-
Posts
5,120 -
Joined
-
Last visited
Everything posted by 82 5A State Champs
-
West Brook Qualifies for State in 7on7
82 5A State Champs replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="westend1" post="1019662" timestamp="1308580339"] [quote author=BMTJags link=topic=85059.msg1019660#msg1019660 date=1308580177] I'm not sold on anything 7 on 7. Put the pads on and show me something. [/quote] I agree. 7 0n 7 is just dressed up 2-below, but [b]it is encouraging to hear that Stump is throwing the ball well.[/b][/quote]This is quite the suprise. I hope I am wrong about him. -
West Brook Qualifies for State in 7on7
82 5A State Champs replied to WOSgrad's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Congrats to the Bruins. Good job, guys. -
[quote name="Scalp'em" post="1016478" timestamp="1307240934"] [quote author=89falcon link=topic=84736.msg1016460#msg1016460 date=1307237734] [quote author=BLUEDOVE3 link=topic=84736.msg1016282#msg1016282 date=1307156838] [quote author=I dont play well with Jaguars link=topic=84736.msg1016268#msg1016268 date=1307155089] If BMT had only 2 public schools they would be dominating IMO [/quote]I still can't understand why its not happening with ONLY 3 schools in Beaumont. I use to see the hs players working out with the college players when I first got to Beaumont. Don't see it anymore. [/quote] They never dominated when they had 2 high schools before. [/quote] in the late 80's to mid 90's WB did very well. WB in 91 was ranked 3rd in state. I too believe they should've stayed with two HS. The people in the pear orchard wanted old Hebert back, so they created Ozen to make people happy. Now, if they would let the coaches do thier thing at Ozen, they would win some games. Still think they did Lewis wrong. [/quote]The 1991 football season, WB was ranked as high as 4th, and as high as 5th the 1992 season.
-
[quote name="WBbear" post="1013685" timestamp="1306206201"] [quote author=Yeoj link=topic=84458.msg1013487#msg1013487 date=1306126388] [quote author=bobbymcgee link=topic=84458.msg1013390#msg1013390 date=1306090787] Who do you think should be the starting WB QB if not Stump? [/quote] J. Malone, #16 is the best QB in the program. Stump moved him to Wr as a soph to get him out the way of his son. West Brook's offense will be 80% run this season with lil Stump at QB. [/quote]J [b]Malone is a better QB...problem is you lose your best WR/Playmaker if you move him to QB...[/b]then what will Lil Stump do. Malone will take over only if the QB situation is just not working. [/quote]Having a good WR is irrelevant if he doesn't get the ball thrown to him. See what I'm getting at? It's easier to build an offense around a good QB, than it is around a good receiver.
-
[quote name="I dont play well with Jaguars" post="1013588" timestamp="1306174479"] [quote author=82 5A State Champs link=topic=84458.msg1013586#msg1013586 date=1306173937] [quote author=Yeoj link=topic=84458.msg1013487#msg1013487 date=1306126388] [quote author=bobbymcgee link=topic=84458.msg1013390#msg1013390 date=1306090787] Who do you think should be the starting WB QB if not Stump? [/quote] J. Malone, #16 is the best QB in the program. Stump moved him to Wr as a soph to get him out the way of his son. [b]West Brook's offense will be 80% run this season with lil Stump at QB.[/b][/quote]This was evident in the Tyler Lee game last year. I think the kid only threw three times. Where is WBbear during all this? Earlier this year he said there was going to be another kid calling signals. If you know something Bear, feel free to share it with us. If not, I see a long season in front of the Bruins this year. [/quote][b]I feel bad for lil stump when he has to run for his life when he faces Memorial.[/b] :D [/quote].....and Central, and Katy, and North Shore, and LaPorte, and........
-
[quote name="Yeoj" post="1013487" timestamp="1306126388"] [quote author=bobbymcgee link=topic=84458.msg1013390#msg1013390 date=1306090787] Who do you think should be the starting WB QB if not Stump? [/quote] J. Malone, #16 is the best QB in the program. Stump moved him to Wr as a soph to get him out the way of his son. [b]West Brook's offense will be 80% run this season with lil Stump at QB.[/b][/quote]This was evident in the Tyler Lee game last year. I think the kid only threw three times. Where is WBbear during all this? Earlier this year he said there was going to be another kid calling signals. If you know something Bear, feel free to share it with us. If not, I see a long season in front of the Bruins this year.
-
Weak Brooke info
82 5A State Champs replied to Mr. Buddy Garrity's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
2002 WB 7 PAM 56 2003 WB 10 PAM 30 2004 WB 0 PAM 28 2005 WB 47 PAM 27 2006 WB 56 PAM 41 2007 WB 42 PAM 21 2008 WB 26 PAM 0 2009 WB 13 PAM 7 2010 WB 49 PAM 13 WB leads the series 6-3.....and points scored 250-223. Enough said! You can definitely see when Stump arrived. 6-0 in that time. :) -
Nederland/PNG/Memorial vs. B.I.S.D
82 5A State Champs replied to ozenfreshman's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
[quote name="Scooter!" post="990847" timestamp="1301536361"] [quote author=WBbear link=topic=82297.msg990842#msg990842 date=1301535839] Who said anything about Stump? There is more than one QB on campus. [/quote]I doubt Stump doesnt start at QB. if not why wasnt this QB the real back up to Reyes last year? [/quote]I agree with THAT statement, scooter! I'd love to be suprised at who ends up playing QB next year. Stump will earn my utmost respect if he starts someone else over his son, for the sake of who gives us the best chance of winning. What I'm saying is, start the best person for the job.......not the person who is somehow "entitled" to the position. -
No, absolutely not. If he wasn't the highest paid, per capita, in the state this would not even be an issue. But the fact that he just got another raise with the possibility of educator/teacher layoffs looming in the future, seems to be a salty subject for some folks. It's definitely not perceived well, thats for sure.
-
R, if you'll re read my post, I said there were talks of laying off teachers in BISD. I didn't say it had happened. But look at it from a perception point of view. It wouldn't help BISD's image, as a whole, for a district with arguably the highest paid Sup in the state to begin laying off teachers because of a budget shortfall. Do you see where some people might have a bad taste in their mouth regarding this subject? Sorry, I'm just pointing out something I thought would be plainly obvious for folks to see.
-
The Vikings are a good fit for Bruce. He will do well up there.
-
Nederland/PNG/Memorial vs. B.I.S.D
82 5A State Champs replied to ozenfreshman's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Well, PN-G is 0-8 lifetime against West Brook. Nederland gave WB fits a few years ago, pre-Stump, but WB smoked them in Stumps first year. PAM is 0-5 against Stump in the last 5 years. What WB couldn't get done, Central and Ozen would surely be there to take care of the clean up. 'Nuff said! -
High School football game history
82 5A State Champs replied to SFA85's topic in SETXsports Archived Threads
Here is the 5A list. Not sure about the smaller classifications. [Hidden Content] -
[quote name="Popa Blu" post="982790" timestamp="1300157132"] This is not straightforward and some people that are putting out info don't have experience at reading blueprints. According to a committee member, one that helped form the bond, many were dead set against "anything athletic" (Butch stadium, New athlectic facilities, etc) So, instead of due diligence being placed on the specific "fieldhouse needs" this campus vs that campus, the line item of 1.6mil was placed in Bond, but all knew that many were opposed to "anything" athlectic so details were "not" looked at. Now in hindsight, we have on 1.6 predicated to accomplishing fairness (balance) what can not be accomplished at the WB campus. IMO the WB Fieldhouse needs about 2.5m to accomplish program needs. The 1.6, IMO, will accomplish Central's needs because the program is smaller. Sources say that the same people that wanted "nothing athletic" now want to discuss "the fieldhouse" in hindsight after a surplus has been announced. Last week we had a meeting and before leaving we called another one at WB tonight. You wanna know how many showed up. TWO counting me! I also have the dwgs, and I have been to the current facilities and counted toilets, urinals, showers, etc. IMO WB would not be well served to have the renovation plans set forth for 1.6m to be carried out. At this time, after the Bond has been approved, after we now are concerned about athletics, we need to move forward and attempt to present the case with solid evidence. The board has the right to do with the 10m what they want, like it or not. I suggest we present facts and let them speak for themselves. In the end I believe we can win the arguement. IMO the renovation to WB field house violates some code issues. I have a comparrison of every fieldhouse sq footage and contents, anyone is welcome to have it. [/quote]Very well said. It's very disappointing that WB doesn't have more support for it's student-athletes. They definitely, IMO, need a bigger, better, larger facility due to the numbers in the program. Coach Chip has been in that field house since WB opened in 1982. All you have to do is look at the team accomplishments on the ceiling beams in the locker room. Anyway, it's time for WB to get some of the same nice facilities that Ozen has. Admittedly, Ozen is definitely Thomas' darling. PopaBlu, next time they call a meeting, even though I dont have a kid at WB, let me know and i'll show up and give my support for the team and the program. Its time BISD put forth the money so WB and Central can step into the 21st century, from a facility standpoint.
-
[quote name="Sgt Rey" post="978272" timestamp="1299352873"] [quote author=sfa87 link=topic=80252.msg978126#msg978126 date=1299332872] Scooter stump will outcoach them clowns again like he always does, i wont b hitting that highway like i did last year, if we had stump, memorial wouldve won state with ease the bracket was set up 4 us. [/quote] I'd have to give it to Houston Memorial...they did a good job last year, [b]but Pearland by far had the best coaching/prep last year[/b][/quote]Yes they did. They were by far the best team we faced last season, and were well prepared for what WB brought to the table. They made us look bad. At first, I was hard on our coaching staff for not having us prepared for that game. But, we did as well as we could against Pearland. At the time, I didn't realize just how good Pearland was.
-
[quote name="Scooter!" post="973096" timestamp="1298738813"] Different ball game when you go to P.A. ;) [/quote]Scoot, can you say 0-7 against another Stump team? lol!
-
[quote name="Jackthehammer" post="968173" timestamp="1298044194"] So you think Lil Stump will lead you guys to the promise land? [/quote] :D