SmashMouth

I only said "mostly legal" because if there is not enough separation between blocks, it can be perceived (especially by a low paid high school ref) as a chop block - even though it is not. A cut block within in the tackles is definitely legal. It's just a high block by player A - a moment of separation, then a cut block by player B. It's an excellent combo especially on a backside pass block.

Splendora?

Yep. It comes with the territory. A true chop block is usually a high-low block from 2 offensive players on a defender at the same time. The way around that call is to initiate the high block then disengage and separate. Within a blink of an eye, the low guy makes his block and takes out the defender. If the guard / tackle practice it, it is pure art and "mostly legal".

How does karma bite one in the butt? What is your experience?

Good one…

Sure as hell is. It’s called survival. Have you ever gone over the speed limit? Even just a little? And people die in car crashes every day. As an offensive lineman, I taught him how to hold without getting caught. I don’t know if anyone was ever killed from being held by an offensive lineman. But if you know ANYTHING about football, you know this happens on every play. It’s one of the most common penalties on every level of the game. You’re obviously not a football guy, so I invite you to go spew your stupidity somewhere else.

Plus I think the Muslim cheerleaders are really limited by their uniforms.

Who is “they”? Besides, it’s not playing dirty til you get caught. I taught my kid every trick I knew and then some.

Nah, he’s just some tool that always wanted to be something but couldn’t, so he talks about everyone else. He doesn’t understand how the slot t works either.

Do you know what a “tool” is?

Look, don’t confuse this yahoo with somebody from Lumberton.

Thank you.

Nice save attempt. Lol. But he never said it once in the movie. You confused him with Clevon Little. Lol. Although Richard Pryor was one of the many writers, Richard Pryor did not write most of the racial lines in that movie. Pryor’s main focus was the character Mongo according to Mel Brooks. Pryor WAS used as the “license” to use all the racial slurs though. Brooks figured that if Pryor was a part of the movie (he was actually offered the main role by Brooks, but Warner Bros didn’t want someone with such little screen experience), he could get away with a lot more. In recent documentaries about both himself and Richard Pryor, Mel Brooks said, “Pryor wrote the Jewish jokes, the Jews wrote the black jokes.” In other words, it wasn’t a matter of who wrote what, because it wasn’t meant to be harmful or derogatory. And THAT is my point.

Waiving HIPAA

Lol. You’re right.

Lol. I get so excited about my smart ace post, I usually forget to proofread. Lol.

Amen on that!

That's interesting... Thought for sure he would have chosen Huffman & Livingston! 😎

Another misspelling... 🤣

That's "Cracka" with a soft a

Btw, Richard Pryor wasn't in Blazing Saddles...it was Cleavon Little. So you're saying they all look alike???

And it's not the same type of logic. One is done out of meanness...

Thank you...

Apples & Oranges friend. A young man dressing up as Madea is WAYYYYYYY different than calling a black person a derogatory slur. More like a Kiwi fruit & a tricycle... not even in the ball park.

Maybe we should cancel Cheech & Chong because it's offensive to dope smokers.