SmashMouth

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1074298" timestamp="1317850983"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074251#msg1074251 date=1317848055] [quote author=dogfather link=topic=89311.msg1074243#msg1074243 date=1317847276] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143] Potential 1st Rnd Matchups: GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B [/quote]Yall will not be picking Lum-R over white after PN-g Rolls threw lumbreton (plays all their kids for 2 full quarters) Sorry red ! No ofense .......They will roll -Here's the deal every time I have seen BMT play someone I have not really seen them pull off their dogs. Do to them not having a winning season in past yrs. They are ready for redemption! Understandable! But here is the Kicker PN-G is running it up not even trying. I know some of those kids over there. They are running away with it - with kids that will never touch the ball again Linemen 3rd&4th stringers. THEY ARE DEEP THEY WILL WIN SUPER BOWL !!!!The Dogfather said it first remember that. PEEWEE FANS and FANS OF ALL! Good work, now keep going. Bmt G beats Bmt G Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick) Png G beats Png W WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick) [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder. [/quote] [/quote] I can see PNG G taking it all...what I was asking was the 1st round projected matchup of Lum R and Lum W.  White would appear to be the favorite... [/quote]This dude has jokes. We never call the dogs off. PLZ, we have Mercy Ruled every team we've played. Including the teams that are currently in the Top 5 power rankings Some by half-time, others a lil later. Can PNG G say that. Y'all put up 15 against P.A, OF did that. And every other team y'all played gives up 40 to everybody. I bet those 3rd & 4th stringers wont be touching the ball vs Wos and Lum R. And I guarantee you they wont be against us ;) [/quote] To be fair, it is my understanding you never had to take your backfield out of the game against Lum R.  Bmt G scored and up by 28, then Lum R got the last possession and the game ended.  Still whipped em though.

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1074261" timestamp="1317848758"] [quote author=demons95 link=topic=89140.msg1074240#msg1074240 date=1317847060] #3 scored all offensive touchdowns except one that I can remember and he is 8.  You are right I have no affiliation with pee-wee white.  Both of my kids have been fortunate enough to play for Chris and he's a buddy of mine.  He has plenty of good coaches to help him.  I understand what your saying but day in day out he puts together winning teams and believe me they played fast kids last year.  Guess what that got them?  A big ol Undefeated Super Bowl CHAMPIONSHIP trophy.  I know what you're gonna say BMT-G kids are phenoms unlike any other kid we've ever seen.  Until these kids start showing up on Marvel comic books they are still kids and not super heros. [/quote]Obviously you didn't watch the game. #3 had all the touchdowns :D He only had 1 dude. Yes he's 8 but he was 7 when the season started  ;) [/quote] Demons95 just talking smack to keep his mind off of losing...lol.

[quote name="baddog" post="1074253" timestamp="1317848258"] You can take that and run with it....it's cool. You know what I meant. Women at the gossip fence........ [/quote] It's all good...

[quote name="dogfather" post="1074243" timestamp="1317847276"] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143] Potential 1st Rnd Matchups: GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B [/quote]Yall will not be picking Lum-R over white after PN-g Rolls threw lumbreton (plays all their kids for 2 full quarters) Sorry red ! No ofense .......They will roll -Here's the deal every time I have seen BMT play someone I have not really seen them pull off their dogs. Do to them not having a winning season in past yrs. They are ready for redemption! Understandable! But here is the Kicker PN-G is running it up not even trying. I know some of those kids over there. They are running away with it - with kids that will never touch the ball again Linemen 3rd&4th stringers. THEY ARE DEEP THEY WILL WIN SUPER BOWL !!!!The Dogfather said it first remember that. PEEWEE FANS and FANS OF ALL! Good work, now keep going. Bmt G beats Bmt G Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick) Png G beats Png W WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick) [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder. [/quote] [/quote] I can see PNG G taking it all...what I was asking was the 1st round projected matchup of Lum R and Lum W.  White would appear to be the favorite...

[quote name="demons95" post="1074240" timestamp="1317847060"] #3 scored all offensive touchdowns except one that I can remember and he is 8.  You are right I have no affiliation with pee-wee white.  Both of my kids have been fortunate enough to play for Chris and he's a buddy of mine.  He has plenty of good coaches to help him.  I understand what your saying but day in day out he puts together winning teams and believe me they played fast kids last year.  Guess what that got them?  A big ol Undefeated Super Bowl CHAMPIONSHIP trophy.  I know what you're gonna say BMT-G kids are phenoms unlike any other kid we've ever seen.  Until these kids start showing up on Marvel comic books they are still kids and not super heros. [/quote] Awesome kids (you left off the awesome part). Well the Ned B and Lum R head coaches will tell you what kind of team Bmt G is...and they have good teams too.  I understand your kid plays on Lum W, and I also agree that Olexa has a helluva coaching skill and great group of boys...I also know that if you underestimate Bmt G, you'll be talking about the 2010 Trophy next year too (cuz there won't be one in 2011)!  Good luck and stay healthy.

[quote name="baddog" post="1074239" timestamp="1317846785"] Can we leave these kids alone now? 11 pages GEEEEEEZ, what busybodies. Worse than women [/quote] I agree.  My issue isn't with the kids, but with un intelligible posts...and just to stir the pot, "is there something wrong with women?" (OK ladies, this is your cue...lol).

[quote name="AggiesAreWe" post="1074230" timestamp="1317845372"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074225#msg1074225 date=1317845050] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1074212#msg1074212 date=1317844265] Yes I did. And that probably came off wrong. I was basing that on a 6 week (original) punishment, in which the season would be over. Hence, the rest of the season. And you are correct, I hate football as much as you like drunken kids on campus.....now who is sounding rediculus? ::) [/quote] You are still... Who said (other than a message board and rumor mill) that the punishment was 6 weeks?  Do you know for a fact that all involved were in trouble to the same degree?  Is there a chance that some of what you are considering to be fact is merely heresay? I think the kids were wrong.  I think they should be punished.  I think that crucifying them and all other athletes (as you appear to want per your postings) is wrong. [/quote] It was confirmed to me by people "in the know" that it was 30 day suspensions. School suspensions (at least from my personal knowledge) are counted by school days, do not include weekends. In this case, this is well short of the "30" days. But, there could be a valid reason for the suspension being cut short. [/quote] Certainly possible, but then again, you are not out on a witch hunt for wayward athletes... 58SHW doesn't seem to realize that athletics are a positive influence in MANY young men and young ladies lives.

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074212" timestamp="1317844265"] Yes I did. And that probably came off wrong. I was basing that on a 6 week (original) punishment, in which the season would be over. Hence, the rest of the season. And you are correct, I hate football as much as you like drunken kids on campus.....now who is sounding rediculus? ::) [/quote] You are still... Who said (other than a message board and rumor mill) that the punishment was 6 weeks?  Do you know for a fact that all involved were in trouble to the same degree?  Is there a chance that some of what you are considering to be fact is merely heresay? I think the kids were wrong.  I think they should be punished.  I think that crucifying them and all other athletes (as you appear to want per your postings) is wrong.

[quote name="demons95" post="1074203" timestamp="1317843727"] Maybe ya'll are right but there are still a few games left to be played before then.  I don't personally coach pee-wee but I would be willing to bet Chris will have the kids ready to play.  They may not win but from start to finish those boys will be ready to play.  By the way we have very little speed on Senior White this year and have shut down several speedy players so you can stop speed and can coach to stop it as well.  Good luck to all you 7 yr old bandwagon riders and may your odds hit.  I'm sure a few of ya'll have gambled on this. HA HA [/quote] I have no doubt they will be ready to play!  What's amazing about these Bmt G boys is that the better players on their team ARE only 7...amazing.  Demons95, are you telling me right now that you have NO coaching affiliation with Lum W???

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074198" timestamp="1317843566"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074189#msg1074189 date=1317843134] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1074180#msg1074180 date=1317842616] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074175#msg1074175 date=1317842307] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1074171#msg1074171 date=1317842223] [quote author=the sports guy link=topic=88772.msg1074164#msg1074164 date=1317841910] If you think it doesnt happen in your neck of the woods....your wrong.  Suspended not suspended, in trouble for this one but not that one.....it happens everywhere.  [b]It doesnt matter[/b].  It happens now and will continue to happen. Its life.  Get over it.  I have seen worse.  I am sure everyone else has seen worse. [/quote] I agree, (except with the the "it doesn't matter part") hence my comment "but its ok, because everyone else is doing it" AND, just because there are worse crimes (or mistakes) shouldnt mean we negate the lesser ones to meaningless all together. [/quote] Answer this, please...What do you think a fair punishment would be for the boys in Nederland who got into trouble? [/quote] For starters, equal to all involved (since it's being stated that it isnt) second, being they either had alcohol (which is considered a drug) on campus or under the influence while on campus (and that it is against federal law to do so) Id expect at least a season suspension, not a game or two. [/quote] If some were not athletes, then what do you do to the non-athlete...since we're keeping it equal and everything?  Kinda blows your so-called "equal" punishment out of the water. [/quote] No it doesn't....depending on the severity of the offense. They either serve equal time in in school suspenion, or off campus suspension...PERIOD! And, I looked up the FEDERAL LAW, and alcohol is listed as as drug as it pertains to the Drug-Free School Zone, which includes up to 1000' of any property utilized by the school. [/quote] But you said the athletes should be prohibited from participating in football for the rest of the season...Since we are being equal, why are you basing punishment periods on football season.  Sounds to me like someone here is a football hater more and more.

[quote name="pngfan97" post="1074187" timestamp="1317842904"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074169#msg1074169 date=1317842179] [quote author=pngfan97 link=topic=89311.msg1074165#msg1074165 date=1317841943] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074159#msg1074159 date=1317841374] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143] Potential 1st Rnd Matchups: GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B [/quote] Good work, now keep going. Bmt G beats Bmt G Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick) Png G beats Png W WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick) [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder. [/quote] LOL...good one.  What about WOS vs Ned B [/quote] WOS [/quote] I agree 100%...don't know about the 2 Lum teams though.  Both are good...but 1 is 4-2 and 1 is 6-0...should be the answer righ there.  Whatcha think? [/quote] IMO, I think this is a toss up.  Lum W barely got by Ned B, and other than that their schedule has been pretty easy.  Lum R lost to two very good teams in Bmt G and WOS.  Bmt G handled Ned B like they did Lum R, and it may come down to who has had more tests in the regular season.  If that is the case, I'm going with Lum R. [color=red][b] Plus they hit harder[/b][/color]. [/quote] Good analysis...and I get your "hit harder" comment. Lol.

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074180" timestamp="1317842616"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074175#msg1074175 date=1317842307] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1074171#msg1074171 date=1317842223] [quote author=the sports guy link=topic=88772.msg1074164#msg1074164 date=1317841910] If you think it doesnt happen in your neck of the woods....your wrong.  Suspended not suspended, in trouble for this one but not that one.....it happens everywhere.  [b]It doesnt matter[/b].  It happens now and will continue to happen. Its life.  Get over it.  I have seen worse.  I am sure everyone else has seen worse. [/quote] I agree, (except with the the "it doesn't matter part") hence my comment "but its ok, because everyone else is doing it" AND, just because there are worse crimes (or mistakes) shouldnt mean we negate the lesser ones to meaningless all together. [/quote] Answer this, please...What do you think a fair punishment would be for the boys in Nederland who got into trouble? [/quote] For starters, equal to all involved (since it's being stated that it isnt) second, being they either had alcohol (which is considered a drug) on campus or under the influence while on campus (and that it is against federal law to do so) Id expect at least a season suspension, not a game or two. [/quote] If some were not athletes, then what do you do to the non-athlete...since we're keeping it equal and everything?  Kinda blows your so-called "equal" punishment out of the water.

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074171" timestamp="1317842223"] [quote author=the sports guy link=topic=88772.msg1074164#msg1074164 date=1317841910] If you think it doesnt happen in your neck of the woods....your wrong.  Suspended not suspended, in trouble for this one but not that one.....it happens everywhere.  [b]It doesnt matter[/b].  It happens now and will continue to happen. Its life.  Get over it.  I have seen worse.  I am sure everyone else has seen worse. [/quote] I agree, (except with the the "it doesn't matter part") hence my comment "but its ok, because everyone else is doing it" AND, just because there are worse crimes (or mistakes) shouldnt mean we negate the lesser ones to meaningless all together. [/quote] Answer this, please...What do you think a fair punishment would be for the boys in Nederland who got into trouble?

[quote name="pngfan97" post="1074165" timestamp="1317841943"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1074159#msg1074159 date=1317841374] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1074114#msg1074114 date=1317837992] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143] Potential 1st Rnd Matchups: GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B [/quote] Good work, now keep going. Bmt G beats Bmt G Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick) Png G beats Png W WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick) [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder. [/quote] LOL...good one.  What about WOS vs Ned B [/quote] WOS [/quote] I agree 100%...don't know about the 2 Lum teams though.  Both are good...but 1 is 4-2 and 1 is 6-0...should be the answer righ there.  Whatcha think?

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074163" timestamp="1317841779"] [quote author=dawg-lover link=topic=88772.msg1074158#msg1074158 date=1317841334] Isn't that the truth?! lol But, all of these kids are athletes. Just not "football players". [/quote] Ah look, here is one that understands! Maybe so, and if we were in THAT season, then they would be getting released. [/quote] So much for being "OUT"... I bid you a good day and the hope for a better (and more intelligent) tomorrow.

[quote name="Knoddy1" post="1074139" timestamp="1317839727"] I think I remember reading that the exact punishment for the two Ned boys would be re-evaluated after additional information was gathered, and this was before the Vidor game. obviously with their reinstatement that was done, I do not know or have knowledge of that information, and some of the Judges on this thread don't either.  Just a little info for 58shu if  the guys reinstatement was because of our opponent, then it would have happened last week before we played PN G...that was a bigger game for the dogs than this week [size=18pt][u][b]and if you don't know that then you are truly clueless[/b][/u][/size]. [/quote] 58SHU is TRULY clueless!

[quote name="DawgsOfGold" post="1074114" timestamp="1317837992"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89311.msg1073940#msg1073940 date=1317825807] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89311.msg1073931#msg1073931 date=1317825143] Potential 1st Rnd Matchups: GAME 1: #1BMT G vs #4 Bmt B Game 2. #2 Lum W vs #3 Lum R Game 3. #1 Png G vs #4 Png W Game 4. #2 Wos vs #3 Ned B [/quote] Good work, now keep going. Bmt G beats Bmt G Lum W vs Lum R (give me your pick) Png G beats Png W WOS vs Ned B (give me your pick) [/quote]I'll take Lum R because u said they hit harder. [/quote] LOL...good one.  What about WOS vs Ned B

[quote name="dogfather" post="1074119" timestamp="1317838251"] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1074100#msg1074100 date=1317836492] [quote author=demons95 link=topic=89140.msg1074084#msg1074084 date=1317835506] I just got finished printing the Super Bowl trophies.  I already put BMT-G's name on it.  Ya'll are a good team but take the props people give you and keep handling business.  That rotator cuff has to be sore as many times as ya'll pat yourselves on the back.  I saw that game with Lum-R and #3 went up the gut untouched 2 or 3 times for touchdowns.  I assure you that won't happen with Lumberton White. Better have your 7 yr old big boy panties on.  It's gonna be a long day. [/quote]#3 up the middle will be the least of your problems ;D Your right, its gonna be a long day for others as well [/quote]The DOGFATHER will be there ( to bad all this message board DONT fire the Kids up )             [color=red][u][b]We are reeeTards[/b][/u][/color][/quote] You said it dogfather!  Man this is fun.  Demons95...you have no idea... Bmt G ain't the watered down teams y'all been playing.

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074150" timestamp="1317840824"] [quote author=dawg-lover link=topic=88772.msg1074148#msg1074148 date=1317840464] You believe the media? I have never heard of a punishment where they have a list of things to do in order to be reinstated. Normally you are given the punishment, you serve your time and then you are reinstated. I just find it to be a huge coincidence that only the 2 football players have been released early and the 3 others are still finishing out their punishment. What is that teaching the kids? [/quote] That "athletic kids will be athletic kids"...all others fall under "kids will be kids" and that it's ok....because everyone else is doing it, HS, NCAA (DI, DII, DIII, JuCo) NFL, MLB, NBA, badmitten, etc [/quote] Look folks, another comment that makes no sense!

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074018" timestamp="1317830642"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074016#msg1074016 date=1317830342] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1074012#msg1074012 date=1317830174] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074008#msg1074008 date=1317829877] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073997#msg1073997 date=1317829450] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1073974#msg1073974 date=1317828048] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073966#msg1073966 date=1317827382] Yes, Ned kids who were drinking or had been and got caught (even if was due to further stupidity of posting it) and the extention of those action as to how others attending the same party (and others) were NOT so lucky. Several has stated that had the OF kids been there kids...then heads would roll....etc etc etc. So..had the Ned kids fallen, and been killed would that change the blame from kids being kids to HANG the home owner. The point is everyone wants to take one road if it seems "innocent enough" no one got hurt, its kids being kids......but had those kids died or killed someone else....then crucify someone else because its their fault. As stated, as young as 14 you can be accountable as an adult. Just answer this question (this is to anyone, and everyone) if these were your kids....would you treat the situation differently as it happened than you would had they been killed, or killed someone else, maybe even killed your kid while driving on their way to the school. Why and/or why not? [/quote] What doe "Why and/or why not?" mean.  Also, please explain the question more clearly.  It is hard to understand.  If I understand it right, then it is an insanely stupid question.  Please clarify. [/quote] Ok, let me type this a whole lot slower. If  one  of  the Ned  kids  had  fallen  and  died,  would  you  have  felt  any  different  about  this  situation? Why  would  you  have  felt  the  same,  or  why  would  you  have  felt  differently? it is all opinions here, and obviously some of yours vary from mine. But if a person purposly pulls a gun and starts shooting, you could be charged with attempted murder. Therefore IMO (regardless of yours) If a person purposely gets drunk, purposely gets behinds a wheel and purposely drives (and potentialy puts my family's life at risk) it should be attempted murder or manslaughter. It is an intentional act that puts other (innocent) peoples lives in danger, and if its considered a dead horse so be it.....alot better than a dead people. [/quote] Thanks for clarifying your question.  Now I can tell that it truly was a stupid question and not just very poorly written.  Let me ask you this.  Do you agree that speeding on the freeway is dangerous...even deadly?  Have you ever gone over the speed limit?  If you were pulled over for speeding, should you be arrested for attempted murder or manslaughter?  How do you like your steak cooked?  What are you wearing right now.  Will these stupid questions or analogies ever stop?  ...Get my point? [/quote] In fact I do! Anytihng can be justified! ;) [/quote] That is ridiculous... [/quote] Why? because my opinion varies from yours? Must be a democrat (open or closet) when someone's opinion varies from yours....just start calling them names. ::) [/quote] Believe me, I am FAR from being a Democrat.  I have never called you a name (though some may have come to mind).  I did say that some of your statements were ridiculous or stupid, because they are. Stating that someone pulled over simply for speeding should be tried as a murderer is unintelligent.  It's not the fact that we disagree, it's the appearance that you are possibly out of touch with reality that prods me to make the statements I have made. ...and from the responses you have been getting to your goofy unintelligible posts, I would say I am not alone in my assessment.

[quote name="pngfan97" post="1074017" timestamp="1317830527"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1073880#msg1073880 date=1317821676] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1073862#msg1073862 date=1317820376] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89140.msg1073781#msg1073781 date=1317782909] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89140.msg1073558#msg1073558 date=1317764725] Not only do they have speed, those guys are physical and dont mind laying the wood. I know there's a rumor that they can't hit, and they don't like to get hit. I think they've proven some folks wrong over the past few weeks!! [/quote] With all due respect Dawgsof gold, both of the Lumberton teams out hit the BMT G team (not by much) in my opinion; however, you guys have a very well coached greasy lightning fast team with some hosses on it.  Lum W can hit, but they can't hit what they can't catch.  Good luck to you and your athletes. [/quote]Both Lumberton teams out hit Bmt G is too funny. I think Lum R coaches and players will say otherwise. [/quote] Bmt G hits real good and they are fast, but they do not out hit Lum R or Lum W.  I am not saying it is a landslide, but I have seen all 3 play in several games and I would have to rank 1. Lum R 2. Lum W 3. Bmt G in that 3 way match up.  No disrespect intended, believe me.  You guys will beat Lum W...I am sure of it.  You've got some decent hitters and crazy speed.  I like watching your boys play. [/quote] Last time I checked, out hitting a team doesn't mean anything if it doesn't put points on the scoreboard.  And I'm sorry, but I saw some of the bmt g/lum r game and that was about as lopsided a contest between two good teams I've ever seen.  Bmt G dominated that game from start to finish and put plenty of hard hits on Lum r's workhorse.  Bmt g is a scary team. [/quote] I have stated on numerous occasions that Bmt G is a better team than anyone in their division and have a chance of winning it all.  We were simply having a discussion about who hits harder.  Bmt G definitely dominated the Lum R...that was never the question.  They did lay down some hard hits too.  Nobody questions that either.  I simply stated (and I have watched many of all 3 teams' games) that Lum R hits harder...doesn't mean they are going to win another game or that Bmt G can't hit.  Hope that clears it up...

[quote name="58SHW" post="1074012" timestamp="1317830174"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1074008#msg1074008 date=1317829877] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073997#msg1073997 date=1317829450] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1073974#msg1073974 date=1317828048] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073966#msg1073966 date=1317827382] Yes, Ned kids who were drinking or had been and got caught (even if was due to further stupidity of posting it) and the extention of those action as to how others attending the same party (and others) were NOT so lucky. Several has stated that had the OF kids been there kids...then heads would roll....etc etc etc. So..had the Ned kids fallen, and been killed would that change the blame from kids being kids to HANG the home owner. The point is everyone wants to take one road if it seems "innocent enough" no one got hurt, its kids being kids......but had those kids died or killed someone else....then crucify someone else because its their fault. As stated, as young as 14 you can be accountable as an adult. Just answer this question (this is to anyone, and everyone) if these were your kids....would you treat the situation differently as it happened than you would had they been killed, or killed someone else, maybe even killed your kid while driving on their way to the school. Why and/or why not? [/quote] What doe "Why and/or why not?" mean.  Also, please explain the question more clearly.  It is hard to understand.  If I understand it right, then it is an insanely stupid question.  Please clarify. [/quote] Ok, let me type this a whole lot slower. If  one  of  the Ned  kids  had  fallen  and  died,  would  you  have  felt  any  different  about  this  situation? Why  would  you  have  felt  the  same,  or  why  would  you  have  felt  differently? it is all opinions here, and obviously some of yours vary from mine. But if a person purposly pulls a gun and starts shooting, you could be charged with attempted murder. Therefore IMO (regardless of yours) If a person purposely gets drunk, purposely gets behinds a wheel and purposely drives (and potentialy puts my family's life at risk) it should be attempted murder or manslaughter. It is an intentional act that puts other (innocent) peoples lives in danger, and if its considered a dead horse so be it.....alot better than a dead people. [/quote] Thanks for clarifying your question.  Now I can tell that it truly was a stupid question and not just very poorly written.  Let me ask you this.  Do you agree that speeding on the freeway is dangerous...even deadly?  Have you ever gone over the speed limit?  If you were pulled over for speeding, should you be arrested for attempted murder or manslaughter?  How do you like your steak cooked?  What are you wearing right now.  Will these stupid questions or analogies ever stop?  ...Get my point? [/quote] In fact I do! Anytihng can be justified! ;) [/quote] That is ridiculous...

[quote name="58SHW" post="1073997" timestamp="1317829450"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=88772.msg1073974#msg1073974 date=1317828048] [quote author=58SHW link=topic=88772.msg1073966#msg1073966 date=1317827382] Yes, Ned kids who were drinking or had been and got caught (even if was due to further stupidity of posting it) and the extention of those action as to how others attending the same party (and others) were NOT so lucky. Several has stated that had the OF kids been there kids...then heads would roll....etc etc etc. So..had the Ned kids fallen, and been killed would that change the blame from kids being kids to HANG the home owner. The point is everyone wants to take one road if it seems "innocent enough" no one got hurt, its kids being kids......but had those kids died or killed someone else....then crucify someone else because its their fault. As stated, as young as 14 you can be accountable as an adult. Just answer this question (this is to anyone, and everyone) if these were your kids....would you treat the situation differently as it happened than you would had they been killed, or killed someone else, maybe even killed your kid while driving on their way to the school. Why and/or why not? [/quote] What doe "Why and/or why not?" mean.  Also, please explain the question more clearly.  It is hard to understand.  If I understand it right, then it is an insanely stupid question.  Please clarify. [/quote] Ok, let me type this a whole lot slower. If  one  of  the Ned  kids  had  fallen  and  died,  would  you  have  felt  any  different  about  this  situation? Why  would  you  have  felt  the  same,  or  why  would  you  have  felt  differently? it is all opinions here, and obviously some of yours vary from mine. But if a person purposly pulls a gun and starts shooting, you could be charged with attempted murder. Therefore IMO (regardless of yours) If a person purposely gets drunk, purposely gets behinds a wheel and purposely drives (and potentialy puts my family's life at risk) it should be attempted murder or manslaughter. It is an intentional act that puts other (innocent) peoples lives in danger, and if its considered a dead horse so be it.....alot better than a dead people. [/quote] Thanks for clarifying your question.  Now I can tell that it truly was a stupid question and not just very poorly written.  Let me ask you this.  Do you agree that speeding on the freeway is dangerous...even deadly?  Have you ever gone over the speed limit?  If you were pulled over for speeding, should you be arrested for attempted murder or manslaughter?  How do you like your steak cooked?  What are you wearing right now.  Will these stupid questions or analogies ever stop?  ...Get my point?

[quote name="PN-G bamakid" post="1073988" timestamp="1317829032"] I just want to clarify something real quick. Per a very reliable source, the OF kids that died in that tragedy were not coming home from a party in Port Neches, or anywhere else in Mid-County. If they were ever at the party in question (which I doubt providing my information is correct, and I find it hard to believe otherwise), they had left long before the car accident. In any case, I think it's time for this conversation to end. I agree that kids need to be taught about consequences and that examples like these should be used to convince them to think twice, but an argument on an internet message board does nothing to that end and many of the persons in question are minors. [/quote] You are correct.  Time to let it end.

[quote name="Ochocinco" post="1073734" timestamp="1317779409"] [quote author=SmashMouth link=topic=89213.msg1073521#msg1073521 date=1317761490] [quote author=DawgsOfGold link=topic=89213.msg1073443#msg1073443 dayote=1317758378] [quote author=CF22 link=topic=89213.msg1072970#msg1072970 date=1317688228] There all good but I still have PNG-G at the top. I cant wait to see it all shake out in the playoffs...If you want to be technical why dont you power rank the teams like baseball. PNG-G and Ned B have had the easiest schedules out of all these teams. Its hard to judge until they play one another. [/quote] Png-g is the only team that has had an easy road. They have only played PA and you seen the score 15-12. So im not so sure about them being at the top. [/quote] You guys are the ones at the top...Png-G is good though.  Don't underestimate. [/quote]So are Lum R, Lum W, Ned B, & Wos. Im predicting that Png G will lose to Wos or Lum R. Those are tough back 2 back games... [/quote] Those are pretty strong claims...Png G might have something to say about that.  I honestly hope nobody goes undefeated, but I really think Bmt G and Png G will win out in the regular season.  We'll see...