AggiesAreWe

And Lumberton calls us haters. goodsport you are anything but, "whiner". Even if Dayton was taken off the list it wouldn't make your team any better. I'm not hating. I think Dayton has a fantastic team and they will go long way if they stay healthy. I feel that people are missing the point that I am trying to make. So. Okay I give y'all win. bronco1 I've some of the stuff you put on here and had to wipe my screen off due to all the tears coming out. Tell me due you really think that Dayton is better than W.B. Please, enlighten us to your point. All you have done is ask questions, not state anything. "So. Okay I give y'all win" Figured. :

This was our best ever month for member registrations, 536!!!! We also set a record for most registrations in a week with 164. With this being the start of football season, I am very anxious to see where our membership goes from here. We could reach that 10,000 membership before the year is up. Exciting times here at Setxsports!!!! Thank you folks and tell your friends!!

I'm hearing ya LB, but to clear things up, Barbers Hill is 4A. It's just most folks on here just can't bring themselves to give Lumberton any respect. As for the polls on this site go, it's not run by the fans but by us Administrators. BTW, glad to see you over here. Hope you stay.

That would be interesting, but I don't think Jasper would want any part of Dayton. If Gilmer can hang 56 on the Dawgs, Dayton would hang at least 63.

Because we consider them in Southeast Texas, our site area. They have played in districts over here for years before. Should we no longer cover Jasper, Newton, Kirbyville, West Brook, and PAM because the majority of their districts are not covered by us? We said after the realignment that we would still cover these teams, including Dayton and Barbers Hill because of their close proximity and because of the many members we have here on the site from those schools. Is that a good enough answer? If not, too bad. Sorry, Mark, couldn't help myself. No! If you are going to answer my post smart al-eck then answer all the questions I asked. Thank You. Okay, here goes: 1. Barbers Hill 2. Because we consider them in our site area( explained this already ) 3. By how well or poor their results. 4. No 5. No 6. What gives? Hopefully everyone gives. 7. I'll let Bobcatfan4life explain since this is a direct question to him. ( but I'm pretty sure he agrees with me ) Just because Dayton only plays one team in our site area, doesn't mean we shouldn't include them. Jasper's district has no team in our area. Kirbyville and Newton, only two. West Brook and PAM, just each other according to YOU. If PAM or Jasper were to schedule teams in non district that were outside our site area, should we not cover them because of the fact that PAM would only play one team in our area and Jasper none? West Brook plays PAM, Ozen, and Central in their 10 game schedule. PAM, the same. By your way of thinking, after they play those teams, we should exclude them from the rankings because they will play teams outside our area? Jasper only plays 4, what about the other 6 games? These teams could have very easily not scheduled teams in our area in non district and left them with only one or no games against teams in our area. I believe last year PAM only had West Brook on their schedule from what YOU consider this area, we still covered them. By your reasonings, we would have to leave them out of our coverage. That's simply idiotic. Your reasonings seem personal not logical. It's quite obvious that you being a Lumberton fan, you have this disregard for Dayton.

Because we consider them in Southeast Texas, our site area. They have played in districts over here for years before. Should we no longer cover Jasper, Newton, Kirbyville, West Brook, and PAM because the majority of their districts are not covered by us? We said after the realignment that we would still cover these teams, including Dayton and Barbers Hill because of their close proximity and because of the many members we have here on the site from those schools. Is that a good enough answer? If not, too bad. Sorry, Mark, couldn't help myself.

The Beaumont Suprise is terrible. They give countless wrong info. I really wonder just how much research they really do. :

Silsbee's pass defense has to get better. But I think we will, Tigers take this one in a shootout, again.

Yes they are. Went 7-3 last year, just missing the playoffs. I believe they had about 13 starters back.

Final Waller 27 LaMarque 13

The two safeties were the difference. Tigers could have put it away, but fumbled deep in their own end of the field with less than 2 minutes left. Davis scored with just under a minute left. Tiger defense maybe their achilles heel this year. We'll see.

Garrett had over 300 yards rushing.

Not me. I predicted a low scoring game. Both defenses are these teams strength.

Davis gets another safety due to snap over the punter's head Silsbee 34 Davis 32 4 minutes left

4:11 left in 3rd Silsbee 27 Davis 23

I haven't gotten any updates because my wife won't answer the phone. She is at the game, I am at work. > Right, we played H. Sterling, this the first year to play Davis.

Halftime Bmt Central 7 PAM 0

Mustangs score again, missed 2 point WOS 12 Ned 7 9:21 left in 2nd

WOS scores, misses PAT WOS 6 Ned 7

Davis got a safety.

2:27 left in first Silsbee 7 Hou. Davis 9

Nederland touchdown!! Bellows to Cardenas WOS 0 Ned 7 3:31 left in first

PNG scores PNG 7 BH 7

How come the game is not on the radio. The only thing that is playing is music. What radio are you talking about? It's on 92.5 fm and there is a link in this thread that you can listen from.

Barbers Hill scores early after PNG turnover. BH 7 PNG 0