Razor

No whining here...I could give a rat's you know what less about how many "smites" or whatever I have...I find it funny that someone got their feathers ruffled enough to go to the trouble of dishing out smites when they mean absolutley nothing

8)...apparently I hurt someone's feelings...lol

lol...it really is funny...I think anyone who questioned anything about the big scoop AAW talked about before the internet show was given a load of smites...I got like 400 of 'em last night

i think your school will continue to grow and moving up won't be an issue

BG, they lead the nation in that category

i will give SC a pass on that one...I don't know that you could expect them to do much more with a 3 year history...program is off to a good start and I suspect they will continue to grow and be competetive in the new 6A ranks after next realignmnt

that sticker would not work in the first round of the playoffs

[quote name="bigdog" post="1330175" timestamp="1352905979"] [quote author=Razor link=topic=106259.msg1330167#msg1330167 date=1352905555] anyone calling out and criticizing kids by name has issues IMO...you gotta remember that these are young men and women who put alot of time and effort into being their best...the fact that they do what they  do gives us an opportunity to come on here and talk about the games...as adults, we should be able to do that without bashing kids [/quote] mine too On the other hand,  calling them out for praise is just fine in my opinion. [/quote]

again, despite what happened to Dayton last week, I look for them to rebound and play well...the scrimmage result, while not totally useless, is pretty close to useless...IMO, one of Nederland's biggest assets lies in our coaches ability to gameplan and make adjustments...they do none of this for scrimmages...add to this the fact that Nederland started the game without 3 defensive starters and ended up playing most of the scrimmage without as many as 6 defensive starters, and you understand why the scrimmage doesn't worry me at all. all that said, I do see a physical, closely contested game with Nederland winning 27-20...the Dogs are playing pretty well right now and are for the most part, fairly healthy for this time of year...more so than this time last season...again don't underestimate the value of Nederland's coaching staff actually game planning for this game...they have proven to be really good at it

anyone calling out and criticizing kids by name has issues IMO...you gotttta remember that these are young men and women who put alot of time and effort into being their best...the fact thatt they do what they  do gives us an opportunity to come on here and talk about the games...as adults, we should be able to do that without bashing kids

I don't care either buddy, but someone is obviously doing something...I had 95 smites in several years and now am up to 462 in the last 2 hours????  Same with some other posters who made comments about the so called "big news"...as Keyshawn would say, c'mon man...lol

6-4 and 245...wow!

I seriously look for Dayton to have a better showing....expecting a good game but I will save my prediction for tomorrow

How dare you...this is really funny but I could honestly care less...let's talk football

Still gotcha beat bro...mine jumped negative 200 more after I commented the first time...interesting

i won't lose sleep over it...lol

i must have really agitated aaw by criticizing his big scoop...my negative karma went from 95 to 229 in less than an hour...wow...lol

the so called big scoop was that Dayton lost the game somewhat on purpose so they would draw Nederland...makes sense, huh?

but hey, congrats AAW...you got what you wanted by having more people listen to the show...albeit for what is a ridiculous "scoop"...I am sure many of us will remember that the next tiime you say you have soome "breaking news"

that's what a team who gets their butt kicked says...if Dayton did lose on purpose, that says alot about them and it ain't good...first of all, that is ludicrous...nobody worth their salt loses a district championship game..."strategic loss" is the absolute dumbest thing I have ever heard

[quote name="ABSENT!" post="1329598" timestamp="1352847196"] I am glad you revealed yourself WR84...  It has been quite evident over the past three years that Central had a pro-style quarter back, yet the coaching stafff forced him to play in the spread.  Why is that?  Especially when Central did not have the o-line to run a spread attack. Establish the run down hill, run the bootleg, and play action pass.  It jus seemed from my "untrained eye" though Mitchell was fast he wasn't laterally quick and the O-line wasn't great, why put him in those bad situations? [/quote] well, this is headed south...how about them Bulldogs?

Well, pride, I have to give you +1 for what is an overly objective view of your team...while I understand your concerns, I know what type of talent Dayton has and what their potential is...I will just have to assume that they will play to that potential and therefore be a dangerous team...if they do not, then I will consider myself pleasantly surprised...I really do look for them to rebound and play better than they have been...I said before on this or maybe another thread, fans tend to overreact after a blowout game like the SC/Dayton game last week, in both directions...truth is, SC probably isn't as good as they looked last Friday (I am sure they are good, but if they are as good as everyone is saying after last Friday, they need to be in the SEC West) and Dayton probably isn't as bad as they looked Friday...you gotta remember that these are teenage boys we are talking abut here and anything can happen on game day/night

[quote name="DemDAWGS!" post="1328506" timestamp="1352755901"] 85' HUSKER --> we love all our haters.  We'll have some more haters after this Friday. Just don't understand the hate ...The Dawgs made themselves so easy to LOVE. [/quote] you have haters because many of your posters on here are obnoxious

I thought SC was going to be in the SEC next year???

exactly...stats are only valuable if you look at all of them, not just a select few like you did earlier