Jump to content

AggiesAreWe

SETXsports Director/Manager
  • Posts

    88,485
  • Joined

  • Last visited

  • Days Won

    631

Everything posted by AggiesAreWe

  1. I agree about the opt up. It should only be for schools with major travel issues. (i.e. El Paso, etc.) Not for schools that are are only traveling 60 or less miles. BC, HJ and Liberty all opted up for competition reasons. Not travel. You'll never convince me otherwise. I can see BC opting up because they are actually very close to DI numbers anyway. HJ and Liberty are not even close. Also, I am not all that hip on all the other sports going to divisions but if that is how it's going to be, then have divisional districts like football and not decide the divisions after district play. That actually allows a larger school to get in D2 depending on who makes playoffs. If they do go with divisional districts this next realignment for all sports (I am hearing they won't) then schools that opt up for football should have to play all the rest of their sports in that football district. You shouldn't be able to pick and choose what sport you want to opt up in and not.
  2. Goes to positive points. I believe this district point cap is 21. Based on the one result (LC beat Dayton, 50-26) we already have, these are the current point totals for those three teams: Lake Creek +21 West Fork 0 Dayton -21 With 2 more results to be determined, those point totals will change. Let's say Dayton beats WF by 17, then they will finish with a point total of -4. WF would current be at -17. Then let's say WF beats LC by 7. Then WF would finish at -10 and LC would finish at +14. So with those results, LC would be #3 seed, Dayton #4 seed and WF out. But, I do not know if this is one of those districts that only uses positive points just to break three way then go head to head with remaining two teams. If that was the case, the seeds would still be the same with the example scenario that I posted. Of course, those two games yet to be played could change the point totals quite a bit from my example. Only thing for sure we know is the current point totals for Dayton and Lake Creek.
  3. DCTF has Orangefield as a 4 point favorite.
  4. DCTF has Lumberton as a 15 point favorite.
  5. I stay away from Tues-Thurs. college games. Every now and then play some Friday games when they are lumped in on my high school ticket.
  6. I watched the Texan Live broadcast Sunday. Tigers had a very difficult time tackling Jefferson. Had him bottled up several times but he powered through the tackles.
  7. DCTF has Angleton as a 6 point favorite. Stepp has LP by 5. He mentions the loss of the Angleton QB.
  8. I know Silsbee as a team had 229 yards rushing in the game.
  9. Have not seen his numbers other than passing. 9-15, 87 yards, 2 TD's.
  10. Can't imagine any bigger. DCTF had Silsbee a 67 point favorite against Tarkington. Silsbee won 63-6. Was up 56-0 at half. Running clock in 2nd Q and all of 2nd half.
  11. 1. Kingwood at Summer Creek 2. North Shore at CE King 3. Lufkin at Beaumont United 4. West Brook at Galveston Ball 5. Angleton at La Porte 6. Porter at Crosby 7. Nederland at Huntsville 8. Port Neches-Groves at Montgomery 9. West Fork at Dayton 10. Huffman at LC-M 11. Lumberton at Livingston 12. Vidor at Hardin Jefferson 13. Jasper at Silsbee 14. Shepherd at Hamshire Fannett 15. Kirbyville at Buna 16. Orangefield at East Chambers 17. Diboll at Crockett 18. Fairfield at Palestine Westwood 19. Huntington at Teague 20. Kountze at New Waverly 21. Trinity at Anderson-Shiro 22. Joaquin at Shelbyville 23. Timpson at Garrison 24. Evadale at Colmesneil 25. Burkeville at Chester
  12. DCTF has Silsbee as a 33 point favorite.
  13. DCTF has WO-S as a 70 point favorite.
  14. DCTF has Huntsville as a 16 point favorite.
  15. DCTF has Hardin as a 44 point favorite.
  16. DCTF has LC-M as a 5 point favorite.
  17. Jefferson had 26 carries for 256 yards.
  18. I guess EC has no chance of beating Orangefield. Might as well not play the game this Friday. Please let me know soon. I was thinking about coming to that game.
  19. I tend to agree. If you use points as a tiebreaker, then use it all the way through. Most districts do this but there are some that use points to break three way then head to head for the remaining two teams.
  20. I have PN-G, 34-21
  21. Computer line comes out on Tuesdays.
  22. There is a cap on the points. It's 18 for 10-4A DI. So a team could beat a team by 40, but it would only count as +18 for the tiebreaker. So how would you determine a three way tie if it's not by points?
  23. Denied. Neither are opting up. In fact, from what I hear, WO-S could possibly be close to 3A DI numbers. I don't think they will drop.
  24. Two tie is head to head. Three way goes to positive points in the games played between the three teams. 10-4A DI has a positive point max of 18. Example, if team A beat team B by 14 points, but lost to team C by 7, then team A would be +7 in points. Team B beat team C by 14 points, team B would be 0 points. Team C would be -7 points. Therefore team A would be #1 seed, team B #2 seed, team C #3 seed. But, some districts only use this system to break three way tie. Once it's broken to determine top seed, then it goes to head to head for the remaining two teams. Not sure if 10-4A DI does the tiebreaker in that manner.
×
×
  • Create New...