BMTSoulja1

I've never said that, but I do see the blatant target for BISD in a lot of y'all post. I understand a logical post based on logic, but just plain asinine posts aimed directlyas a detraction for a specific district or group of schools based on the past even when presented proof that it wasn't on the district is about as dimwitted a post as I've ever seen...

So you're saying that rules only apply to certain individuals and certain situations... ... And obviously certain school districts. ok. So in Vidor, the when they vandalized the a school a few years ago with graffiti, it was justified because of where it was and who did it, right? smh

I'm done with you... honestly. lmbo... don't worry... have fun at the upcoming anual spring football game...

Because I wanted someone, a WB guy or one of the others that know everything to answer... Truth be told, I knew about the situation minutes after my original post on this thread.

Lmbo!... And this isn't the same case? I'm dyin laughing... ok... I understand some though process. lmbo!

I knew that already... so, it was one of his own kids, probably suspected it. only coaches and players will frequent that area... How about, talking to the kid? talking to the parents? how about dismissing that kid from the team? but when you take the law into your own hands (cowboy vigilante), nothing good comes of it...

Lol... just what I thought... lol

Did you think the intelligible player a couple of months ago was BS too?

....media, Booster club presidents, sponsors, ect..

...it's written in black or white... so I guess if it happens in Nederland, then it's ok, right? ok...

So, you can take it in your own hands to do something clearly outside of policy because you feel like it's right? Isn't that like a person breaking the law feeling justified because of how he feels? Smh.

Was it one of his own players or one of his own staff?? That's a question that needs to be addressed. At the end of the day, someone did something he wasn't supposedvyo do, written in black and white... just sayin...

...And wasn't Nederland in the news.... TWICE?

...you're a Nederland guy... you really shouldn't say anything... especially if you have no clue, because obviously, you don't have a clue..

...you have no clue... And if your inside info is pegging BISD as the culprit, then you have bogus info...

Now when it don't happen like that, I don't want to hear any excuses and I don't want anyone to hide...

I've just obtained inside information. I'll put it like this... 'Just like I suspected'. I'll just let it play out but go ahead, go and bark and growl Monday.

Rob, what are you talking about? you have no idea if this is a BISD deal or something that Coach Flanigan did. I know you're upset about the past events that the district pulled, but this issue may be all on the coach.

Just automatically think that this is a BISD thing, huh? It DEFINITELY just couldn't be something that Coach Flannigan did.... smh. How about just wait until the facts come out...

...And that's not the only reason Kountze lost... They lost because they were too small and got several of their shots blocked and was out- rebounded... And had no one to check Dill...

You still gotta play the game.... at Central. You still only know how to play one way and one way only. Gotta be diverse. And Silsbee will STILL be at a size disadvantage vs. Central. So don't just go counting the chickens before they hatch...

Well, I was close... I said 28... it was actually 25...

You or anyone else haven't proven anything. Your logic in this case is pretty weak. You get a lot of money at the gate by making an OVERALL good tournament by bringing in several good teams, so the overal chances of weak teams making it far in the tournament is rare. You'll have strong contenders no matter what in a good tournament. In weak tournaments where you have several weak or mediocre teams and like 2 really strong teams, then you take your chances because the tournament probably isn't a high profile tournament. But you probably are hard wired to believe that ridiculous notion, so I'll stop debating... almost like arguing with the knuckleheads in the stands at Sulzberger football games that dogged the HC....

....smh. it's a valid point because if the best team is put against you in the first round, and you yourself is a good team, then you're probably going to win the consolation championship. a 2nd place finish and a consolation championship both finish with the SAME TOURNAMENT RECORD. BOTH considered a successful tournament run by almost every coach...

...And if you avoid a tournament because of a dumb belief that brackets are manipulated, then I question the toughness of your team AND the coaching... BTW, when the state tournaments are starting, and you face a great first round opponent, will the same gripes go on? ...And I know for a fact that the kids in Maroon and White could care less who they face or when or how. They just wanna play and dominate...