AggiesAreWe

[Hidden Content] Coverage area teams in this week's rankings: 6A #2 North Shore #7 Atascocita #10 Summer Creek 5A DI #4 PA Memorial 5A DII #5 Port Neches-Groves 4A DII #2 Silsbee #7 Hamshire-Fannett 3A DII #5 Newton 2A DI #1 Timpson #9 Garrison 2A DII #7 Lovelady

I blame this loss squarely on my daughters shoulders. She was supposed to come over and sit in driveway with me, drink some beer and listen to the game. She chose to stay home and watch it from her bed. Freakin lazy ass.

Correction on these stats. Moshier only passed 4 times (3-4) for 160 yards and 2 TD's, all in the 1st quarter. Silsbee rushed 33 times for 322 yards and 5 TD's.

Silsbee held WO-S to just 41 rushing yards on 22 plays. 2 yard average. Turner had 27 yards on 12 carries. Mustangs threw for 119 on 26 attempts. Total offense for WO-S was 160 yards on 48 plays. 3.33 yards per play. Silsbee had a total of 302 yards of offense (191 passing, 111 rushing)

can't watch, have to listen. part of the mojo

I'm sitting in my driveway with the radio on. Got to keep the mojo going.

My post came straight from the TEA website that lists all the school districts racial makeup. It's the one that counts with the government when it comes to funding. I have no clue as to what percentage of the sports teams are currently.

Just for accuracy, West Orange Cove ISD has a 54.1% African-American enrollment. Not the 99.9% that was posted a few posts ago. [Hidden Content]

I go 7-3 in my last 10 plays ($50 a play) USC +2.5 at Notre Dame L -55 Louisville/Pitt over 44.5 W +50 North Carolina -3 W +50 Auburn/LSU over 60 W +50 Mizzou +2.5 at Kentucky W +50 Mizz/Kentucky over 50.5 W +50 Duke -3 W +50 UCLA +3.5 at Oregon State L -55 In bold a 4 bet parlay W +250 Lost a parlay -55 Finished the day 11-5-1 +475

I get that. I just point out that there are other teams to consider. Sometimes I think some of our members completely disregard what our coverage area is when it comes to ranking teams. I just have a different mindset when it comes to rankings and this website. Had to be this way when we actually did the rankings for many years.

So, is it being suggested that this site narrow it's coverage?

Break it down 6A/5A/4A top 10 3A/2A/1A/Private top 10

!!:67/13/F

No argument with that statement.

!!:67/13/4

!!:60/13/4

!!:44/13/3

Me neither

Just so I understand this argument, @TxHoops is wanting the current admin/coaching staff at WO-S to fail. @SmashMouth states that taking that stance would also be against the current players as well. Is this an accurate assessment?

!!:94/50/F

!!:37/13/H

!!:37/13/2

!!:30/13/2 4:17 2Q

!!:23/13/2

That's what I read online just a few minutes ago.