from getting elected?

Was this game played in H-town. If so, I wouldn't want to be driving through Huntington today.

UT Alum- do you believe that the government needs to be more involved in running the economy of this country or should they be minimally involved?

You are a very sophisticated stat analyst

The left believes that Mr. Carson is not sufficiently defiant, militant, and irascible.

Yea, sure. Thats why so many hostages in other countries have been freed during his Presidency.

[Hidden Content]

There will be no response from BG on this.

And the left has tried to impeach every elected Republican president since Eisenhower. Hmmm, I wonder why?

Adam Schiff has said virtually the same thing. Are you impressed with what the "witnesses" have had to say? You made such a big deal about Sondland. He offered nothing concrete- just another "interpretation" - and he did say Trump wanted nothing

Is your allegation any more credible than Russian Collusion and quid pro quo? If your allegation is correct, how does it compare to the adventures of Hunter Biden? What are your thoughts about the adventures Anthony Weiner and Elliot Spitzer?

And they are spewing communications majors

Yea, but you didn't see that "look" in his eye or the tone of his voice. They know what he "really meant" and, for that reason, he should be impeached.

Yes I heard Sondland. Still haven't heard anyone say that Trump directly stated what is alleged. As per Sondland" Trump never told me that aid was tied to announcement of investigations." Lots of opinions, assumptions, etc etc etc.

I heard all of that from the "experts", including Nate Silver, in 2016

You sound very confident. Is a Biden victory more assured than the Hillary victory?

Some believe that "right" = democrats and "wrong" = Republicans

Perhaps so. Please tell me which is acceptable and which is not.