BMTSoulja1

The truth sometimes causes a mute response...

Black and white, he wasn't supposed to do it, there's NO gray area... You don't install cameras, then you're coaching your team in the playoffs...

Well, Thomas haven't been here for a few years now, so for whatever its worth, Ozen isn't the district's darling anymore, Man.

If he's truely a Kountze fan, then he really shouldn't be saying anything...

He sure talks about WO-S more than any other team and even refered to them as 'we', but whatever..

But this situation had nothing to do with anything faulty the district did. And also, there is a whole new regime in place from back then. educate yourself. There are sources available to help you with that.

Nope, that would be you and your AD that cost the kids a playoff spot...

Ignoramuses... even when the facts are here....

Lol... ok, I see... you're going with the latter no matter what... selective comprehension at its best... Mi Comprende.... gracias

So could that situation or other previous Vidor incidents in the local media be labeled as bad light under Vidor ISD. What about Nederland ISD? Lumberton ISD? All of them have recent situations that's happened within the last few years... No bad light?

So, you're a WO-S fan, huh? Will y'all keep it within 60 at both meetings vs. Silsbee? have WO-S basketball EVER beat Central ever in basketball?

Ok, so with that being said why is this about the district being the antagonists and not the actual person that made the dumb decision?

Not butthurt at all, just calling out stupidity , that's all. My point is that all of our area districts haven't been perfect, but leave it to most like you, anytime something pops off and BISD is mentioned, the BISD had just surfaces.. but when it happens elsewhere, it's rarely talked about... And what school do you support?

You'll agree with anything, I've learned as long as it have to do with anything BISD... You never addressed my post about Vidor...

I've never said that, but I do see the blatant target for BISD in a lot of y'all post. I understand a logical post based on logic, but just plain asinine posts aimed directlyas a detraction for a specific district or group of schools based on the past even when presented proof that it wasn't on the district is about as dimwitted a post as I've ever seen...

So you're saying that rules only apply to certain individuals and certain situations... ... And obviously certain school districts. ok. So in Vidor, the when they vandalized the a school a few years ago with graffiti, it was justified because of where it was and who did it, right? smh

I'm done with you... honestly. lmbo... don't worry... have fun at the upcoming anual spring football game...

Because I wanted someone, a WB guy or one of the others that know everything to answer... Truth be told, I knew about the situation minutes after my original post on this thread.

Lmbo!... And this isn't the same case? I'm dyin laughing... ok... I understand some though process. lmbo!

I knew that already... so, it was one of his own kids, probably suspected it. only coaches and players will frequent that area... How about, talking to the kid? talking to the parents? how about dismissing that kid from the team? but when you take the law into your own hands (cowboy vigilante), nothing good comes of it...

Lol... just what I thought... lol

Did you think the intelligible player a couple of months ago was BS too?

....media, Booster club presidents, sponsors, ect..

...it's written in black or white... so I guess if it happens in Nederland, then it's ok, right? ok...

So, you can take it in your own hands to do something clearly outside of policy because you feel like it's right? Isn't that like a person breaking the law feeling justified because of how he feels? Smh.