whsalum
Members-
Posts
6,096 -
Joined
-
Last visited
-
Days Won
2
Everything posted by whsalum
-
Hardin Jefferson 94 Silsbee 62/FINAL
whsalum replied to MikelSR's topic in High School Boys Basketball
HJ 79 Silsbee 39 end of 3rd -
Hardin Jefferson 94 Silsbee 62/FINAL
whsalum replied to MikelSR's topic in High School Boys Basketball
68-31 HJ 3:51 3rd -
Little Cypress-Mauriceville 80 Liberty 57/FINAL
whsalum replied to WOSgrad's topic in High School Boys Basketball
The Hawks are missing a couple of starters and one of the first off the bench. May be Silsbee Lite vs HJ Lite -
I heard Lumberton had a post player back who didn’t play last year who is a big body. I know HJ has 2 or 3 starters still playing football. Overall I hear it was a good scrimmage between HJ Lumberton and United.
-
Which volleyball team in SETX will have the deepest playoff run?
whsalum replied to a topic in High School Volleyball
I don't know what the other teams in the region look like but Hardin has an extremely consistent program.They always get everything their players have to give and then some . -
HJ is at Pearland Dawson I believe
-
I saw Livingston last year. They don’t wanna try and run with HJ or match up size wise with HF. They may be in contention for 4th.
-
Some changes to high school basketball per UIL
whsalum replied to AggiesAreWe's topic in High School Boys Basketball
I can’t imagine a high school basketball game with no fans ☹️ -
Livingston may be in a dogfight for the last playoff spot but I don't see them Playing HJ, Huffman of HF close.
-
I wouldn’t think the UIL would have any control over an athlete leaving a UIL school going to a private academy.
-
I don’t think anyone is insinuating that. This rule doesn’t apply to only certain schools. Every team in every district has the same options . The rule is pretty well cut and dry. Students can’t transfer for athletic purposes. If there’s an issue with that do away with the rule.
-
If the opportunities and programs haven’t changed it sure leads one to believe that the move was made for athletic purposes which is the reason for the rule. I hope for the young mans sake this is resolved quickly where he can concentrate on his game. I’m sure he just wants play ball.
-
Did he transfer for athletic purposes? If so and the incoming district recognized it the rule worked as intended.
-
I personally think kids should play high school sports where they live . It eliminates chasing programs and the attempts to follow coaches or programs. If a family decides to go to a private institution in search of a better education I can certainly respect that. If said transfer allows you to play for your dad that’s even better. My question would be did the academics suddenly deteriorate at said institution ? Does dad no longer coach where the young man attended school? Has anything changed at the UIL district where the player resides ? I personally don’t care one way or the other but I can see where there would be questions. I will say it was a lot more fun watching HF last year than it has been in the past few years.
-
I imagine every transfer is scrutinized these days.
-
I don’t have access to the particulars of this case but I can bet my bottom dollar that district superintendents and athletic directors didn’t vote against eligibility based on rumor.
-
You may have seen it happen. I haven’t seen it but then again I’ve never sat in one of these meetings. I have however had close dealings with many superintendents over the years and eligibility requirements of athletes wasn’t high on their list of priorities. I can assure you I’m not naive. I also think that if you aren’t going to hold people accountable for the rules you need to do away with the rules.
-
The DEC doesn’t deal in what ifs and maybes. They are a committee of Leaders of not only the district athletic departments but also the entire school systems. For them to deny eligibility there had to be proof of a rules infraction. There’s nothing new in the rule book.
-
I think we’re saying the exact same thing . In this most recent case the kid isn’t being denied the right to play. He can still play where he did last year and the year before.
-
I think it’s important to know who makes up the DEC. It’s not comprised of basketball coaches. The voting members of a DEC are Superintendents and Athletic Directors. To think school Superintendents got together to intentionally deny eligibility for one basketball player would be a stretch to say the least. I never understood why anyone would want to play basketball or any other sport anywhere in high school where he didn’t live. If a kid isn’t good enough to start in the BU program he probably isn’t going to get a scholarship to play college basketball by transferring to HF. I have no idea what the facts of this case are but if someone is denied eligibility there’s more to it than a group getting together and deciding to vote against a kid. The votes usually go in favor of the kids if there’s any doubt.
-
I can agree with that
-
Way to go ladies
-
A power? Coach Mitchell does a great job but I wouldn’t consider a 3rd or 4th place district finish a power.
-
????